RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 한국소설 주제색인 연구

        한만성 연세대학교 대학원 2001 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        근대적 도서관이 등장한 이래, 소설은 도서관의 주요자료로서 구실해 왔다. 그렇지만, 학술 정보유통에 기울여진 노력에 견준다면, 소설의 이용봉사에 관한 한국문헌정보학계의 관심은 미흡한 실정이다. 특정작품에 대한 주제분석의 여지가 없는 기존 분류표를 그 한 예로 들 수 있다. 이에, 한국소설을 대상으로 주제접근이 가능하도록 하는 주제색인방법을 제안하고, 그 색인도구로 소설주제명표를 마련하였다. 소설은 정보가 아니라 예술 작품의 하나로 보아야 한다. 문화적 향유 대상이자, 문학연구의 1차자료이다. 여러 차원의 해석이 가능하고, 폭 넓은 시각에서 이루어질 수 있는 다차원적 색인이 적합하다. 선행연구를 기초로 한국소설 주제색인을 위한 방법을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 패싯기법을 기본으로 하여, 소설의 주제요소를 다섯 가지 부분으로 나누었다. 장르, 테마, 시·공간, 인물, 예비 패싯이 그 요소들이다. 주제색인의 정보원으로 문학사와 비평을 적극적으로 활용할 것을 권장하였으며, 장르와 테마 패싯을 중심으로 주제명표를 구성하였다. 한국소설 주제색인을 위해서는 해당 작품에 대한 문학비평, 문학사, 소설주제명표가 필요하며, 이를 심층적으로 활용할 수 있는 문학전문사서의 활발한 활동이 요청된다. Since the appearance of modern libraries in Korea, fiction has been one of the major materials in the library. But contrary to the efforts of academic bibliographic control, Library and Information society has rather neglected to provide services in the fiction department. For example, universal classification schemes in Korea, KDC and DDC, neither of these systems allow primary subject access to fictions. For that reason, proposing subject indexing and developing fiction subject headings as a tool for indexing are the two objectives of this thesis. Fiction has to be regarded as an artwork, not information. It is the first material that is used for cultural experiences and literature research. Multi-faceted indexing is appropriate for fiction. For it allows various interpretation and many kinds of views. Subject Indexing for Korean Fiction is proposed as follows. Fiction is analysed by six facets : genre, theme, time and space, character, and others. Using literary history and criticism as a source for subject indexing is recommended. Subject Headings for Korean Fiction is constructed as an appendix. Literary criticism and history, subject headings are necessary for subject indexing. And above all, there is a demand for active literature subject specialist to use this in an in-depth way.

      • 成人 男女 太極拳 修練者의 社會化에 관한 硏究

        한만성 明知大學校 社會敎育大學院 1998 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        이 연구에서는 성인 남녀 태극권 수련자의 사회화 과정에 관한 내용을 질문지 조사에 의하여 연구하였고 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 태극권 수련에 참여하게 된 것은 남녀 모두 '건강 증진'이라는 항목이 대상자 225명 중 164명으로 전체 72.89%로 나타났다. 2. 태극권을 수련하게 된 동기는 남녀의 경우 본인이 직접적인 의사에 의하여 다음으로는 친구, 배우자의 권유 순으로 나타났으며 여자의 경우는 본인의 결정 다음으로 배우자의 권유가 친구의 권유보다 앞선다는 사실이 나타났다. 3. 태극권 수련에 관한 가족들의 협조 태도는 남녀 모두 상당히 높은 편으로 나타나 전체적으로 사람들이 태극권 수련에 대해 긍정적 인식을 가지고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 4. 태극권을 인식하는 정도는 남녀 성별로 약간의 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 5. 태극권의 부정적 기능에 대한 인식은 여자가 남자 보다 약간 높은 반응을 나타냈다. 6. 태극권 수련을 중도에서 포기하게 되는 이유는 남자 경우 시간적인 이유가 여자 보다 다소 높게 나타났고 여자의 경우는 경제적인 이유가 남자 보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. We have a close study of their socialization based on paper polls. 1. Their motivation for attending Taekukkwon is that through Taekukkwon they can improve health and at least 72.89% of all responded to the survey and marked the high record. 2. As the case of male they came to learn Taekukkwon through themselves and their friends, their spouses as the case of female, their spouses, themselves, their friends. 3. Their families cooperation degree for learning Taekukkwon is marked highly. 4. The recognition rate of Taekukkwon is a little different according to their sex. 5. Female have more recognition of Taekukkwon's negative function than male. 6. They quit learning Taekukkwon because most male mainly have time to learn while most female have a financial problem.

      • 조선 후기 類書의 자료조직 특성에 관한 연구 : 『芝峯類說』과 『星湖僿說類選』을 중심으로

        한만성 전북대학교 일반대학원 2018 국내박사

        RANK : 247631

        This study selected two representative Yu-seo (Compiled books made up of contents from various sources), Jibong-yuseol (芝峯類說) and Seongho-saseol-yuseon (星湖僿說類選) from the late Joseon Dynasty and analyzed the characteristics of each of them with the aim of organizing the knowledge. Then it drew a conclusions about the characteristics after comparing them focusing on the classification system. The classification and list contents of the Jibong-yuseol (芝峯類說) were reviewed from the 17th Century while referring to the contents listed in Jibongjib (芝峯集), the characteristics and significance of knowledge organization of Lee Su-Gwang (李睟光) were also analyzed. The other research was conducted from the 18th century, the Seongho-saseol (星湖僿說) and the edited versions of Seongho-saseol- yuseon (星湖僿說類選) based on it were scrutinized, to trace how Ahn Jeong-Bok (安鼎福) edited the articles of Lee Ik (李瀷), and also how he clarified the characteristics and significance of knowledge organization work. First, the knowledge organization characteristics of Lee Su-Gwang and Ahn Jeong-Bok are summarized as follows: 1) Lee Su-Gwang's knowledge organization characteristics are (1) Use of abridgement editions, (2) Emphasis on Novels and acceptance of heresy (3) Focus on writing in Korea (4) Independence of poetry and undifferentiated history part. 2) Ahn Jeong-Bok's knowledge organization characteristics are (1) Classification system by hierarchy, (2) Arranging duplicate entries, (3) Changing of article's entries, (4) Reclassification of items into another group (5) The synthesis of articles. Second, the study results comparing classification system of the two books are as follows: (1) In the case of the classification system of Seongho-saseol-yuseon, 20 parts and 125 sections are rather simpler than that of Jibong-yuseol, which consisted of 25 parts and 182 sections, while the 5 larger parts are different. So the information and knowledge can be grasped by a wide three-tiered vision in Seongho-saseol-yuseon. (2) Lee Soo-Gwang's ‘extra course part’ is succeeded by Ahn Jeong-Bok's ‘heresy part’. The content is also diverse, as it encompasses not only Buddhism, Taoism, Medical health care, but also includes Catholicism, and other classes of philosophers. (3) Lee Soo-Gwang's tradition, which emphasizes novels, is continued by Ahn Jung-Bok to some extent. Ahn established ‘miscellaneous novels' section in the history part and does not completely exclude novels. (4) The tradition of Lee Soo-Gwang, who values the works of Korea, is strongly inherited by Ahn Jeong-Bok. Lee Ik’s writing itself strengthened the characters, history, culture of Korea and put priority Korea over China. Ahn Jeong-Bok also focused on Korean people and history, including the entry of ‘the articles of Korean History’. (5) Ahn Jung-bok succeeded the tradition of Lee Soo-Gwang, whose poems part are independent and different from the Chinese Yu-seo system. Dealing with letters, the 2 parts and 11 sections of Ahn is rather brief than the 30 sections of Lee. In conclusion, Lee Soo-Gwang and Ahn Jeong-Bok can be seen as having carried out the knowledge organization work appropriate to the situation in Joseon, without the restraint of the Chinese Yu-seo system.

      • 마르크스·레닌의 革命理論에서의 農民階級의 位相

        한만성 한국정신문화연구원 한국학대학원 1989 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        This thesis is to analize the realistic revolutionary method that in the backward capitalism country Marx and Lenin instituted and prac-ticed. The real stic revolutionary method means the strategy of revo-lution in the condition that the presuppesition of historical necessary proletariat-revolution which Marx described at 'German Ideology' in 1845 is not satisfied. This thesis is to analize this method at three sides. They are 1. Contents of Method 2. Practical effectiveness of Method 3. Fundamental contradiction of Method. 1. The content of method which Marx and Lenin instituted runs as following; First, The revolution is performed continuously. This means that the transition from bourgeoisie democracy-revolution to proletariat Social-revolution is a continuous process without discontination of long period. This is the core of Marx's theory of permanence in revolution or Lenin's theory of growing and transformation of revo-lution. Second, the class alliance is necessary for the success of revo-lution. This means that the proletariat revolution in the stage that proletariat is not majority of population or the capitalistic mode of production don't wholly dominate a society calls for the alliance with other class. According to Marx and Lenin, the most important class is the peasant class. They appraise that peasant class is majority of population in backward society and has a revo-lutionary property. 2. It is not Marx's period, but Lenin's period 1.e. Russia revolution that the effectiveness of this method is verified. Lenin taked over the Marx's theory of Permanence in revolution and class alli-ance, then instituted the theory of growing and transformation of revolution. Lenin's theory is in accord with continuity of revo-lution, but, on the other hand, does not wholly accord with class alliance in Marx's theory. Marx described consistantly the Petty-Peasant among whole peasant as alliance-class, but Lenin discrimi-nated alliance-class in accordance with the stage of revolution. That is to say, in the stage of democracy-revolution whole peasant is alliance-class, but in the stage of socialist-revolution the rural poor is only alliance-class. 3. The effectiveness of this method can be verified in the concrete revolutionary process, but the fundamental contradiction was con-noted in this method and then the contradiction was revealed in the process of socialist construction after revolution. The fun-damental contradiction is a conflict between, on the one hand, the respect that proletariat dictatorship in early stage calls for the continuous alliance with peasant because as usual proletariat is not majority of the state in the early stage, on the other hand, the respect that the socialist-reform policy which proletariat dictatorship has to excute after revolution gives rise to compli-cation with peasant who has the attribute of Petty-Bourgeoisie interest. The trouble which Lenin and Stalin suffered in the pro-cess of Russia Socialist construction was basically caused by this contradiction. This thesis is concluded at the stage that Stalin excuted the policy of enforced mass collectivization in 1929 which could transfor-med the peasant class to a agrarian-proletariat. But this Stalin's policy could not wholly resolve the contradiction which connoted at very first time in the theory of revolutionary method.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼