RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      • 좁혀본 항목

      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
          • 원문제공처
          • 등재정보
          • 학술지명
          • 주제분류
          • 발행연도
          • 작성언어
          • 저자

        오늘 본 자료

        • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
        더보기
        • 무료
        • 기관 내 무료
        • 유료
        • KCI등재

          상표법상 상표 등록주의의 개선방안

          이종구(Lee, jong koo*) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2015 과학기술과 법 Vol.6 No.1

          '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

          Living in development of the Internet era and the industrial society, consumer, it is difficult to choose from the various manufacturers of products. Is similar to bulk consumers choose products flooding in the process of economic over supply of goods under the brand today homogeneous production, increasing the importance and value. A trademark is cognizable mark, such as a sign, a letter, a figure, etc. used by a person who produces, processes or sells goods for business purposes in order to distinguish goods related to his/her business from those of another person. To ensure a good trademark in the consumer’s choice, management has become an important part of business management. The trademark is in honor of his products, such as symbols, letters, shapes used to identify the product with others. Trademarks are human economic activity has blossomed in the process, the desired origin history and general trade. This study refers to ‘the Registration system’ and ‘the Use system’in trademark Act and suggests a means for improving the Korean Trademark Protection System with a focus on a reasonable Trademark law improvement plan. First, the improvement plan applies to the trademark application stage. The Korean Trademark Act is based on the Registration System which grants the registration of a trademark regardless of its use. Although, Article 3 of the Korean Trademark Act stipulates that only the person who uses or intends to use a trademark in the Korean may been titled to have his/her trademark registered. This article is fundamentally incompatible with the Registration system or the first-to-file system adopted by the Korean Trademark Act. Moreover, it is realistically impractical because confirming one’s internal intent-to-use at the trademark application stage is nearly impossible. Therefore, Article 3 of the Korean Trademark Act should be abolished or maintained perfunctorily on the condition of the nominal stipulation being excluded from the grounds for rejection in Article 23 and from the grounds for invalidation in Article 71. Second, when two or more trademark registration applications are filed on the same day with respect to the same or similar goods, the first-to-use applicant should be entitled to obtain the trademark registration. The existing Article 8 of the Korean Trademark Act provides that the applicant determined by agreement among the applicants shall be granted registration. Third, the improvement plan also applies to the maintenance and management stage of trademark rights. The existing Article 73 of the Korean Trademark Act provides that only an interested party may request a trial for revoking or law improvement plan an unused registered trademark. Unused trademarks should be smoothly eliminated for the public interest as well as for competitor interest. Therefore, any person or interested party may request a trial for revoking or law improvement plan a registered unused trademark unused for three or more consecutive years, as in major EU countries and some countries . Lastly, since unused trademarks deserve little legal protection, this paper supports the curtailment of legal rights for unused trademark holders.

        • KCI등재후보

          품질보증과 관련한 최근 판례의 동향 및 시사점

          이종구(Lee Jong Koo) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2015 法學硏究 Vol.26 No.2

          '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

          By Supreme Court Decision 2012Da72582 decided May 16, 2014, the Supreme Court decided that The Rules of Law on Warranty Liability in Contracts. There are also consumer goods caused or complicated and evolved into a new type of rapid development has been released providers and consumers of manufacturing technology and advanced science and technology in a variety of consumer goods between. There also caused to consumers of goods or merchandise does not meet the agreement and marketing strategy, operators and consumers, in order to attract companies to damage their hasty product development and consumer contract terms. Product does not comply with the agreement and marketing strategy, operators and consumers, in order to attract companies to damage their hasty product development and consumer contract terms. Therefore, in the past to deal with this changing reality, it has developed a variety of consumer protection law interests as a special law to protect the rights and consumers and enforcement in Korea. However, this is mainly protected areas are concentrated in the interests of protection against life, body or property risk goods Fire safety deficiencies consumer protection arising therefrom, namely articles missing goods or services, contracts for the consumer There is relates to compliance with consumer protection and quality assurance or let us rely on the relevant provisions of its civil law and commercial law, the general rule would not be an exaggeration to evaluate a problem. warranty in the U.S. is nothing but for the scope of contractual liability focusing on the consumer damage awards. If the warranty is very strict interpretation of jurisprudence in order to meet our legal system to our country, human balance sellers and buyers become sober, because they do not recognize accredited buyers protection to ensure a plurality of legal principles of information, so buyer, it can only be used against you. Therefore, if the seller and the best balance of humanity purchase foreign legal system to achieve these same systems imported flexibly interpret legal principles, so that, when run within our legal system may be the best balance between sellers and buyers of human under implementation, but also for them it should be functioning legal measures provide background will be considered for judicial operations.

        • KCI등재

          사용자 태도 및 교육훈련과 정보시스템 실행 성과간의 관계 - D 사를 중심으로 -

          이종구(Jong Koo Lee),이동만(Dong Man Lee),장명희(Myung Hee Chang) 한국지리정보학회 1998 한국지리정보학회지 Vol.1 No.1

          본 연구는 사용자 특성 중 조직에서 통제 가능한 요인인 사용자의 태도 및 교육훈련이 정보시스템의 실행 성과에 미치는 영향을 검증하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 최근 신정보시스템으로 전환한 D사의 사용자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 첫째, 사용자 태도와 교육훈련은 각각 독립적으로 정보시스템의 실행 성과에 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 사용자 태도와 교육훈련이 결합한 상호작용 효과는 시스템 사용도에는 유의 This study intends to identify the effects of user attitude, user education & training on the information systems implementation performance. In order to obtain data, survey questionnaires were distributed to the users of 'D' company, the major findings c

        • 농지매매와 농지임대차에 관한 소고

          이종구(Lee, jong koo) 한국부동산경매학회 2021 부동산경매연구 Vol.2 No.1

          '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

          현행 농지법은 1949년에 제정된 농지개혁법을 모태로 하여 1996년부터 시행되었다. 1994년에 농지개혁법이 폐지되었지만 그 정신은 민법에 그대로 남아있는 것이다. 하지만 농지개혁에 관한 법학적인 논의는 미진한 상황이다. 농지개혁법 이래 현재까지 많은 사회적, 경제적 변화가 있었고, 농지법 체계는 그에 대응하여 개정되어 왔다. 이른바 경자유전은 헌법에만 선언되어 있으며, 농지법은 이를 구체화하지 못하고 있고, 농지취득자격증명은 유명무실한 제도로 전락하였다. 비농업인의 농지 취득 요건이 크게 완화되어 있는 상황에서, 사후적으로도 농업경영에 이용하지 않는 농지에 대한 처분명령제도가 있으나 실효성이 낮아서 비농업인 농지소유 면적이 증가하고 있는 실정이다. 농지를 취득한 비농업인에 대해서는 농지이용실태조사를 통해 찾아내어 처분명령 및 이행강제금 부과 방식을 도모하고 있지만, 이농ㆍ상속 등 광범위한 예외적 농지소유 허용 등으로 사적 영역에서 자유로운 임대차가 가능하다. 이 결과 한국농어촌공사 위탁 관리 비율도 높지 않은 상태이다. 농업인과 농업경영의 개념의 명확한 구분이 필요하다 할 것이다. 우리 헌법상 경자유전원칙은 농업인을 전제로 한다. 따라서 농업인인지 여부를 판단하는 것은 농업이라는 산업에 종사하는 사람, 농업정책자금의 대상자, 농지취득자격을 갖춘 자, 농축협 조합원이 될 수 있는 자, 농업소득에 대하여 세금 감면 대상자, 농업인법률구조사업을 받을 수 있는 자 등등의 의미일 것이다. 문제는 선진국과 달리 우리나라에서는 어떤 사람이 농업인인지 여부를 확인하고 거래의 안전을 위한 공시수단이 애매모호하다는 점에 있다. 농업활동의 정의나 농업인 정의가 우리 법에서는 열거주의로만 되어 있기에 농업에 종사하는지 그만 두는지 여부도 불명확하다. 농지법상 예외적 농지소유 허용 및 임대차 허용 대상에 대한 실태 파악을 위하여는 농지유동화 정보시스템 구축, 농지 접근성 확보를 위한 안정적 농지이용 체계구축이 필요하다 할 것이다. 농지의 효율적 이용을 위해 중장기적으로 경작 허가 개념을 도입하는 방안이다. ‘경자(耕者)’의 범위를 좀 더 구체화하여 독일, 프랑스 등의 사례처럼 적격자에게 농지이용을 허가하는 경작허가제를 도입하는 것이다. 농업인의 자기보고(self-reporting) 방식으로 접근하고, 경작 증명 등과 관련하여 마을단위, 농업인조직 등을 통해 모니터링하는 방안이다. 경자유전 원칙을 유지하고 있는 대부분의 국가에서 가산(家産)으로서 농지상속을 허용하고 있다는 점을 고려하여 상속농지에 의한 비농업인의 농지취득을 금지할 것이 아니라 비농업인 소유 농지를 농업인이 안정적으로 이용할 수 있도록 제도화하는 것이다. The current Agricultural Land Law came into effect in 1996, with the Agricultural Land Reform Law enacted in 1949 as the mother s womb. The Land Reform Act was abolished in 1994, but the spirit remains in the Civil Code. Since the Land Reform Act, there have been many social and economic changes to date, and the Agricultural Land Act system has been revised accordingly. The so-called light vehicle inheritance is declared only in the Constitution, and the Agricultural Land Law does not embody this, and it has fallen into a famous and innocent system of people qualified to acquire agricultural land. In the situation where the requirements for acquiring Agricultural Land of Non-farmers have been greatly relaxed, there is a system for ordering the disposal of agricultural land that is not used for agricultural management even after the fact, but due to its low effectiveness, the area owned by Non-farmers Agricultural Land is increasing. Is the reality. Considering that most countries that maintain allow the inheritance of farmland as an addition (household production), instead of prohibiting the acquisition of farmland by inherited farmland, the farmland owned by Non-farmers is used. It will be institutionalized so that agriculture can be used stably.

        • KCI등재

          연구논문(硏究論文) : 중국의 직접판매관리조례와 다단계 판매금지조례에 관한 소고

          이종구 ( Jong Koo Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2011 법학논총 Vol.35 No.2

          In the late 1980s, JAPAN LIFE began selling an illegal multi-level marketing In China. In 1990, AVON, limited partnership company China with US, launched their business. After their success, many foreign companies branched out China of variety form. It made China`s domestic companies also begin to participate in the competition. Because of this, illegal multi-level marketing was expanding. The Chinese government regarding it as social problem so, they released "multi-level management Act" which prohibit and allow for some company. In 2005, "Direct Sales Management Act" and "Anti Pyramid Scheme Act" was released by China`s State Council. It made a rule and served legal basis for field of direct selling. Direct Selling is one of many kinds of bussiness form. But, As direct Selling has been introduced not long the China, few customer have awareness and the ability to distinguish between direct sales and pyramid scheme. In China, Direct Selling and the Pyramid was strictly defined and distinguished entirely different kind of selling. Direct sales is defined "Direct Sales Act article 3", "Direct Sales Act article 24 of chapter 4" and Pyramid selling is "Anti pyramid scheme ACT article 2".

        • KCI등재

          개인정보 보호와 개인영향평가제도

          이종구(Lee, Jong-Koo) 충북대학교 법학연구소 2012 法學硏究 Vol.23 No.2

          '스콜라' 이용 시 소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우, 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 7시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

          Since e-government maturing of privacy and personal information is emerging a key issues among others. The personal information protection act established in March, 2011 in Korea. But the personal information protection act have many problems. First, it must promote the efficiency of the law. Second, it must improve the organization personal information protection. Third, it must harmonies another acts on the personal information protection. Fourth, it must well perform the personal information impact Assessment. The legislation of the Personal Information Protection Act(hereinafter 'PIPA') streamlined various Acts related personal information, and made the privacy right for the information subject reinforce. Albeit better than before, there are some articles to provide reasonable adjustment to make them clear what is to be achieved firstly, the correction of legal terminologies and legal sentences for getting the legislative purposes of this PIPA, secondly, the harmonization between the PIPA and the other related Acts, based on PIPA which is the center for the protection of personal information, thirdly, the legislative consideration of the emerging 'right to be forgotten'. The personal information protection act will promote the level of personal information protection. And the establishment of personal information protection committee enables institution and policy changes differently from the personal information protection and promote the efficiency of the law the collection and use of personal information.

        • KCI등재

          논문(論文) : 영업비밀에 대한 소고

          이종구 ( Jong Koo Lee ) 영남대학교 법학연구소 2014 영남법학 Vol.0 No.39

          This article is Trade secrets Law and freedom of occupation. Especially some of the staff need to be protected in Korea. It is known that many of companies protect its intellectual prtperty in the form of trade secret at the same time and the damages from the infringement of trade secret have been increased. First,the concept of trade secret law, trade secret protection, infringement and remedies discussed. Second, Trade secrets in order to protect is employee Prohibition of Competitive Transaction. As a means of exercising the legal obligations of confidentialiy and trade secret protection law obligations, which a lot of case law in this respect compared to the jurisprudence of the United States. Secret Protection Act(hereinafter. Korea Unfair Competition Prevention Act) is actually similar to the original injunction claim based on property right of Korea Civil Law, In addition, Korean Theory had better focus on the legal aspect of injunction claim based on Korea Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the harmonization of the above injunction claim and the original injunction claim based on property right of Korea Civil Act, rather than the trend of US courts`decision about equitable injunction.

        • 인터넷 웹브라우저에서 화면캡쳐한 파일의 무결성에 관한 연구

          이종구 ( Jong-koo Lee ) 한국정보처리학회 2009 한국정보처리학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.16 No.2

          일반적인 사이버 범죄 중에서 포탈사이트 게시판에 명예를 훼손할 목적으로 글을 올린 경우를 생각해보자. 인터넷 웹브라우저 내용을 출력하거나 화면캡쳐 도구를 이용하여 생성한 파일은 웹브라우저 내용을 클라이언트가 임의로 수정하여 출력하거나 화면캡쳐 파일을 수정할 가능성이 존재하고 무결성 보장이 힘들다. 본 논문에서는 실제 내컴퓨터의 모니터에서 보이는 화면은 얼마든지 조작이 가능함을 예를 들어 보일 것이며 화면캡쳐 파일의 무결성 보장을 위한 시스템을 제시하려고 한다.

        • KCI등재
        맨 위로 스크롤 이동