http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 함동주 (검색결과 73 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
咸東珠 일본사학회 2002 일본역사연구 Vol.15 No.-
One of the great divides in the modern world is that of the Orient and the Occident. Modern Japanese were no exception in accepting the category of the Orient and the Occident. However, their position in that division was not always fixed. While seeking to become a member of the Occident, they could not but acknowledge their ties with the Orient. Throughout the course of modern history, Japan’s position in that divide gradually moved from the former to the latter. The turning point was the early 1890s when intellectuals groups such as the Miyusha and the Seikyosha led the intellectual directions of the Japanese society. In particular, the Seikyosha played a key role in redefining the meaning of the Orient by emphasizing Japan’s traditional values and identities through its nationalistic views. However, the Seikyosha’s emphasis on the traditional and national values should be put in perspective. Unlike the nationalists in the 1930s, its members fully appreciated the merits of Western values and examples. Not only that, their reevaluations of Japanese values were discussed within the boundary of Western civilization. In short, despite some changes, Japan’s discourse on the Occident of the early Meiji years still remained influential and played a key part in the intellectual and ideological formations of the Seikyosha members in the early 1890s.
-
-
-
일본제국의 한국지배와 근대적 한국상의 창출-대한협회를 중심으로-
함동주 일본사학회 2007 일본역사연구 Vol.25 No.-
With the victory in the Russo-Japanese War, modern Japan accelerated its pace for the construction of an empire. Japan's pace for colonizing Korea caused a great deal of anxieties and discussions in Korean society. This article, in particular, focuses on the formation of contradicting images of Korean society after the Russo-Japanese War. The first of such images was built by Japanese, who attempted to define Korea as a society to be colonized. The second image was built by a large group of Korean intellectuals who accepted Western/Japanese discourse on the superiority of Western/Japanese civilization. This group emphasized the need for self-strengthening through the embrace of civilization from Japan. The third can be called an image of self-reliance and independence for emphasizing Korean potentials for independence. These three groups were both interconnected and contradicting. First of all, Japan's image of Korea was in accordance with the image by the civilization group in that both emphasized Korea's backwardness, ignorance and corruption. It should be noted that the civilization group embraced a large part of Japanese excuses for colonizing Korea. In contrast, Shin Chae-Ho tried to negate Japanese explanations. He denied Japan's argument for Korea's lack of independent spirits and government corrupts by giving highest value to national independence. In short, Shin's indulgence into historical study was an attempt to overcome Japanese argument for colonizing Korea. In this way, the period after the Russo-Japanese War witnessed critical clashes in views on Korea's past, present and future, with deep political implication over Japan's colonization of Korea.
-
-
-
-
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
