朝鮮後期 鄕村支配機構와 收租地의 減縮

정이근 동아대학교 부설 사회과학연구소 1992 사회과학논집 Vol.9 No.-

학교폭력 가해학생에 대한 조치의 병과 가능성과 적용상 문제점 검토 -「학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률」 제17조를 중심으로 -

정이근 전북대학교 동북아법연구소 2016 동북아법연구 Vol.10 No.2

학교폭력 사안의 처리 실무에서는 가해학생에 대한 “선도·교육적 효과”를 이유로 법률이 정하고 있지 않는 조치를 병과 하는 사례가 빈번하여 가해학생의 자유와 권리를 위법하게 침해하는 상황에 이르고 있다. 법률이 규정하고 있지 않은 조치를 병과 함으로써 가해학생 및 학부모가 학교장의 조치에 납득하지 못하여 행정심판이나 행정소송을 제기하는 사례도 교육과학기술부의 행정해석과 무관하지 않다고 판단된다. 교육과학기술부의 행정해석은 학교폭력예방법 제17조 제2항 및 제4항이 규정한 특별한 경우를 고려하지 아니하고 제17조 제1항의 해석을 통하여 가해학생에 대한 조치의 병과 가능성을 무제한으로 인정하고 있다. 이러한 행정해석은 일선 학교의 자치위원회 의사결정 과정에 그대로 반영되어 가해학생의 권리를 위법하게 침해하는 현실적 상황을 초래하고 있다. 이에, 논문은 학교폭력 가해학생에 대한 조치의 법적 근거를 중심으로 법률 조문의 객관적 의미를 살피고 법률 문언의 객관적 의미에 따른 조치의 병과 가능성, 실무에서 위법한 병과 조치가 이루어지는 중요한 근거가 되는 행정해석과 그 적용상 문제점, 가해학생에 대한 병과 조치의 가능 여부를 판단할 수 있는 기준으로서 특히 법의 해석과 관련된 법리에 대하여 검토하였다. 결론적으로, 가해학생의 선도 및 교육 과정도 적법하고 타당하여야 함을 인식하여야 하고, 가해학생에 대한 선도·교육이라는 명분으로 법률이 정한 의미를 초월하여 임의로 확대 및 유추 해석하여 그 조치를 병과 할 수는 없어야 할 것이다. 법문의 의미를 넘어 그 조치의 병과를 인정함은 가해학생에 대한 선도·교육의 이름표를 단 비교육적 조치를 조장하는 결과를 초래하는 것이다. 나아가 법 해석의 일반원칙을 위반하고 법적 안정성을 해침으로써 법치주의 원리를 훼손하는 것이다. 학교폭력 가해학생에 대한 조치의 위법한 병과 가능성에 대한 교육부의 행정해석 변경과 일선 학교에 대한 지도가 시급하다고 판단한다. In the practice of school violence case, because of heighten the ‘guide and educational effect’, so there are many cases of parallel disciplinary measures, it breach the law provision and violate the liberties and rights of wrongdoer students. As far as without legal ground, the parallel disciplinary measures for a school violence wrongdoer student can not obtain persuasion power from students or his/her parents, so it frequently get into administrative litigation. Indeed, it mainly because of the administrative interpretation of the Ministry of Education for the article 17 of the School Violence Prevention and Countermeasure Related Law(SVPCRL). The administrative interpretation of the Ministry of Education did not consider that special case of 2nd provision and 4th provision of article 17 of the SVPCRL, and through the interpretation of 1st provision of article 17 of the SVPCRL, it permitted parallel disciplinary measures for wrongdoer student without limitation. These attitude of the administrative interpretation of the Ministry of Education affected to the result of deliberation of the school self-governing committee, so frequently caused cases of breach legal rights of wrongdoer students. So, this research focus on the legal grounds of disciplinary measures for school violence wrongdoer student. And this paper’s contents includes objective meaning of those provisions of the law, possibility of parallel disciplinary measures in accordance with objective meaning of legal provisions, related the administrative interpretation and related actual problems and law interpretation related legal theories. Finally, we have to correct understand that guidance and education course must be lawfulness and validity for school violence wrongdoer student, and should not be beyond the meaning of legal provisions in interpretation. If we permit that expansion and analogical interpretation of the legal provisions, it will be result in inappropriate in education. Moreover, it will result in breach of general principle of interpretation of law, damage the principle of legal stability, and eventually would destroy the principle of rule of law. I think that the administrative interpretation of Ministry of Education about on the possibility of parallel disciplinary measures for wrongdoer student must be change without delay.

朝鮮初期 軍戶의 編成方式에 대한 一考察

정이근 동아대학교 부설 사회과학연구소 1996 사회과학논집 Vol.13 No.-

맑스 자본주의 이행이론의 전환

정이근 부경대학교 인문사회과학연구소 2004 인문사회과학연구 Vol.4 No.-

國家的 封建制에 대한 一考察

정이근 東亞大學校 大學院 1991 大學院論文集 Vol.16 No.-

The purpose of this paper is to get a concept of national feudalism which is a particular type of feudalism as mode of production. (1) Mode of production is unity of mode of labour(the aspect of productivity) and relations of production, that is, relations of production. (2) Feudal landed property is the core of the feudalism. The economic content of feudal landed property is as follow: 1) the producers have a direct cohesion with means of production while they are binded to the land. 2) the feudalistic landowner exploits the feudal rent through non-economic compulsion. 3) the producers are independent upon the feudalistic landowner in the process of production. 4) therfore the basic relations of production in feudalism are that of the feudalistic landowner to the feudalistic producers. (3) The economic law of feudalism is the system that exploits the surplus productions as feudal rent through non-economic compulsion. The basic contradiction of feudalism can be descrived by the relations between the private characteristics in the process of production and feudal landed property. (4) The Middle Ages in Asia can be characterized as national feudalism, which involves the essence of feudalism in general as follows : 1) the existence of the small farmers that have to be distinguished from serfs. 2) the exitence of the nation as the feudalistic landowner. 3) the local organization of government exercising non-economic compulsion. Therfore the land-tax is feudal rent. (5) The particularity of national feudalism : 1) the farmers under national feudalism are difficult to stand on his own legs. 2) the private-landowners have not only the interdepent relationship but also the antagonistic one to the nation that is the highest landowner. Therefore the relationship between the nation, the private landowner and the farmer are complex. (6) Transition from national feudalism to capitalism : despotic power in national feudalism plays a obstructing role in the process of primitive accumulation.

동아시아의 경제발전과 금융·경제위기

정이근 동아대학교 부설 사회과학연구소 1999 사회과학논집 Vol.16 No.-

중국의 입법체계와 입법 간 충돌의 해결원칙

정이근 한중법학회 2012 中國法硏究 Vol.17 No.-

This thesis focus on the Legislative Law of China, and reviewed the authorities of legislative organs, hierarchy of law, principles for conflict of legal norms and several problems of regulation system for legal norms. In related to the legislative system and principles for conflict of legal norms, the Legislative Law of China works most important role, in this circumstance, the Legislative Law of China adopt the principle of higher level are superior to any law at lower levels, special law prevail over general law and new law prevails over old law. In China, except for these principles, there are others methods for resolution for conflict of legal norms, i. e. ratifying system for legal norms, recording system for legal norms, modifying or cancel system for legal norms and awarding system. In addition to these system, there exist interpretation methods and it also works for legislative unitary. Despite of using these system, Chinese legal supervision system has many problems. It contains several related problems that the limitation of ability of the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee, lack of effective legal supervision procedure, and the regulation system for legal norms by courts can not operate effectively. In Korea, the Constitutional Court exercise the right to adjudication on the constitutionality of the laws, and every courts can review administrative norms, in this point, there exist a typical difference between Korea and China. In these reasons, many Chinese scholars persist that China needs toadopt judicial regulation system for legal norms.

화학비료의 발전 방향

정이근,이춘수,임동규 한국토양비료학회 1994 한국토양비료학회 심포지움 Vol.- No.-

중국의 입법기관과 입법권 행사상의 문제점

정이근 한중법학회 2010 中國法硏究 Vol.14 No.-

This thesis focus on the exercise legislative competence of legislative authorities and legal problems in legislative procedures of the People’s Republic of China. Especially in the exercise of legislative competence, this paper review the role and function of the NPC(National People’s Congress) and SCNPC(Standing Committee of National People’s Congress), in this process, it will concludes other legislative authorities’ competence and function. That is not only conclude the NPC and SCNPC, but also the scope expand to the State Council, each People’s Congress, and Special Economic Zone. The legislative power is one of the most important competence of the State legislative authorities. According to the Constitution and the Legislative Law, in principle, the NPC and SCNPC exclusively exercise the power of legislation. In legislative procedures, NPC presidium and SCNPC chairman meeting play central role. Actually the State Council and its component ministries and commissions are the potent force in China’s legislation. Actually, Legislative principles of the Constitution and Legislative Law are very important and plays central role. But In generally, Constitution is characterized by generality and flexibility or skeletal. And even though the Legislative Law provides some exclusive articles about legislative competence, in many case, because of the NPC and SCNPC laws are skeletal, there exist large room for interpretation and clarification by administrative regulations and ministerial rules. In that result, the State Council exercise most of the legislative competence; National People’s Congress(NPC) legislative competence, eventually, there exist a dangerous that local rules or local regulations replace the NPC and SCNPC laws.

맑스 자본주의이행이론의 전환

정이근 부경대학교 인문사회과학연구소 2004 인문사회과학연구 Vol.4 No.-