http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 李英峻(Young-june Lee) (검색결과 62 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
매산(梅山) 예설(禮說)에 대한 일고찰(一考察)-『매산선생예설(梅山先生禮說)』 통례(通禮)를 통해 본 매산(梅山)의 종통(宗統) 전승(傳承)에 관한 인식-
이영준 ( Lee Young-june ) 한국한문고전학회 2017 한문고전연구 Vol.34 No.1
This article surveys Hong Jikpil`s understanding of lineage system through his 梅山先生禮說(Theories on Rites by master Maesan) compiled by Yi Jin-ok(李鎭玉), especially focused on the items of 宗法, 出後, 次養, 侍養, 攝祀 of its 通禮(Rites in general). In Joseon dynasty which adopted Neo-Confucianism as a national policy, it was lineage system which maintained public order rightly and it was same to Hong Jikpil. Hong strongly kept the principle of succession by the eldest legitimate son(嫡長子), however he also allowed succession by the second legitimate son in unavoidable circumstances accounting the old rituals. He maintained the principle of the strict distinction between legitimate and illegitimate lines of descent, but he, on the other hand, also admitted that a illegitimate son could hold a funeral of his father and legitimate sons which meant that he did not break moral laws of family relationships. He also regarded succession by a illegitimate son as appropriate rather than adopting a relative who had no blood relationship in respect that first, it was permitted by national law; second, it was based on Classic of Rites; and third, it was appropriate to human feelings. As to the title and rituals for the original family of adopted son(本生家), he kept the principle of rigid distinction between the original family and the family he adopted(所後家). But he asserted that one should share one`s natural feeling to one`s original parents that he called himself as an `unworthy` nephew in the epitaph of his original parents which showed the distinction between the original parents who as a result had become an uncle and aunt, and the ordinary uncle and aunt. As to the second adopted son(次養子) and an adopted son regardless of succession(侍養子), he insisted that they are in principle illegal according to ancient ritual though they were widely accepted and conducted among people. He added however, 侍養子 could hold a memorial service for his adoptive parents. He believed that this would be appropriate to human feelings. It is presumable that Hong gave priority to the principle of JIng(經) while considering human feelings and the realistic situation when a judgement on theories on Rites was needed. He on the one hand strongly kept the ideal theories on Rites, and on the other hand suggested the way of 變通(accommodating to circumstances) which was the result of consideration of human feelings. It is assumable that this standpoint which compromises the ideal with the reality underlies his understanding of lineage system.
-
이영준(Young June Lee),최재성(Jae Sung Choi) 대한설비공학회 2022 대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집 Vol.2022 No.6
When an earthquake occurs, even if the structural elements of the building are not damaged, malfunctions such as fire, power outage, and water outage may occur due to damage to equipment not applied with seismic design. As a result, secondary damage may occur due to disaster prevention, crime prevention, and loss of core functions of the building. In the case of the Gyeongju earthquake (2016) and the Pohang earthquake (2017), the damage to non-structural elements was three times greater than that of structural elements. In the case of the Gyeongju earthquake, 4,678 (more than 50%) of 9,352 accidents were non-structural element damage. In addition to the damage that makes it impossible to perform the normal function of the building itself due to safety problems, property loss, and loss of function, there have been reports of reduced or interrupted productivity. In this paper, the seismic design standards of other fields were investigated and a multi-year implementation plan was established to prepare the optimal seismic design standards for mechanical facilities by considering the relationship with the building structural design standards. In addition, the 「Earthquake-Resistant Design Guidelines for Mechanical Equipment Heat Source Equipment(Draft)」was prepared and a plan was proposed to link it to the 「Technical Standards for Mechanical Equipment」.
-
-
-
-
-
이영준(Young June Lee),최재성(Jae Sung Choi) 대한설비공학회 2022 대한설비공학회 학술발표대회논문집 Vol.2022 No.6
When an earthquake occurs, even if the structural elements of the building are not damaged, malfunctions such as fire, power outage, and water outage may occur due to damage to equipment not applied with seismic design. As a result, secondary damage may occur due to disaster prevention, crime prevention, and loss of core functions of the building. In the case of the Gyeongju earthquake (2016) and the Pohang earthquake (2017), the damage to non-structural elements was three times greater than that of structural elements. In the case of the Gyeongju earthquake, 4,678 (more than 50%) of 9,352 accidents were non-structural element damage. In addition to the damage that makes it impossible to perform the normal function of the building itself due to safety problems, property loss, and loss of function, there have been reports of reduced or interrupted productivity. In this paper, the seismic design standards of other fields were investigated and a multi-year implementation plan was established to prepare the optimal seismic design standards for mechanical facilities by considering the relationship with the building structural design standards. In addition, the 「Earthquake-Resistant Design Guidelines for Mechanical Equipment Heat Source Equipment(Draft)」was prepared and a plan was proposed to link it to the 「Technical Standards for Mechanical Equipment」.
-
이영준(Lee Young-june) 서양미술사학회 1999 서양미술사학회논문집 Vol.12 No.-
The purpose of this thesis is to compare the discourse supporting the objectivity and truthfulness in photography and that constituting the truth in history and to analyze how two discourses are upholding each other. When a historical fact is mobilized as a ground for the truthfulness of a photographic image, we are faced with a paradox. For history and photography are both narratives the objectivity of which is not self-constituted but depends on the discursive formation. History and photography both belong to the positivist system of knowledge which operates with the assumption that it reconstructs the reality in an objective way. The meaning of the photographic image is also supported by the historicity of its codes and the historical ‘facts’ coming from other sources. It is with the help of the apparatuses that lifts the photographic image to the level of history that an image becomes a record of history. These apparatuses are the codes endowed upon the image, or the discourses of historiography. However, when the objectivity of photography begins to be doubted, the mutual relationship between photography and history is jeopardized. But the suspicion about the truth and objectivity of photography is raised on a much basic level. The objectivity of photography was critiqued by Roland Barthes when he argued that the photograph is neither transparent nor self-evident entity but a sign saturated by culturally given codes. According to him, the meaning of the photograph is inherently unstably floating but language text fixes it. On the other hand, in the realm of historiography, there are heterogeneous rhetorics in it but they are truncated for the sake of positivist record and only ‘facts’ remain. Such a things occurs by rhetorically emphasizing the fact that “such and such things really happened” which Barthes has called it an ‘eventhood.’ Instead of dealing with facts directly related to the reality, Barthes treats them on the level of signs. All the historiographical efforts construct history by making the events in history as something that really existed. This means the history needs evidence. The biggest irony here is that in order for the status of the photograph as an evidence to be firm it should rely upon another system of evidence, i.e., history. The interdependent circular connection between the history and photography exists in an irony in which both are upholding each other in a vacuum. As the status of the photograph as an evidence is unstable and unfixed, the attempt to explain history with the help of the photograph can occur only locally and its ground is always open to dispute. What matters here is how to reconstitute the photograph as an object of critical reading. It can occur only by revitalizing the heterogeneous rhetorics of photography rather than reducing them. The photography of history is not only meaningful as a record of important historical events belonging to master narratives, but as records of seemingly minute but important details. Indeed, we need a different paradigm than record or evidence. To accept the photograph as evidence means that the elements residing outside the frame of the photograph yet determining what is inside it. We have to concern ourselves not only about the content of utterance but its form and strategy. Therefore what is given to us is not just an image but a discursive formation that channels the meaning of the photograph. So, when we see history in the photograph, we have to focus on other dimensions of history, i.e., the history of the very activity of the record making, the matter of what technique and form of photography have enabled such records, how such records have come to earn credibility and truthfulness and to what audience they address. But the official history that we encounter in a text book or in a museum exerts a discursive power on the monads of history unstable and ambivalent an
ScienceON
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
