
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
임플란트 bar 어태치먼트에 사용하는 두 가지 부가적인 유지장치의 유지력 특성 비교
최재원,채성기,허중보 大韓齒科補綴學會 2021 대한치과보철학회지 Vol.59 No.2
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retentive characteristics of the additional attachments used with implant bar attachment under repeated insertion/removal cycles. Materials and methods: The newly developed attachment and the commercially available attachment were investigated: ADD-Lock (AL), Locator blue (LB). Two fixtures were placed parallel to each other on the custom lower mounting, and patrix of each attachment was fixed to the fixture. Also, the matrix of each attachment was placed on the opposing upper mounting. A universal testing machine was used to measure the retentive force during initial, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 2500 repeated insertion/removal cycles. Wear and deformation of the attachment s were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05) and wilcoxon signed-rank test (α=.05) were performed to compare retentive force between each group and before and after 2500 repeated insertion/removal cycles. Results: In terms of initial retentive force and retentive force after 2500 repeated insertion/removal cycles, the AL group (15.24 ± 1.46 N and 9.74 ± 1.16 N) showed significantly smaller values than the LB group (43.53 ± 12.39 N and 22.99 ± 4.77 N) (P<.05). Also, in the loss of retentive force, the AL group (5.50 ± 1.08 N, 36.08%) showed a smaller value than the LB group (20.54 ± 11.89 N, 47.19%) (P<.05). Based on SEM analysis, The AL group showed noticeable wear and deformation in the patrix and the LB group in the matrix. Conclusion: Locator showed a higher initial retentive force than newly developed attachment, while the loss of retentive force was also higher. Both additional attachments are considered to have sufficient retentive force after repeated insertion/removal cycles. 목적: 본 연구는 반복적인 착탈에 따른 임플란트 bar 어태치먼트에 사용하는 두 가지 부가적인 유지장치의 유지력 특성을 평가해보고자 하였다. 재료 및 방법: 본 연구에서는 새롭게 개발된 유지장치(ADD-Lock; AL)와 기존의 상용화된 유지장치(Locator blue; LB)의 두 가지 유지장치를 평가하였다. 두 개의 고정체를 하부 구조물에 평행하게 위치시키고, 각 유지장치의 patrix를 고정체에 연결하였다. 각 유지장치의 matrix는 대합되는 상부 구조물에 위치시키고 고정하였다. Universal testing machine을 이용하여 초기, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 2500회의 반복적인 착탈 동안에 각 유지장치의 유지력을 측정하였다. 유지장치의 마모 및 변형 정도는 주사전자현미경으로 관찰하였다. Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05), 그리고 wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = .05)를 이용하여 통계분석 실시하였다. 결과: 초기 유지력과 2500회의 반복적인 착탈 후 유지력에서, AL군(15.24 ± 1.46 N, 9.74 ± 1.16 N)은 LB군(43.53 ± 12.39 N, 22.99 ± 4.77 N)보다 유의하게 작은 값을 보였다(P < .05). 또한, 유지력 소실량에 있어서도 AL군(5.50 ± 1.08 N, 36.08%)이 LB군 (20.54 ± 11.89 N, 47.19%)에 비해 낮은 값을 보였다(P < .05). 주사전자현미경 분석 결과, AL군은 patrix에서, LB군은 matrix에서 눈에 띄는 마모 및 변형이 관찰되었다. 결론: Locator는 새롭게 개발된 유지장치보다 높은 초기 유지력을 보인 반면 높은 유지력 소실량을 보였다. 한편, 두 가지 부가적인 유지장치는 반복적인 착탈 후에도 충분한 유지력을 가지는 것으로 나타났다.
Headache Characteristics in Rhinologic Patients and the Role of Surgical Treatment
최재원,김응호,류인선,임현우,송용진,여남경 대한비과학회 2015 Journal of rhinology Vol.22 No.1
Objectives:Even though headache is a common symptom in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or nasal septal deviation (NSD), there are very few recent reports investigating headache characteristics in rhinologic patients. Therefore, we investigated the headache characteristics and differences in CRS and NSD patients who were diagnosed by computerized tomography and endoscopic exams. Methods:We enrolled 257 patients who had undergone nasal and sinus surgery between January 2012 and December 2013. The subjects were divided into a CRS group (n=147) and NSD group (n=110). They were asked to fill out a Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) and questionnaire about pre-operation headaches (1 day prior) and post-operation headaches (1 month after) they experienced, to evaluate their sinonasal symptoms and headache characteristics. Results:There was no significant pre-operative difference in rhinologic symptoms and headache characteristics between the CRS and NSD groups. Females experienced more headaches. Both groups reported significant improvements to their headaches after surgery; however, we found no significant differences in the degree of improvement between the two groups. Conclusions:There was no significant difference in the headache characteristics and the degree of post-operative improvement between the CRS and NSD groups. Surgical treatments appear to reduce headaches in patients with rhinologic diseases.