http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
전재성(Chaesung Chun) 고려대학교 일민국제관계연구원 2006 국제관계연구 Vol.11 No.1,2
Efforts to expand the scope of security give us a new way to think about the situation of being "secure," which means being "free from worries and anxieties." Now we have more sophisticated ideas about the source of security, issue-areas of threat, and the victims of threat. The purpose of this article is to look at the human security agenda from gendered and East Asian perspectives. This paper notes that feminist analysis of human security might begin with the recognition that we view societal concepts and institutions with different lenses, depending on our consciousness and our positions in society. Starting from experiences of females as the point from which to examine human security and human rights, different questions and frameworks become important. Gender must be also be analyzed in relation to other factors such as region, nationality, race, and class. While human security and human rights of women have been systematically underanalyzed and underestimated, the failure to give priority to women's human rights and security may be an incomplete approach from the start. This article first examines the relationship between the concept of human security and the feminist approach. The paper then goes on to analyze the global standard of gendered human security and the case of European Union, which appears to be one of the most developed approaches. Finally, it looks at the Asian and Korean approach toward women's insecurity, and also at how APEC and the Korean government have tried to deal with this issue.