RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 연구개발성과의 질적 평가체계 구축 방안

        조현대(Cho Hyun-Dae),홍사균(Hong Sa-Gyun),송완흡(Song Wan-Heup),성태경(Sung Tae-Kyung),김명관(Kim Myung-Gwan),오윤정(Oh Yoon-Jung),정윤성(Jung Yoon-Sung) 과학기술정책연구원 2016 정책연구 Vol.- No.-

        The performance of Korean national R&D programmes and projects has improved in terms of quantity, but the qualitative aspects and the utilization of the R&D results have not been satisfactory. For this reason, there have been attempts to promote a new R&D evaluation paradigm for nurturing creative and challenging research culture and developing high quality R&D outcomes. However, despite the needs and significance of qualitative evaluation, there are limitations such as existing practices, excessive emphasis on quantitative indices. Therefore, this research aims to suggest an approach for qualitative evaluation, measures for improving evaluation institutions and systems. To achieve the aims above, first, this report present the philosophy and a suggested approach for qualitative evaluation. Second, the current national R&D programmes and evaluation institutions have been analysed. Third, foreign cases of qualitative evaluation have been analysed and implications were drawn. Forth, this report propose a future direction for policy paradigm to accommodate qualitative evaluation of national R&D programmes and projects. Fifth, we suggest plans to improve qualitative evaluation by types of national R&D. Sixth, this report provide policy recommendations summarizing the above. The direction for policy paradigm to accommodate qualitative evaluation include ‘enhancing recognition of qualitative evaluation with a human-focus’, ‘establishing a system for qualitative evaluation on the basis of expertism and autonomy’, and ‘establishing a field-oriented system and infrastructure’. As for plans to improve qualitative evaluation by types of national R&D, this report suggest ‘qualitative evaluation based on scientific and social performance via amendment of qualitative evaluation indices reflecting the characteristics of programmes and projects’ in the case of basic research, ‘qualitative evaluation based on technological performance in the case of fundamental research, ‘qualitative evaluation focusing on economic and technological performance and follow-up evaluation’ in the case of mid to long term industrial technology research, and ‘qualitative evaluation focusing on economic and social performance’ in the case of short term industrial technology research. The conclusion part of this report, summarizing the above discussions, proposes ‘establishing dedicated organization for economic evaluation to enhance qualitative evaluation of industrial technology development’, ‘mandating ex-ante qualitative review by dedicated organization’, ‘providing field-oriented and real-time information for systemic qualitative information’, and ‘plans for qualitative evaluation of R&D outcomes’. The results and policy suggestions in this report are expected to be used as basic materials for improving qualitative evaluation in Korea.

      • R&D 투자 영향평가 기반 구축 및 시범분석

        황석원(Seog-Won, Hwang),오승환(Seung-Hwan, Oh),우청원(Ceung-Won, Woo),장필성(Pil-Seoung, Jang),홍사균(Sa-Gyun, Hong),강희종(Hee-Jong, Kang),최창택(Chang-Taek, Choi),김기환(Gi-Hwan, Kim),이재진(Jae-Jin, Lee),김지훈(Ji-Hoon, Kim) 과학기술정책연구원 2016 정책연구 Vol.- No.-

        This study is a late study of “An Exploratory Study on STI policy impact assessment”. In the research of 2015, in principle, it is necessary to evaluate not only R&D investment but also general policies such as various promotion systems, standards and regulations by putting the term “policy impact assessment” in front of it We emphasized the points. However, it is practically very difficultto collect and analyze detailed data of all STI policies. In addition, it is also restricted to allow policy researchers to access data within a certain range. Therefore, this study focuses on the impact assessment of R&D investment, which accounts for the largest percentage of STI policies. In this research, the impact assessment system of R&D investment is analyzed by classifying it into evaluation of economic impact and social impact assessment. Also, the evaluation of economic impact was analyzed separating into a micro viewpoint and a macro viewpoint. First, The analysis of the economic impact assessment of the micro viewpoint relates to how the government’s R&D investment affects enterprises. Specifically, the main analysis target was the employment and investment of companies, the impact on sales and profits. Second, The Analysis for macroeconomic impact assessment on the economy is related to the influence of government’s R&D investment such as national economic growth, employment etc. We also analyzed the spillover effect by industry according to R&D investment. Third, The social impact assessment is to analyze how R&D investment has impacted technology-based social change. This study is a very difficult attempt. However, we analyzed from the point of view of the consumer considering all social change areas as much as possible. The results of the study are summarized as follows. First, the study of economic impact evaluation shows the effect of R&D investment and it can be used as a basis to improve the efficiency and goal of R&D investment in future sectors such as employment, economic growth and investment. Second, through research on social impact assessment, government R&D investment has focused on specific areas in terms of improving the quality of life and social development of people, and confirmed that most social sectors are neglected. In addition, we proposed policy priorities for specific social change indicators and social sectors and proposed long-term R&D investment strategies. Finally, this study is expected to contribute to the establishment of future strategy of private enterprise through the measurement of social change index, the social influence of private research and development, and the influence of technology shock from abroad.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼