http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
漢城銀行의 經營權, 大株主 구성 추이와 日本人銀行化 과정
정태헌(Jung Tae-Hern) 한국사연구회 2010 한국사연구 Vol.148 No.-
The Hans?ng Bank can be regarded as an ideal case study in terms of the types of banks owned by Koreans under colonial capitalism. The Hans?ng Bank was established in 1897 as a normal bank, and quickly showed signs of having the possibility of becoming the basis of the national economy. However, from 1903 onwards it was used as a subsidiary of the D aiichi Bank, its largest shareholder. After 1906, the Residency - General became the main actor involved in the control of the Hans?ng Bank. During the 1910s, or from the signing of the Korea-Japan Annexation Treaty onwards, the Hans?ng Bank enjoyed its heyday as it rapidly grew to become an 'aristocratic bank.' The bank was subsequently the target of a boycott during the March 1st Movement. However, its standing as a good example of the Government - General of Chos?n's policy with regards to the establishment of banks, and the fact that the Office of Yi Royal-Family (李王職) was its largest shareholder, ensured that the bank could overcome the crisis. However, the reputation of the Hans?ng Bank as an 'aristocratic bank' started to fade in the aftermath of its recapitalization in January 1920 and of its increased taking on of the characteristics of a Japanese bank. The golden era of the Hans?ng Bank came to an end during the 1920s as it faced a management crisis amidst epochal events such as the Great Depression and the Great Tokyo Earthquake of September 1, 1923. The Government - General of Chos?n decided to turn the Hans?ng Bank into a bank managed by the Japanese. At the end of 1925, Tsutsumi Nagaichi was appointed as the CEO and granted exclusive management rights of the bank. In March 1928, the Hans?ng Bank became a subsidiary of the Chosen Industrial Bank.
전시체제 초기 夢幻의 선전소재, 조선해협철도터널案 실상과 報道 실태
정태헌(Jung Tae-hern) 고려사학회 2021 한국사학보 Vol.- No.82
만주를 침략한 일본 육군은 세계 최초의 해저철도터널인 간몬(下關~門司)터널 건설을 밀어붙여 착공 계획을 확정하자마자 1935년 7월, 철도성과 내무성을 통해 ‘조선해협터널’ 계획안을 발표하도록 했다. 그러나 이는 기술수준, 재정적 뒷받침, 일본철도망과의 연결방법 등 구체성이 결여된 실현 불가능한 계획이었고, 일본철도망과의 궤간차이조차 고려하지 않은 미숙한 발상이었다. 1939년에 일본 혼슈 지역의 광궤(표준궤) 신간선 부설 계획과 조선해협터널을 연계시킨다는 구상이 제시되었지만 이후 다시 큐슈 지역의 협궤철도망을 연결역으로 설정하는 혼선을 벗어나지 못했다. 그러나 報國언론은 이 계획이 곧 이뤄질 것처럼 반복선전하면서 ‘현실’로 만들어 일본에서 시작되는 ‘興亞’교통망을 찬양했다. 어쩔 수 없이 계획의 실현 불가능함이 노출되자 선전 소재로서 페이퍼 계획의 용도가 폐기(1942년 중단)될 때까지는 성사시켜야 한다는 사명감과 정신승리를 강조했다. 부실한 지질조사만 간헐적으로 진행되면서 페이퍼 계획상 터널입・출구가 수시로 바뀌는 동안 곳곳에서 일어난 입・출구 유치 운동은 해당 지역은 물론 독자들에게 침략전쟁에 빠져들도록 분위기를 조성하는 데 일조했다. 터널계획은 일본이 침략전쟁에 승승장구하는 것으로 비춰졌던 전시체제 초기에 ‘과학일본’의 ‘웅대한 힘’을 과시하는 몽환의 정치 선전 소재로 기능했다. The Japanese Army, which invaded Manchuria, confirmed its plan to build the world’s first undersea railway tunnel called the Kanmon Tunnel(Simonoseki~Monji). Straight afterwards the Japanese Army announced plans for the Joseon Strait Railway tunnel through the Ministry of Railways and the Ministry of the Interior in July 1935. This plan was an immature idea of linking it to the narrow-gauge railway, the Kanmon Tunnel, without considering the specificity of technology, financial support, and a means of connection with the Japanese railway network led by the Army’s impatience. It was not until 1939 that the project changed to link it to the Joseon Strait Tunnel when the plan to replace the Japanese mainline railway with a broad-gauge railway (a standard rail line) was established. However, the plan for the new broad-gauge railway was suspended in 1943 due to the deterioration of the war situation. The plan for the Joseon Strait Tunnel was also suspended in 1942 after a poor and intermittent geological survey. The plan for the Joseon Strait Railway Tunnel did not go beyond the level of the desk plan. However, ‘patriotic media’ advertised the plan loudly as if it would be accomplished soon and praised the plan as a transportation network that makes science Japan’s Asia prosperous. While the entrance and exit of the tunnel frequently changed by desk plans, the entrance and exit installation movement occurring in Joseon and Japan contributed to creating an atmosphere buried in the illusion of a war of aggression. In the end, the Joseon Strait Tunnel plan, which had no substance, served as a dreamy political propaganda tool that only imprinted readers with mental victory, a sense of duty, and justification.
남북 역사인식의 상호 변화와 를 통해 본 역사인식 연합'의 전망
정태헌(Jung, Tae-Hern) 국제고려학회 서울지회 2011 국제고려학회 서울지회 논문집 Vol.14 No.-
Learned circles of history of 21st century South and North Korea has to prepare methodology for 'Union of Historical perception' between South and North Korea in union of nations stage. this process can be connected with settlement for difference of Historical perception and peace building among each country in the Northeast Asia. examining the result of , against common expectations, South and North Korea Historical perceptions thinking about korean history before 1910s, have something in common with each other. Union of Historical perception, based on this kind of commonness, is that pursues methodology coexisting differences. With external changes such as the collapse of the Cold War, recognition for the Japanese Colonial Period, which has 'political difference' understanding history between South and North Korea, is changing after 1990s. South Korean scholars study about anti-japanese armed struggle of Kim il sung. therefore critical Historical perception based on fact is spreaded. North Korean scholars have memoir of Kim Il-Sung which emphasizes on the Union with the nationalist group. It has made the circumstances being able to reinterpret Juche Idea for peace and coexistence.
정태헌(Jung, Tae Hern) 역사비평사 2012 역사비평 Vol.- No.99
In order to accomplish a union between North and South Korea, a broadening of the homogenous historical understanding must be demanded, ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding,’ which is towards a methodology of coexisting with difference, is the essential element at this stage of Union between North and South Korea. It does not mean the absorption of a single historical understanding, which connotes a one-sided nature. Whether the period needed for union between North and South Korea is long or short, it will depend on the level of union between North and South Korean historical perception. Historical exchange will incrementally increase interchange according to the level of the relationship between South and North Korea, following steps such as ‘the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation’, ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’ and ‘the Period of Union between North and South Korea’. The main contents of history interchange during the Period of Reconciliation and Cooperation, whose first task is composing the foundation of exchange, should be an orientation towards outstanding historical questions shared by both North and South Korea. In addition, ‘The North and South Korean Committee for the Promotion Socio-Cultural Cooperation.’ as an organization that operates between South and North Korea authorities ‘The North and South Korean History Exchange Agreement.’ Likewise, ‘The Account for History Interchange Between North and South Korea’ by the Inter-Korean Cooperation Fund. In the North, the Ministry of Unification’s administration guide, which maintains an ‘anti-market’ policy and which that fails to provide research funds for North Korean scholars, should be changed. Following this an array of ‘cultural agreements’ can be signed between North and South Korean authorities marking ‘the Period of Peaceful Coexistence’. The primary theme of history exchange at this point should be the reexamination of political difference between each history so as to find signs for a methodology that can relieve hostilities. The founding of ‘The Inter-Korea Committee for Historical Interchange and Promotion’ as well as subcommittees classified by each subject of exchange is demanded. Henceforth the biggest theme of history exchange is the completion of the methodology of ‘The North-South Korean Union for Historical Understanding’ and reaching the level of cooperation where ‘The Joint North-South Korean Commission on History’ can compile a collaborated historical outline publication.
조선총독부의 慶尙合同銀行 경영권 장악 과정과 일본인은행으로의 흡수
정태헌(Jung Tae-hern) 고려사학회 2010 한국사학보 Vol.- No.40
The Gyeongsang Amalgamated Bank was created as a result of the merger of the Daegu Bank and Gyeongnam Bank on July 31<SUP>st</SUP>, 1928. The bank's operational rights were eventually assumed by the Government-General of Joseon(Korea), with the end & result being its amalgamation with the Japanese-owned Hanseong Bank on October 1st, 1941. A look at the history of the Gyeongsang Amalgamated Bank exhibits some of the commonly found characteristics of banks owned by Joseon(Korea) nationals during the Japanese colonial period. More to the point, although Joseon people invested in the establishment of banks nationwide in the 1910s, these institutions became subject to mergers after their operational rights were assumed by the Government-General of Joseon during the 1920s. For instance, the Government-General of Joseon forced the Daegu and Gyeongnam Banks to merge in 1927 by employing a strategy that involved decreasing the funds available to Joseon-owned banks, thereby facilitating its ability to 'designate' the management group and ensure the presence of Japanese nationals within this group. Although shareholders such as Jeong Jaehak managed to drag negotiations on for two years, Yamada Naohide (山田直秀) was eventually able to grasp operational rights in September 1930. While Min Daesik and Ogura Takenosuke (小倉武之助) respectively became the largest shareholders in 1934 and 1939, the Gyeongsang Amalgamated Bank was nevertheless ultimately merged with the Hanseong Bank, thus ending its existence as a Joseon-owned bank.
1998년 소떼방북, ‘21세기 한반도’ 대전환의 문을 연 메가이벤트
정태헌(Jung Tae-hern) 역사비평사 2015 역사비평 Vol.- No.112
Chung Ju-yung, an entrepreneur who made his first visit to North Korea on January 23, 1989, made his second visit to the Joint Security Area of Panmunjeom with five hundred head of cattle on June 16, 1998. He had worked for 20 years to find a way to link Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation with the Northern Economic Zone. This was not only for the purpose of instigating a new phase in Korea’s national history, but also for commercial profit. However, as Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation proceeded, South Korea came under the IMF Management System and North Korea had economic sanctions imposed by the US government. Because of this, only two projects among many were agreed to by both Koreas’ and initiated by Chung’s humanitarian visits with cattle; the Mt. Geumgang tour program and establishment of the Gaeseong Industrial Complex. The progress of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation has fluctuated according to several factors, e,g., the global financial crisis, the short-sighted viewpoint of conservative forces in South Korea, US sanctions against North Korea, and the topdown management structure of the Hyundai Group. Therefore the question is, who has the authority and responsibility to stabilize Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation and of resolving these problems? The answer does not lie with the Hyundai company but with the President of South Korea who is ready to proceed with “the peaceful reunification of the fatherland” under the constitution.
특집 : 평화와 통일의 사건사; 1980년대 정주영의 탈이념적 남북경협과 북방경제권 구상
정태헌 ( Tae Hern Jung ) 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2013 民族文化硏究 Vol.59 No.-
1970년대 말 이후 1980년대를 지나는 동안 모색된 정주영의 남북경협-북방경제권 구상은 남한 내수시장 또는 수출상품 생산에 필요한 원자재 및 상품 공급기지로서의 북한과 ‘무진장한 자원의 보고’인 시베리아와 만주를 아우른 것이었다. 1989년 1월 그의 첫 방북은 남북관계를 풀어가는 과정에서 애매하고 수동적 입장을 벗어나지 못한 국가의 ‘무능함’에 기대지 않고 자유기업론자로서 적극적으로 ‘북한 열기’를 시도한 것이었다. 정주영은 한국경제의 생산력 저하라는 현실 앞에서 분단의 장벽을 넘어 동북아 대륙에서 민간이 주도하는 자유기업이 활개를 펼 수 있는 조건을 만들고 창의력을 발휘해 장애요인을 돌파하려 했던 ‘상식적’ 기업인이었다. 그러나 상식적 기업인이 한 사람뿐이었다는 것은, 한국사회 냉전의 뿌리가 얼마나 깊고 한국 기업의 내공이 얼마나 낮은 수준인가를 반증한다. As the 1980s passed Chung Ju-yung suggested that North-south economic union and Northern economic zone initiative would connect North Korea and the "limitless vault of natural resources" in Siberia and Manchuria to the South Korean domestic market and to demand for raw materials required for the production of goods and products for export. In Chung``s first visit to the North in January of 1989, he bypasses the ambiguous and passive process of the government`s ``incompetent" to disentangle North-South relations in order to pursue a plan of "opening North Korea" along the principle of free enterprise. Faced with the realities of the Korean economy`s reduction in productivity, Chung quality as a creative and commonsensical businessman can be seen in his push to overcome the wall of national division and confront the mitigating factors in order to create a place on the Asian continent where free enterprises led by the people could unfold. However, this commonsense businessman was only one person, the roots of the Cold War in Korean society were deep and Korea industry`s low level of retrocedence indicates as much.