RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Long-term change in real-world clinical practice in IPF and its impact on survival: results from consecutive nationwide registries

        ( Sung Woo Moon ),( Song Yee Kim ),( Behalf Of Ild Study Group ),( Moo Suk Park ) 대한결핵 및 호흡기학회 2019 대한결핵 및 호흡기학회 추계학술대회 초록집 Vol.127 No.-

        Background: The Korean Interstitial Lung Disease Study Group created two nationwide, multicentre consecutive registries on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Comparing these registries, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term change in clinical features, diagnostic modalities, and prognostic factors of IPF in the real world. Methods: We enrolled patients from the first registry (2008 group, January 2002-September 2008) and the second registry (2018 group, January 2012-August 2018). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the risk factor for the mortality in each registry, Cox regression models were used. Results: The 2008 and the 2018 groups comprised 1839 and 1345 patients, respectively. The 2018 group was younger (P=0.025), had fewer symptoms (P<0.001), had less honeycombing (P<0.001), and was less frequently diagnosed with surgical biopsy (P<0.001). Further, in the 2018 group, steroid use and conservative care declined, while the N-acetylcysteine use increased. Pirfenidone and nintedanib were only used in the 2018 group. 2018 group showed better survival. There was no significant difference in survival between the 2008 group and the 2018 subgroup group who did not use anti-fibrotic agent (P=0.197). In the evaluation of the risk factor for mortality in each registry, significant factors were higher gender-age-physiologic (GAP) score, and history of cancer in the 2008 group, while they were higher GAP score, history of hepatitis, history of cancer, honeycombing on HRCT, and steroid use in the 2018 group. Pirfenidone use (P<0.001) was related with lower mortality in the 2018 group. Conclusions: Actual clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of IPF patients have changed in adherence with guidelines, novel medications, and social circumstances, and the survival of IPF patients have improved. Proper guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF based on accumulated data and observations are crucial and must be combined with newer treatment.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼