http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김성남 ( Kim Seong Nam ) (검색결과 45 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
김성남,성익현,김종헌,강영종,Kim, Seong-Nam,Sung, Ik-Hyun,Kim, Jong-Heun,Kang, Young-Jong 한국방재학회 2004 한국방재학회논문집 Vol.4 No.4
본 연구의 대상교량은 세로보와 레일의 중심선이 일치하지 않으며 편심거리가 존재한다. 편심이 존재하지 않는 설계-시공이라면 실제 세로보에서는 열차 하중에 의해 휨 응력만이 발생하게 된다. 그러나 실제 설계-시공 상에서는 세로보와 레일의 중심선이 일치하지 않고 이러한 세로보와 레일의 편심에 의해서 침목에 휨이 발생한다. 이에 따라 침목과 연결되어 있는 세로보에는 휨 응력뿐만 아니라 추가로 비틀림 응력도 발생하게 된다. 이러한 비틀림 응력이 세로보 절취부에 미치는 영향과 수직 브레이싱을 설치하였을 경우의 영향에 대해서 분석해 보도록 한다. The centroid of rail doesn't coincide with the centroid of stringer on target truss bridge. If there is no eccentricity on the bridge, bending stress works only. But in the real design and execution, not only bending stress works but also torsional stress does because of it's eccentricity. So this study evaluates how much the torsional stress by eccentricity effects joint members on the bridge. We investigate the possibility to control torsional stress if we model longitudinal bracing between stringers.
-
김성남(Kim Seong Nam),김상중(Kim Sang Joong),김창현(Kim Chang Hyun) 한국철도학회 2004 한국철도학회 학술발표대회논문집 Vol.- No.-
It is the urgent task of induce the inhabitants to utilize the public transportation instead of the personal transportation to dissolve the traffic jam. But construction of the subway, the representative substitute means, demands a great of investment expense including various kinds of expenses. So the technical development and research of standardization of FRT(Fuel cell Rubber tired Train), the eco-friendly public transportation system low in construction expenses, effective, excellent in approach as well as in traffic, are propelled positively. This project wants to propose exterior design FRT in which original creative methods are utilized with the target of development and construction of FRT which coincide with anthropocentric eco-friendly traffic system. Utilizing the proposed style as the basic materials, this project wants to grasp difficulties, and to establish the way to solve and develop them.
-
-
Waste Heat recovery for savings fuel and protecting the environment
김성남(Kim Seong Nam) 한국마린엔지니어링학회 2010 한국마린엔지니어링학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2010 No.10
Current interest in reducing emissions and reducing engine operating costs is leading towards the use of more effective waste heat recovery. By adapting the tuning of the Wartsila low-speed two-stroke marine engines to increase exhaust gas energy and employing both steam and exhaust gas turbines in a Total Heat Recover Plant, an electrical output of about 11% of engine power is possible. Such savings can make a major contribution to improving both plant efficiency and engine emissions. This Total Heat Recovery Plant is attracting much interest from shipowners interested in saving fuel costs and reducing emissions. It must be remembered that modern large, low-speed marine engines are so highly developed.
-
김성남(Kim seong nam) 한국비교사법학회 2016 비교사법 Vol.23 No.4
수인한도는 합리적인 사람이 사회생활에서 참을 수 있는 한도를 말하는 것이고, 수인한도론은 이 수인한도에 대한 해석론으로 민법 제217조를 그 출발점으로 한다. 생활방해는 정당한 권원에 의한 권리행사로 인하여 이웃 토지 소유자 및 거주자에 대한 방해 또는 손해가 문제가 되므로 당해 생활방해를 동반하는 권리행사에 대한 위법성 여부의 판단이 중요하고, 그 기준이 되는 것이 수인한도이다. 판례에서는 위법성 판단을 위한 수인한도의 일반적 판단기준과 그 외 침해유형별로 새로운 기준을 제시하기도 하여 구체적 사례에서의 모든 사정을 종합적으로 고려하여 그 초과 여부로서 위법성을 판단하고 있다. 그러나 모든 개별적 사정을 종합하여 고려하는 방법은 모든 사정을 일일이 검토하여 그 초과 여부를 정한다는 것인지 포괄적으로 종합 판단한다는 것인지 애매하고, 종합적 판단은 물론 그 판단기준을 일일이 검토한다고 해도 어느 기준에서 어느 정도의 가중치로 최종적인 수인한도 판단에 영향을 미치는지에 대해 알 수 없어 객관성을 결여한다. 본고에서는 생활방해에 대한 위법성 판단기준인 수인한도 초과 판단의 객관성을 확보하기 위해 침해유형별로 주된 수인한도 판단기준을 설정하여 그 중요도를 설정하고 그 단계별로 수인한도를 적용하는 3가지 구체적 판단방법을 제시해 본다. Article 217 of Civil law is ban to nuisance in principle. It was devised to adjust for the problem of real estate used between neighboring in reasonably and covers ownership disturbance but also the resident s right of pain avoidance in a daily life and interpreted to neighboring land and buildings, thus carving personal interest to live in decent conditions out of its application. According to this have to duty of endurance for the any condition but if beyond that condition can do the claim of the appropriate action and ruled rated for determining the illegality. That is the basis judged for illegality and over the endurance limit is determined illegality on the nuisance and environmental violations, this judgment is based on the illegality. Endurance limit means a limit that a rational man can endure while he leads a social life, which accepts illegality when an extent of infringement goes beyond the limit generally acceptable in leading a social life in respect with environmental pollution and nuisance. The theory of the endurance limit is interpretation of article 217 of the civil law. The court is to judge for endurance limit, whether it goes beyond endurance limit by comprehensively considering decided taking into account public utility of inflicting company, locality, the order of priority of land use, special circumstance of the inflicted, continuance of infliction, observance of public regulating standard, evasion possibility of damage and measure of damage prevention of inflicting party. In practice, however, only one or two major suspectability criteria for the type of infringement are applied, and other additional susceptibility criteria have an influence on the overall susceptibility, It does not seem to be actually taken into account as to how it affects the judgment. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish each infringement type in order to secure the objectivity of judging the infringement. This is a three-step application method for judging nuisance. In order to do this, the types of infringement against life disturbance were first identified. And, each type of infringement and according to the types of infringement, the priority factor, the supplementary factor, and the reference factor were classified and tried to specify and differentiate the application. It is a priority factor, a supplementary factor, and a reference factor. It is possible that the overriding or overvaluation may be determined from the priority factor and the overvaluation may be determined in conjunction with the supplemental or reference factor. This leads to a demand for more detail and objective standard for the endurance limit, adjusting established requisites for protecting nuisance. They are will help to ensure rationality and objectivity of the endurance limit.
-
-
-
김성남(Kim Seong Nam) 중앙대학교 법학연구원 2016 法學論文集 Vol.40 No.1
Article 217 of Civil law is ban to nuisance in principle. It was devised to adjust for the problem of real estate used between neighboring in reasonably and covers ownership disturbance but also the resident’s right of pain avoidance in a daily life and interpreted to neighboring land and buildings, thus carving personal interest to live in decent conditions out of its applicaton. According to this have to duty of endurance for the any condition but if beyond that condition can do the claim of the appropriate action and ruled rated for determining the illegality. That is the basis judged for illegality and over the endurance limit is determined illegality on the nuisance and environmental violations, this judgment is based on the illegality. In other words, endurance limit means a limit that a rational man can endure while he leads a social life, which accepts illegality when an extent of infringement goes beyond the limit generally acceptable in leading a social life in respect with environmental pollution and nuisance. The court is to judge for endurance limit, whether it goes beyond endurence limit by comprehensively considering decided taking into account public utility of inflicting company, locality, the order of priority of land use, special circumstance of the inflicted, continuance of infliction, abservance of public regulating standard, evasion possibility of damge and measure of damage prevention of inflicting party. So judgment stages can be divided into 3 in applying, which is factor of preferential, factor of residual and factor of referential for endurence limit judged equip objectivity. This leads to a demand for more detail and objective standard for the endurance limit, adjusting established requisites for protecting nuisance. They are will help to ensure rationality and objectivity of the endurance limit.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
