韓國 近代小說에 있어서의 時間意識

張師善 개신어문학회 1981 개신어문연구 Vol.1 No.-

남북한 자연주의 문학론 비교 연구

장사선 국어국문학회 2002 국어국문학 Vol.- No.130

남북한 실존주의문학 수용 비교 연구

장사선 韓國比較文學會 2001 比較文學 Vol.27 No.-

Existentialism started to be accepted by philosophers of Shin Nam-cheol, Park Jong-hong and others from 1920 to 1930 in Korea. After the independence from Japan, Kim Dong-seok, Yong Byeong-sik, and other critics regarded Existentialism as worth deliberation and thought about applying it to Korean Literature. From 1948, North and South Korean critics shows absolutely different attitueds to the Existentialism. Son Woo-seong, Yang Byeong-sik, Kim Bung-gu, Jeong Myeong-whan in South, Kim Gyeong-ho, Gye book, Lee Sang-hyeong, Park Young-geun in North took the lead in developing and criticizing the theory. The understanding of Existentialism of both sides are totally different, so they show a lot of opposing viewpoint through the whole aspects. Specially, their main opposing parts are the object of Existentialism, individualism, freedom, nihilism and anti-realism. South critics put the object of Existentialism on escaping out of the contradictions of life which is full of absurdities and abolishing the interval between thinking and acting, so they try to improve individual freedom. On the contrary, North critics think of Existentialism as the theory that was made to decrease masses' revolutionary ideas. In North Korea, existentialism place the focus more on the selfishness and isolationism than individual freedom. South existentialist also indicated that it cannot be the way to overcome the feeling of uneasiness. And they considered Existentialism as Individualism or Sentimentalism. To existentialist, freedom is not what we have to seek and obtain but what we are given. This notion prevailed among South Korea critics. To North Korean critics, however, freedom is just a void illusion and the concept of freedom in Existentialism is also entirely illusion. And freedom is for the interests of Bourgeoisie and it support Fascism. Both of them criticize Existentialism of Heidegger and Sartre and they believe that it cause only nihilism. Even though their explanations seem to be apparently similar, but they have different viewpoints on the acception of nihilism. "To be driven to despair" is the point of view of North' and "To overcome it" is for South'. Existentialism is inevitably anti-realism, because it is fundamentally ideologic, accidental, individual. Therefore this anti-realism is usually pointed out and regarded as natural not only by North critics but also by South critics. By the way, some existentialists in South Korea says that it is realistic because it has the feature of engagement and resistance. But basically, realistic feature of Existentialism cannot be argued. Existentialism had expectations for the relief of crowd, eventually it wasn't achieved. Everybody knew that the recovery was impossible. But the fact was overlooked that existentialism didn't have any way to relieve the anxiety and appeal not to the reason of masses but to the feeling, so they dazzled most of crowd. Therefore existentialism should be regarded as passing ideology to comfort people in desperate situation. But such a opinion didn't prevail in both sides, North & South.

남북한 모더니즘의 수용 양상 비교 연구

장사선 한국비교문학회 2004 比較文學 Vol.0 No.34

Modernism started to be acepted by Go, Han-yong and Kim, Eok,from 1924. in Korea. In 1930' and 1950'. Post-Modernism started prevailedfrom the midle of 1980' in South Korean literature. In NorthKorea, after190, post-modernism criticaly acepted by Bak, Jong-sik.Many criticsregarded modernism as worth deliberation and thought aboutaplying it oKorean Literature.From 1950, North and South Korean critics hows absolutely diferentatitueds to the modernism. Mun, Deok-so and Kim, Yong-jikin South,Kim Hae-gyun, Kim, Ha-myung, Park Joung-sik, Sin, Young-nam in Northtok the lead in developing and criticizing the theory.The understanding of modernism of both sides are totaly different, sothey show a lot of oposing viewpoint hrough the whole aspects. Specialy, their main oposing parts are the object of modernism,anti-realism, political view and revolution, new methods of literature ordestrution of literature, nationalism or internationalism, secand halfcapitalism.South critics put he object of modernism on revolution of literature,so they try to improve formal experiments. On the contrary, North criticsthink of modernism as the theory that was made to decrease masses'revolutionary ideas.Modernism is inevitably anti-realism, because it is fundamentalyanti-ideologic, acidental, individual. Therefore this anti-realism is usualypointed out and regarded as natural not only by North criticsbut also bySouth critics. By the way, al modernists in South and North Korea saysthat it is anti-realistic because it has the feature of anti-rationalism and anti-science.

엄호석 논

장사선 국제어문학회 2002 국제어문 Vol.26 No.-

엄호석론(嚴浩奭論)

장사선 국제어문학회 2002 국제어문 Vol.26 No.-

한국문학에 나타난 사랑(Ⅲ)

張師善 弘益大學校 東西文化硏究所 1994 東西文化硏究 Vol.2 No.-

I attempted to discover the love themes in classical Korean literature in this study. The love themes in classical Korean litrerary works are to be classified into four types. They are 1)love and moral, 2)love and enjoyment, 3)love and money, 4)love and suffer. Unyongjeon, Chunhyangjeon, Leechunpoongjeon, Mujong, Sarang, Sunaebo, Chayubuin, and kyeowoolyeoja are the typical works of the first type. Pyeonkangsyojeon, Mulebanga, Whabun, and Punnyo are the typical works of the secand types. Changhanmong, Paekchiadada Kamja, Sonagi, Pong are the third types. Fourth type is mostly related to the soldiers in the war especially Japanese army in world war Ⅱ and American army in Korean war. The former is expressed by Yaho, Wolyesojeon, and the latter is expressed by Punji, Haebyuk.

조지훈 문학의 미적 사유 방식

임옥규,장사선 弘益大學校 人文科學硏究所 1999 東西文化硏究 Vol.7 No.-

This dissertation attempts an analysis of the aesthetic cogitation method of Cho Ji-hun's literature. Cho Ji-hun's inner world provides the basis for his poetry. These are discovered in the poesie of his poetics and comments on literature. His poetics were influenced by both Oriental and Western thought. As a man of foresight, his literature comments on the nature of society. The poesie of his poetics has the aspects of Dionysos and Pathos. A view of Cho's words find that he makes much of the essence of all subjects. The metaphysical recognition employed is derived from Oriental thought. His system of poetics represents an organic view of the world and ecocriticism. In this connection, spirit is superior to method and form. An ecological view of nature then, follows from Romantic theory. When life is seen through the lens of ecocrticism, this perspective of life takes on both aspects of Confucian realism and Chuang-tzu' transcendence of realism most particularly when Korea is concerned. Through his writing, Cho seeks a union between heaven and man. In all his works, Cho Ji-hun attempts to find a unifying Korean spirit.

『고려일보』 문예페이지 소설의 주제론적 연구 : CIS 지역 한국 관련 문예자료의 발굴 조사 연구 Ⅲ A study on the Literature related Korea in the CIS Ⅲ

장사선,우정권 우리말글학회 2004 우리말 글 Vol.30 No.-

The literary works of 『Seon-bong』, 『Lenin Gichi』 and 『Goryo Ilbo』 are meaningful as the archetype of Goryo tribe‘s Literature. The studies on the literary works of these papers will not be limited to the studies on emigration literature but also contribute to the searching of the real entity of emigration literature as well as finding the linkage to the North Korean literature. Most works are based on the praise for the revolution of socialism, but we can see warmth of human too, which is the universal sentiment of Korean people in them. Also, we can see that the praise for the Soviet Socialism Ideology was reluctantly made with the social atmosphere and regional environment at that time. Although the region and environment has changed, the racial sentiment of Han has not been lost but kept. And that‘s the own feature of CIS Goryo tribe’s literature.(HongIk University·Seoul National University)

한국문학에 나타난 사랑(Ⅰ)

張師善 弘益大學校 1991 弘大論叢 Vol.23 No.1

"Love Themes in Classical Works of Korean Literature" The main purpose of this study is to survey love themes in Korean classical literary works. "Hwangjoga" and "Kongmudohaga",the two oldest works of Korean Literature, are typical poems of love. But in the period of Three Kingdome and Unified Silla, only a few works contain love themes, perhaps because of the Buddhism. In the era of Koryo Dkynasty, two types of love constitute the main stream. One of them is the love of women who were deserted by their lovers. The other type is the love based on the carnal desires. Confucianism, which genearally leads to an ascetic life in the era of Chosun Dynasty, sometimes aroused lust in the covert love affairs.