http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이천현(Lee, Cheon-Hyun) 한양법학회 2015 漢陽法學 Vol.26 No.3
“Solicitation Prohibition Law” that will be came into force from 28/09/2016 prohibit unjust solicitations, and it is enacted that everyone get sanction such as disciplinary action, fine, penalty in cases of not observance of the law. Traditionally, some laws such as Criminal Law and the Attorneys-at-Law Act has been punishing the only unjust solicitation was associated with bribery. However Solicitation Prohibition Law is to regulate the unjust solicitation itself, and so extend the scope of the sanctions. For this reason, it is a subject of considerable debate. In this study, in order to secure the trust of the people for Solicitation Prohibition Law and to ensure of the rational operation of the Law, the issues relating to the unjust solicitation and sanctions is examined and proposed its improvements. Behaviors that were common in our society all the while are turned to illegal behaviors by enactment of Solicitation Prohibition Law, and for that reason there are not a few animosity and concern against the Solicitation Prohibition Law. In particular, it has the following problems with respect to the unjust solicitation: ① the object of punishment is not clear, ② in relation to the interpretation of the exceptions of unjust solicitation it is conflicts of interpretation ideology, that is, when you consider the legislative intent of the unjust solicitation prohibition, the exception-regulations should be interpreted restrictively, however, when you consider the fact that exception-regulations is just the exception for penalties, they must be interpreted widely, ③ There is also controversy about the level or range of sanctions, ④ we need the in-depth discussion on Tatbestand of the crime. In order to not repeat the mistakes that Family Ritual Standards Act (Repealed) made, to secure the trust of the people, and ensure effective for Solicitation Prohibition Law, it is required to manage rationally the Law and social consensus through ongoing discussions.
이천식(Cheon Sik Lee),서원영(Won Young Seo),오성웅(Seong Ung Oh),이재준(Jae Jun Lee),김종인(Jong In Kim),이성주(Seong Joo Lee) 대한내과학회 1988 대한내과학회지 Vol.35 No.3
N/A One hundred and sixty five cases of uper gastrointestinal bleeding were examined by fiberoptic endoscopy at Busan Medical Center from July 19S4 to June 1987. The results obtained were as follows; 1) The sex incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding revealed a greater prevalence in males than in females with a ratio of 4 to 1 and the peak age group were in the 5th and 6th decades. 2) The causative disease which were found to protace upper gastrointestinal bleeding were in the order of frequency of peptic ulcer (43.0%), esophageal varices (21.8%), hemorrhagic gastritis(18.8%), stomach cancer (9.1%), Mallory-Weiss syndrome (3,6%) and marginal ulcer. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin was 3.1%. 3) On of cyamination the mode of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, the incidence of melenal only was noted in 36.4% of the cases, hemestasis only in 32.7% and hematemesis with melena in 30.9%. 4) The severity of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was classified by cammock's criteria as massive in 46.1%, moderate in 40.0% and mild in 13.9% of the cases. 5) The frequency of upper gastrointestinal bleeding at admission was first time bleeding in 41.8% of the cases, second time bleeding in 20.0% third time bleeding in 17.0% and over third time bleeding in 21.2%. 6) The success rate in identifying the bleeding site in relation to the time of endoscopy after upper gastrointestinal bleeding began was 69.4% within 24 hours, 54.3% in 24-48 hours, 17.9% In 48-72 hours and 7.7% after 7 days, The success rate fell with increasing time after upper gastrointestinal bleeding began, 7) The factors which influenced the outcome of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was age, severity of bleeding and episode of bleeding. The overall mortality rate was 9.7%
2009년 12월 11일 한양대학교 법학연구소 학술대회 : 「주요법 개정의 현황과 문제점」-민법, 형법, 상법, 개정의 쟁점과 관련하여- ; 재산범죄 분야의 개정에 관한 소고
이천현 ( Cheon Hyun Lee ) 한양대학교 법학연구소 2010 법학논총 Vol.27 No.1
Korean Criminal Law was revised eight times so far this year since it was established in 1953. Criminal Law Revisions in the field of crimes against property were three times: the third revision (1995), the fifth revision (2002) and the seventh revision (2005). In this way, it`s rare to revise crimes against property in Criminal Law. The object of this study is the field of crimes against property in Particulars of Criminal Law. But, in order to limit the range of the discussion, it is not be studied all regulations of the field of crimes against property individually but be studied only some regulations that intimately connected to one another in the field of crimes against property. This study considers the trend of the Criminal Law revision(Ⅱ) and proposes developmental strategies of the Criminal Law revision from now on(Ⅲ). The efforts for the total revision of the Criminal Law still exists. The government (Ministry of Justice) and the relevant academic societies pull out all the stops to revise the Criminal Law. It is expected to be proposed Criminal Law Revision Draft(a government bill) that is the fruit of their efforts before long.
제3차 대한간학회 춘계학술대회 초록집 : Holmium-166 macroaggregate의 경피적 종양내주입에 의한 원발성 간암의 치료
이천균 ( Lee Cheon Gyun ),한광협 ( Han Gwang Hyeob ),이종태 ( Lee Jong Tae ),최원 ( Choe Won ),이관식 ( Lee Gwan Sig ),전재윤 ( Jeon Jae Yun ),문영명 ( Mun Yeong Myeong ),박경배 ( Park Gyeong Bae ) 대한간학회 1997 Clinical and Molecular Hepatology(대한간학회지) Vol.3 No.2(S)