國民所得의 槪念 : 국민소득의 개념

이현재 釜山大學校 商科大學 1958 釜山商大學報 : 부산대 Vol.4 No.2

經濟諸量間의 基本的關係 : 경제제량간의 기본적관계

이현재 釜山大學校 商科大學 1961 釜山商大學報 : 부산대 Vol.7 No.1

乘數理論과 加速度原理 : 승수이론과 가속도원리

이현재 釜山大學校 商科大學 1959 釜山商大學報 : 부산대 Vol.5 No.2

금융정책과 국제수지 균형에 관한 실증분석

이현재 淸州大學校 産業經營硏究所 2000 産業經營硏究 Vol.23 No.2

韓國의 經濟成長過程에 있어서의 國民所得構造 變動에 關한 硏究

李賢宰 서울大學校 商科大學 韓國經濟硏究所 1968 經濟論集 Vol.7 No.1

성인의 두뇌외상에 대한 임상적 관찰

이현재,조맹기,김윤,최길수,주정화,심보성 대한신경외과학회 1972 Journal of Korean neurosurgical society Vol.1 No.1

In modern society, characterized by variability of daily life, complicated industrial structure and surprizingly increased traffics, the danger of unexpected accident is always threatening the people. In America, for instance, almost 0.5% of the whole population annually suffers from head injury. About two thirds of traffic accident patients have head injury of various forms. Among the head injury patients due to traffic accidents, the commonest cause of death is head injury itself in about 70%. In this study, 585 cases of adult head injury patients over 15 years of age, observed at the Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital during the period from January, 1966 till September, 1971 were reviewed. 1) There were 4-17 men and 138 women; male female ratio was 3 : 1. 2) The commonest cause of head injury was traffic accident 037.3% of the total patients), A second common cause was "falls" (25.5%). 3) In skull fracture patients, vault fractures were twice as frequent as basal skull fractures. The incidence of simple fractures was remarkably higher than that of compound fractures, the ratio being 7 : 4. The incidence of linear fractures was slightly higher than that of depressed fractures, the ratio being 6 : 5. Most of linear fractures were simple fractures, but about 70% of depressed fractures were compound fractures. 4) Among the intracranial hemorrhagic lesions, subdural hematoma occupied about half of the total cases, most of whom were acute cases. The predilection site of subdural hematoma was the cerebral convexity (frontal, parietal and temporal areas'). The epidural hematoma, of which the predilection site was temporal area, occupied about 30% of the total intracranial hemorrhagic lesions. Temporal lobe was the predilection site of intracerebral hematoma. 5) About half of the patients with intracranial hemorrhagic lesions were accompanied by skull fractures. About 23% of the cases with skull fractures were accompaned by intracranial hemorrhagic lesions. 6) Altered consciousness was observed in about 90% of the total patients. Lucid interval was observed in 26% of the cases with intracranial hemorrhagic lesions. Vomiting occurred in a quarter of the total patients and early convulsive attacks were noticed in 5%. 7) Overall mortality rate of all the head injury patients was 12.3% and their operative mortality rate was 20.1%. The mortality rate in the patients with skull fractures was five times as high as in the patients without skull fractures. The mortality rate in the patients with intracranial hemorrhagic lesions was nearly three times as high as in those without. The mortality rate in the patients with linear skull fractures was about three times as high as in those with depressed skull fractures. 8) Sequelae were noticed in about half of the total patients. The most frequent one was postconcussion syndrome, the incidence being 36% of the total patients. 9) Associated injuries were found in about 10% of the total patients. The frequent ones were clavicle fracture, tibia/fibula fracture and mandible fracture, in order.

남북한 화폐통합 방안에 관한 연구

이현재 청주대학교 경영경제연구소 2012 경상논총 Vol.5 No.1

상속회복청구권에 있어서 진정상속인의 보호방안에 관한 연구

이현재 전남대학교 법학연구소 2008 법학논총 Vol.28 No.2

Civil Act, § 999 (Claim for Recovery of Inheritance), paragraph (1) provides that “if the right of inheritance is infringed by a person who pretends to have the right of inheritance, the person who has the right of inheritance or his agent by law may bring an action for recovery of inheritance.”, and paragraph (2) provides that “the claim for recovery of inheritance under paragraph (1) shall lapse at the expiration of three years from the date he comes to know the infringement, or ten years from the date the right of inheritance is infringed.” (Amended by Act No. 6591, Jan. 14, 2002). In this Article, I first explore the issue that the institution of the claim for recovery of inheritance does operate as that for a fake inheritor(a person who pretends to have the right of inheritance) rather than as that for real inheritor, because of the short statute of limitations provided at paragraph (2). Second, I then go on to discuss the legal nature on the claim for recovery of inheritance and case law. With respect to the legal nature, case law characterizes it as the gathering of the separate rights. According to case law, a real inheritor has only the cause of action for the claim for recovery of inheritance, but not for the separate rights, such as the claim for return of article owned(§ 213). Third, I study some possible effective methods for the prevention and the prohibition against actual evil practices that the claim for recovery of inheritance works for the fake inheritor. I argue that the claim for recovery of inheritance should work for real heirs as far as possible. Even if the Constitutional Court of Korea decided that the short term statute of limitations was unconstitutional on July 19, 2001(99Hun-Ma9), it, amended by Act No. 6591, Jan. 14, 2002, also may be unconstitutional because of the same reasons. In addition, I indicate that Supreme Court of Korea has interpreted a category of the fake inheritors narrowly or restrictively. Finally, I will argue that Civil Act, § 999, providing the claim for recovery of inheritance should be reviewed de novo and amended again, range from the requirements and the contents to the effects, in accordance with the purport of the legislation. Civil Act, § 999 (Claim for Recovery of Inheritance), paragraph (1) provides that “if the right of inheritance is infringed by a person who pretends to have the right of inheritance, the person who has the right of inheritance or his agent by law may bring an action for recovery of inheritance.”, and paragraph (2) provides that “the claim for recovery of inheritance under paragraph (1) shall lapse at the expiration of three years from the date he comes to know the infringement, or ten years from the date the right of inheritance is infringed.” (Amended by Act No. 6591, Jan. 14, 2002). In this Article, I first explore the issue that the institution of the claim for recovery of inheritance does operate as that for a fake inheritor(a person who pretends to have the right of inheritance) rather than as that for real inheritor, because of the short statute of limitations provided at paragraph (2). Second, I then go on to discuss the legal nature on the claim for recovery of inheritance and case law. With respect to the legal nature, case law characterizes it as the gathering of the separate rights. According to case law, a real inheritor has only the cause of action for the claim for recovery of inheritance, but not for the separate rights, such as the claim for return of article owned(§ 213). Third, I study some possible effective methods for the prevention and the prohibition against actual evil practices that the claim for recovery of inheritance works for the fake inheritor. I argue that the claim for recovery of inheritance should work for real heirs as far as possible. Even if the Constitutional Court of Korea decided that the short term statute of limitations was unconstitutional on July 19, 2001(99Hun-Ma9), it, amended by Act No. 6591, Jan. 14, 2002, also may be unconstitutional because of the same reasons. In addition, I indicate that Supreme Court of Korea has interpreted a category of the fake inheritors narrowly or restrictively. Finally, I will argue that Civil Act, § 999, providing the claim for recovery of inheritance should be reviewed de novo and amended again, range from the requirements and the contents to the effects, in accordance with the purport of the legislation.

연구자료의 검색효율 증대를 위한 개인화 검색 기법에 대한 연구 : 대학도서관 자료검색을 중심으로

이현재 한국사립대학교 도서관협의회 2013 사대도협회지 Vol.14 No.-

Web을 통한 정보자원의 검색 및 활용은 보편화 되어있다. 정보자원의 검색이 편리해지고 검색결과의 절대량은 많아지는 반면, 검색 결과에서 본인이 원하는 정보자원을 찾아내는 일은 더욱 어려워지고 있는 상황이다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 다양한 개인화 검색(personalized Search, 맞춤형 검색)에 대한 연구와 시스템 개발이 활발하게 진행되고 있다. 본 연구는 개인화 검색의 핵심 요소인 ‘명시적 선호정보(preference) 파악’을 통한 ‘검색 결과의 정확성(precision)향상’을 목표로 ‘대학’이라는 기관에 주목하여 연구를 진행하였다. 대학 내 연구자, 즉 교원의 교원연구정보와 대학도서관 소장자료의 주제정보를 활용하였다. 연구자의 선호정보를 ‘국가과학기술표준분류체계’를 활용하여 코드화한 ‘연구자 프로파일’ DB를 생성하고, 도서관 자료의 주제분류체계인 DDC와의 매핑을 통해 콘텐츠와의 연계점을 형성한다. 이후 시스템을 통한 검색 결과를 ‘연구자 프로파일’에 등록된 연구주제별로 클러스터링하고, 관심 키워드별로 리랭킹 (re-ranking)하는 기능을 제공함으로써 연구자료 검색 효율 향상을 도모한다. 이러한 과정을 통해 연구분야가 다른 연구자들에게 각자의 관심 주제분야에 해당하는 검색 결과를 우선적으로 제공할 수 있다.

매매를 원인으로 한 소유권이전등기 판결의 소송물과 기판력과의 관계

이현재 전남대학교 법학연구소 2015 법학논총 Vol.35 No.1

This thesis aims to explore the ways in which the objective scope of res judicata is determined with more consistent to the thorough interpretation of the stipulation in the Article 1, Clause 216 of the Civil Procedure Act. The traditional theory has followed the rule that the objective scope of res judicata is the same as the scope of the subject matter. As a result it caused the confusion in determining whether the cause of facts of the final judgement in the right to the request of ownership transfer registration having res judicata effects. Regarding this matter, it seems clear that the traditional theory does not answer to the question why the objective scope of res judicata does not correspond to the scope of the subject matter. Findings of this study reveal that the confusion caused by the existing theory has originated from the way of interpretation that highlights to the action of the res judicata rather than to focus on intrinsic meaning of the stipulation in the Article 1, Clause 216 of the Civil Procedure Act. Furthermore, this thesis is also against the argument that the objective scope of res judicata should extent to the grounds of registration expressed in the final judgement. It is clear that this argument contradicts to the current legal system which does not give public confidence of registration. This is also supported by the judicial precedent of the supreme court that gives only evidentialy effect of judgement to the cause of facts and not giving the res judicata. Finally, this study concludes that objective scope of res judicata does not extent to the “grounds of registration” in the final judgement, suggesting that the objective scope of res judicata “originating from” the final judgement is distinguished from the objective scope of res judicata “affecting the later lawsuit”. 이 논문은 판결 주문에 기재된 「매매를 원인으로 한」이라는 등기원인 내지 권리발생요건에도 기판력이 발생하느냐를 규명하였다. 논의과정에서 「소송물=기판력의 객관적범위」라는 등식이 성립하지 아니함에도 왜 그 등식의 성립을 주장하는지에 대한 이유를 분석한 결과 기판력의 객관적 범위를 규정하고 있는 민사소송법 제216조 1항이 갖는 그 자체의 고유한 의미보다는 기판력의 작용에 초점을 두었기 때문이라는 점을 찾아내었다. 위 등식을 사용하는 것은 위 제216조 1항의 규정취지를 몰각시키고 기판력을 소송물이론의 대결의 장으로 만들 우려가 있다고 본다. 그리하여 필자는 「가져야만미친다」는 주장을 펼치면서 위 조항에 충실한 해석을 시도하였다. 그 결과 ‘주문에 포함된 것’이라는 함은 주문에 기재된 것에 한하는 것도 아니고 주문에 기재된 모든 표시를 의미하는 것도 아닌, 그것은 매우 함의적이고 함축적인 의미를 담고 있다는 결론에도달하는 한편, ‘가진다’의 의미로 「기판력이 발생하는 객관적 범위」라는 용어를, ‘미친다’는 의미를 가진 즉 기판력의 작용 국면을 의미하는 「기판력이 미치는 객관적 범위」 라는 용어를 사용하자고 제한하였다. 그 외에도 제1판결의 내용과 그와 같은 판결이 나오게 된 배경 및 의미를 분석하는 과정에서 기판력의 본질에 관한 실체법설과 소송법설에 대하여 심도 있는 공부를 하였다. ‘매매를 원인으로 한’ 소유권이전등기절차 이행을 구하는 청구취지에 등기청구권의존부에 관한 청구 이외에도 매매계약의 적부에 대한 판단 즉 소유권의 귀속에 관한 판단 청구도 묵시적으로 포함되어 있다고 할 것인가, 따라서 그 이행을 명하는 주문에 소유권귀속에 관한 판단도 포함되어 있다고 볼 것인가에 관한 문제에 대해 논의하였다. 필자는 청구취지에는 묵시적 의사표시의 존재를 인정할 수 있더라도 주문에는 판결서의 본질적 기능, 즉 1) 당사자에 대한 보고적 의의, 2) 상급심의 심리기초를 형성, 3) 판결확정 후 판결 효력 범위의 명확화 등의 점에 비추어 묵시적 표시를 인정할 수 없다고본다. 청구취지와 주문에 등기원인과 연월일을 기재하도록 한 이유는 판결에 의한 등기의 단독신청과 그 등기실행을 위한 등기사무상의 요청에 따른 것이라고 보아야 하는 것이며, 그 등기원인 등에 기판력을 인정하자는 주장은 곧 실체법적으로 등기의 공신력을인정하지 않고 있는 현행법을 우회하여 절차적으로 등기의 공신력을 인정하는 것과 진배없다고 비판하였다. 기판력의 객관적 범위에 포함되지 않는 영역, 즉 전소와 동일 쟁점사실을 기초로 하고 있으나 소송물을 달리하여 후소가 제기된 경우 전소판결의 이유에서 한 쟁점사실에관한 판단에 ‘유력한 증거’로서의 효력을 주고 있는 판례의 태도를 살펴보았다. 이상의 논의를 통해서 「매매를 원인으로 한」이라는 주문의 기재에는 기판력이 미치지 않는다는 결론을 내렸다. 어쩌면 애당초 이 논문은 답 그 자체의 발견보다는 그 답을 찾아가는 과정을 그려나감으로써 기판력과 관련한 여러 주제를 공부하기 위함에 있었는지도 모르겠다. 그리고 민사소송법에 기판력이란 제도를 마련하여 두고 있는 정당성의 근거를 법적 안정성, 즉 사회질서의 유지 및 같은 분쟁의 반복 금지에 의한 소송경제의 요청에 두고 있음에도 불구하고 판례의 기판력의 객관적 범위에 대한 협소함과그 제...