http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
전찬일 충남대학교 인문과학연구소 2007 인문학연구 Vol.34 No.2
This study aims to raise some questions towards the blindness or one-sidedness connected with 'reading a film' which this writer has experienced for the past 14 years or so as a film critic, since he started 'studying cinema' almost 25 years ago. As a matter of fact, 'Reading a Film' is just one way of watching and enjoying a filmic text more interestingly and meaningfully. In reality, however, the situation is not always such that. The purpose and the reason that we should read a film are forgotten and the case happens very often that reading a film becomes the very purpose of watching it, especially among the film experts, to his regret. He never wants to insist on the uselessness of reading a film at all. For it can be the useful, probably best way to watch a film more affluently, that is to say 'more pleasantly'. The problem is not reading a film in itself, but reading it 'blindly'. In order to get at the purpose of this study, this writer will bring and use the concept and term 'attraction/s', originated from the 'montage of attractions' of the great Russian film-maker and film & theatre theoretician, Sergei M. Eisenstein. According to Eisenstein, “An attraction (in our diagnosis of theatre) is any aggressive moment in theatre, i.e. any element of it that subjects the audience to emotional or psychological influence, verified by experience and mathematically calculated to produce specific emotional shocks in the spectator in their proper order within the whole.(...) I regard the attraction as being in normal conditions an independent and primary element in structuring the show, a molecular (i.e. compound) unity of the effectiveness of theatre and of theatre as a -whole.” Of course the definition of attraction from Eisenstein's 'montage of attractions' is true of cinema almost exactly, too. Therefore, we can say that an attraction in cinema is every cinematic element that subjects the audience to emotional or psychological influence, in other words attracts the audience at any strength and degree by any cinematic visual or/and sound or/and narrative etc.. As an example of watching a film with the 'attraction', this writer focuses on one of the most anticipated but flopped films in the year 2005, <Duelist> directed by Myoung-Se Lee. By means of attraction, <Duelist> may be really 'something new & different' among the many so-so Korean popular movies, contrary to the lots of negative opinions towards the attractive movie. In writing this article, this writer keeps in mind as the main readers his former students who wanted to go deep inside the film world more or so. In that respect, this article is a humble proposal for the beginners who wants to study 'cinema in general'.