http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 정정호 ( Chung Ho Chung ) (검색결과 79 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
정정호,노창균,정건명,윤명오,Chong, Chong-Ho,Noh, Chang-Kyun,Chung, Kun-Myung,Youn, Myung-Ou 해양환경안전학회 2006 해양환경안전학회지 Vol.12 No.4
우리 정부와 해운기업은 해상에서의 인명 및 환경보호를 위해 노력하고 있지만 아직까지 내항선에서의 안전관리가 미흡하여 내항선에 맞는 체계적이고 현실적인 안전관리체제 운영의 내실화 방안이 절실하다. 본 논문은 관련기관 및 해운기업에 설문조사를 하였으며, 실증분석을 통하여 현 내항선안전관리의 문제점을 파악하고 개선하여 우리나라 내항해운에 적합한 안전관리체제의 내실화 방안을 제시하고자 한다. We badly need the plans to promote practical and systematic utilization of safety management system as the safety management in coasters is not yet sufficient although the government and shipping companies are making efforts to protect human life and environment in ocean. This thesis executed questionnaire survey on related organizations and shipping companies followed by proof analysis and suggest plans to make it useful safety management system suitable to coastal marine transport of the country through grasping and improving the points of problems in current safety management on coastwise vessels.
-
정정호 ( Chung Ho Chung ) 한국비교문학회 2010 比較文學 Vol.51 No.-
The aim of this paper is to discuss the comparative method in the practical field of John Dryden`s literary criticism. John Dryden(1631-1700) is properly considered as "the father of English criticism" and "the writer who first taught us to determine upon principles the merit of composition" by another great literary critic, Samuel Johnson in the Eighteenth century. Dryden was truly a man of letters in the latter part of the Seventeenth century England: a poet, playwright, critic, and translator. He wrote various kinds of writings in the great tradition of English Empiricism. He was a so-called poet-critic who was not a purely literary critic but an utterly practical critic. He wrote his literary criticism only on the basis of his various experiences as a writer in general. He was never a theoretical or speculative critic, compared with the prescriptive French critics in the age of Neoclassicism in Europe. Dryden deals with his literary discourse by comparing Greek and Roman writers with Italian, French and English poets. Dryden`s comparative method enhances awareness of difference, from country to country and age to age. Dryden tries to establish the proper identity of English literature in the whole history of European literature from the Greek period to his contemporary period. His method of comparison in his literary criticism hada strong influence on the later English literary critics such Samuel Johnson and T. S. Eliot. Dryden set up the great tradition of comparative method in the history of English literary criticism. Now our era is the age of glocalism and cosmopolitanism, when the ethics of comparison is badly needed. The comparative method in literary criticism could be the comparative criticism in the widest sense of comparative literature. It is the very great legacy of John Dryden`s criticism for the 21st century.
-
송욱의 문학연구와 비교방법론 재고 : 세계시민주의 시대의 한국비교문학을 위한 하나의 시론(試論)
정정호(Chung Chung-ho) 韓國批評文學會 2009 批評文學 Vol.- No.34
Wook Song(1925-1980) was the first comparativist in the latter part of the 20th-century literary studies in Korea. He published several major scholarly books on comparative methodology, poetics and criticism in the 1960's and 70's. He approached to literary background and philosophical interrelations between Korean and Chinese thought, East Asian and Western, and Korean and the Western literature in terms of comparative method. His comparative studies did start comparative poetics and thought in literary criticism and literature in Korea. Now we are living in the age of globalization and cosmopolitanism, and we need to learn Song's exemplary comparative method in literary studies for the comparative world literature. The aim of this paper thus is to discuss his pioneering comparative practice in the field of literary and cultural studies. From Song's comparative performance in his concrete critical and literary activities, I will submit several memos to Korean Comparative Literature in the 21st century. First we need to institutionalize comparative literature at undergraduate and graduate level in Korean University. Second, we have to establish the comparative method as the interdisciplinary and consilient approach in the crisis of the Humanities. Third, We'd better form an academic community of Korea, China and Japan to challenge the Euro-centered comparative literary and cultural studies. Fourth, we may start International Association of World literature to promote the cooperation of Non-Western literatures. Fifth, we may develop the close ties between comparative literature and cultural studies in the literary departments. To achieve this long-awaited project successfully, we now must study Wook Song as comparativist in a more detailed and concrete way.
-
영국인 정체성 형성 기제에 드러난 민족주의의 증상과 불안
정정호(Chung, Chung Ho),한우리(Han, Woo Ri) 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소 2013 영미연구 Vol.29 No.-
This article examines how the anxiety and symptom of the British imperial century are exposed in the early spy novels published in Britain during the early 1900's. In The Secret Agent (1907) and The Thirty-Nine Steps (1915), Joseph Conrad and John Buchan describe a defense of the British society to counter the invasion of 'the Other' and foreign enemies. To be specific, both spy novels doubt with paranoia on the contamination of 'Englishness' by depicting the enemies as monstrous figures. However, a defense enervates and turns out an impossible project since it is difficult to set up a boundary which distinguishes between the British self and the Other. Thus, the anxiety that haunts both texts is not a fear of the Other but a fear of the same; and these espionage activities between the First World countries actually connect rather than divide Britain and its rival Europe. The European male rivals cause a fear to a British male protagonist with camouflages in both spy novels. The class, gender, racial Other who can not be identified with the British male counterpart in both texts are erased and silenced in the other dark side of the texts, exposing the impossibility of British identity formation mechanism.
-
사무엘 존슨과 18세기 계몽주의 공적 지식인의 초상: 21세기 융복합 시대의 새로운 통섭적 지식인을 향하여
정정호 ( Chung Ho Chung ) 한국18세기영문학회 2009 18세기영문학 Vol.6 No.2
The aim of this paper is to discuss Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) as a most representative public intellectual in the 18th-century England. It seems to me that we need badly a public intellectual like Johnson in this age of functional specialization. Many literary scholars and humanities intellectuals now stick to their ivory tower separated from the secular realities of the world. They tend to be secluded technical producer of academic papers for the very small number of professionals. They cannot reach the society and history to which they belong. This is the very beginning of the so-called "Crisis of the Humanities." We can discuss Dr. Johnson as public intellectual in three aspects. First of all, Johnson was a great scholar critic. As T. S. Eliot pointed out, Johnson was "one of the three greatest critics of poetry in English literature" (162) including John Dryden and S. T. Coleridge. The very essences of his criticism come from wide knowledge and acute understanding of language, close reading strategy, historical imagination and deep understanding of the humanities. Secondly, Johnson was a great prolific writer called "Great Cham of Literature" by Tobias Smollett. He read a wide range of books with various topics. Thirdly, Johnson was not a narrow specialist but an open-minded generalist who had a wide variety of intellectual curiosities and convergent or consilient methods. In other words, Johnson was really a public intellectual in the civil society of the 18th-century England with a vision of common reader, common culture and common humanities. How can we thresh Dr. Johnson as a critical intellectual for the 21st century? We can propose nine tentative memos as follows: (1) understanding importance of language in the humanities, and integration and interpenetration of language and literature; (2) the restoration of power of literature for the concrete life and society; (3) expanding the frontier of literary genres for the establishing the wisdom literature; (4) the return of dialogical imagination for the effective communication and comparison; (5) reestablishment of British literary tradition with balance, toleration and golden mean; (6) development of the convergent or consilient humanities; (7) reinvention of public intellectual with wise reading and critical consciousness; (8) avoidance of the philistinism and specialized professionalism; and (9) the pursuit of the whole man including spiritual problem in this age of rationalistic instrumentalism. In order to build a new convergent or consilient humanities in the public sphere for the 21st century we have to redraw and reproduce the portrait of Dr. Samuel Johnson as public intellectual in the year of tricentenary anniversary of his birth.
-
-
-
정정호 ( Chung Ho Chung ) 한국영미문화학회 2008 영미문화 Vol.8 No.3
The aim of this paper is to examine and evaluate Dr. Johnson`s view of text as performance in his hermeneutic critical perspective. Johnson does not believe in the purely ontological or autotelic aspects of literature, but rather understands literature in terms of hermeneutics: critical procedures are basically performances. Johnson steadily insists upon the truthfulness and veracity of all writing. He firmly believes that literature is valuable only if it communicates the truth about the nature of reality. He regularly reflects on the relationship of the author`s life to his work psychologically or genetically, and more occasionally that of the work to its genre, even though he distrusts rigorous theories of genre. As Hermeneutic assumes the existence of true meaning of a text, so literary criticism tries to discover the specific meaning of any literary text produced by its author. Johnson was a long way from the Absolutist or dogmatist Neoclassical Rationalism. For example, it is very dangerous to forget the empirical bases for Johnson`s criticism. The rejection of the Unities is the most famous instance of Johnson`s empirical approach in action. Johnson`s rejection of the Neoclassical rationalist rule of the Unities remains the prime example of his empirical approach and it was final. But with all his empirical bias Johnson never fell linto the anarchy of experience. He found out a new way of literary interpretation in the tradition of hermeneutics. As a practitioner of most forms of literary criticism, Johnson stands at just the right historical crossroads to be peculiarly valuable for us. Johnson no longer looks like a violent battleground between Classicism and Pre-Romanticism. Johnson is a kind of confluence between these two great currents of English criticism, undisturbed by his clear-sighted perception of the limitations of Neo-Classicism, and unfascinated by new experiments of a domination Pre-Romantics. This relative independence from literary movements has its advantages. And this is another reason for the greatness and authority of Johnson as a critic in term of modern hermeneutics.
-
-
ScienceON
코리아스칼라연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
