샘플러를 통한 대기오염노출 평가와 건강영향 조사

이지나,허청송,임종한,최예용,김선태 한국환경독성학회 2004 환경독성보건학회지 Vol.19 No.2

In order to evaluate a health effect of air pollution, we designed exposure group(taxi driver, street sweeper, street trader,) and non-exposure group(office clerk). We analysed exposure and biologic marker by using personal sampler. Mean NO₂ and benzene level in each group were statistically significant. Also, respiratory symptom, chronic cough, sputum, and dyspnea on exertion were statistically significant in each group.

생물학적 검정법을 이용한 소규모 수계내 수질 오염물질의 환경독성 평가 : 상추씨 발아시험과 Microtox 시험 비교 Comparision between Lettuce Seed Germination Test and Microtox Bioassay

이지나,황인영 한국환경독성학회 1999 환경독성보건학회지 Vol.14 No.4

Environmental toxicities of priority water pollutants were evaluated by two selected bioassays, Lettuce seed germination/elongation test and Microtox acute toxicity test. Toxic chemicals (heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and phenolic compounds) inhibited the germination rate and root elongation of Lettuce seed, as well as the bioluminescence of Microtox bacteria. When test biota were exposed to target chemicals, the sensitivity of Lettuce bioassay was relatively lower than that of Microtox bioassay. However, Lettuce bioassay may be a good candidate for prescreening the environmental toxicities of priority water pollutants, since the testing method with Lettuce seed was relatively easier and more economic than with Microtox bacteria. Toxicity tests were conducted to compare the validity and sensitivity of both bioassays for sediment from a small stream passed through urban area as well as leachate from a municipal solid waste landfill. From experimental results, we found that Lettuce test and Microtox test are compensated each other as a battery of bioassay for evaluating the environmental toxicities of field samples obtained from a small stream contaminated by pollutants.

North Korea: Juche, the Constitution and the Refugee Crisis

이지나 경북대학교 법학연구원 2017 법학논고 Vol.0 No.59

Perhaps no other nation which remains under communist rule is more ironic, disturbing and intriguing as that of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (hereinafter ‘DPRK’ or ‘North Korea’). Given the complex intersection between different international legal standards, it is necessary to bring attention to the refugee crisis facing thousands of DPRK citizens who flee their homeland each year. An analysis of the legal system of a nation provides an additional outlook to the views afforded by traditional international studies scholars, who typically apply sociological, economic or political lenses to analyze relationships between agencies and actors, the allocation of resources, or power struggles within different hierarchy systems. Although these frameworks are certainly valid and applicable in coming to an understanding of the DPRK’s horrendous abuses of human rights, identifying what is novel about the North Korean legal system which is based on socialist law is essential and that will help further the comprehension of the intricate relationship between the DPRK constitution and its abuse of human rights. North Korea defines its law as ‘law of the socialist society and national sovereignty that perform a function of the proletarian dictatorship’. Accordingly, it is necessary to keep in mind such a difference in analyzing North Korean laws, for North Korea’s concept of law and its function is quite different from that of other law-governed countries, such as South Korea. Thus, this paper attempts to perform a systematic examination of the constitution of the DPRK, the underlying ideology which continues to legitimize the existence of such a state, and implications as well as solutions regarding the North Korean refugee crisis in China. In doing so, this paper will also incorporate an interdisciplinary approach by applying the lenses of constitutional law, international law, and human rights law to provide a comprehensive view of the North Korean refugee crisis.

형사사법에서의 인공지능 예측프로그램 활용 제언: 인종적 편향 가능성 회피를 중심으로

이지나 원광대학교 법학연구소 2023 圓光法學 Vol.39 No.2

In recent period, crime prediction programs have been newly introduced and utilized internationally in the field of criminal justice. COMPAS (“Corrective Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions”), as a representative example, is a recidivism prediction program used in several States in the United States. COMPAS is the most widely used risk assessment tools in the United States. The U.S. company Northpointe has developed an artificial intelligence algorithm that predicts the possibility of recidivism by analyzing the accumulated data such as criminal records, family relationships, educational history, drug abuse, etc. However, as it has been controversially argued that the results of these algorithms violate the defendants' constitutional rights, fundamental questions arise on how the results of the algorithm are produced, and what factors are calculated in judging a specific decision. In the era of A.I., ‘artificial intelligence’ is a concept that encompasses both technology development, utilization, and operation systems, normative judgment and policy design related to the use of the system in the judicial system. Furthermore, ethical guidelines for preventing individual risks in the use of artificial intelligence and other legal restraints, including criminal sanctions, should be established. Based on the crime prediction, this study will discuss the bias and racism of algorithms based on crime prediction technologies. This paper further aims to scrutinize the crime prediction and artificial intelligence algorithms in relation to the racial discrimination and social inequality against specific groups in criminal justice. Though not as much as in the U.S., often referred to as a ‘salad bowl’ society, South Korea has also entered a multicultural society due to recent surge in immigration, labor market, and international marriage. Lastly, the author emphasizes the importance of further research on the utilization of crime prediction tool in South Korea, as it requires careful deliberation and thorough comparative legal research prior the adoption of the new technology in the criminal justice system.

전시주최자의 서비스 실패 및 회복에 관한 연구 : 카자흐스탄의 전시서비스를 중심으로

이지나,이혜련 한국무역전시학회 2011 무역전시연구 Vol.6 No.2

성인 구순구개열 환자에서 Multidisciplinary 치료로 기능성 교합을 형성한 증례

이지나 대한구순구개열학회 2012 대한구순구개열학회지 Vol.15 No.1

A 20 year-old cleft lip and palate patient came for occlusal rehabilitation, but the constricted maxilla and early loss of posterior teeth called for an unusual treatment modalities. Distraction osteogenesis in the edentulous areas followed by artificial bone graft, dental implant along with orthodontic tooth movement were planed. Multidisciplinary treatment enabled both esthetic and functional oral rehabilitation of this patient.

사회복지 담론으로서의 기본소득 고찰

이지나,황명진 한국공공사회학회 2022 공공사회연구 Vol.12 No.2

This study explores the contemporary discourse about Universal Basci Income(UBI) with a focus on the concept of citizenship. It includes UBI as a social discourse in not only social rights for the welfare state but also civil rights and political rights for capitalism and democratic advance in a complex way. Accordingly, this study examined the relationship between the subcategories of citizenship and UBI. The effectiveness of UBI was suggested as follows. First, the UBI will contribute to the restoration of the ‘community function’. Second, UBI will contribute to the achievement of ‘Complex Equality’. Third, UBI will restore the value of 'human dignity'. Fourth, the basic income will guarantee the 'citizen's right to health'. Fifth, the basic income will restore the value of 'work and vocation'. Lastly, UBI has limitations such as financial burden, concerns about reduced work motivation and labor force, and conflict with the existing welfare system, so continuous discussion is necessary. 본 연구는 ‘시민권(citizenship)’의 개념을 중심으로 기본소득이 가지고 있는 의미를 고찰하였다. 기본소득은 복지국가를 위한 사회권(social rights)뿐 아니라, 자본주의와 민주주의를 위한 공민권(civil rights)과 정치권(political rights)이 복합적으로 작용하는 거대담론이다. 이에 본 연구는 우선 기본소득, 시민권의 하위범주와 기본소득의 연관성을 고찰하였으며, 기본소득의 효과성에 대해 다음과 같이 제언하였다. 첫째, 기본소득은 ‘공동체 기능’의 회복에 기여할 것이다. 둘째, 기본소득은 ‘복합평등(Complex Equality)’ 달성에 기여할 것이다. 셋째, 기본소득은 ‘인간 존엄’의 가치를 회복할 것이다. 넷째, 기본소득은 ‘시민의 건강권’을 보장할 것이다. 다섯째, 기본소득은 ‘일(work)과 소명(vocation)’의 가치를 회복할 것이다. 마지막으로 기본소득은 재정부담, 근로의욕 및 노동력 감소에 대한 우려, 기존의 복지제도와의 상충 등의 한계점을 지니고 있어 지속적인 논의 에 대한 제언을 제시하였다.

등산복 구매행동의 특성 연구

이지나,박옥련,이동철 한국자료분석학회 2006 Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society Vol.8 No.3

The purpose of this research is to identify differences between characteristics of purchase behavior of outdoor wear consumers, demographic variables and mountain climbing related variables. The subjects of surveys are selected among men and women consumers having experiences of purchasing outdoor wear in ages from 20's to over 50's who live in the vicinity of Busan. Data and information collected are analyzed by using SPSS Program. Results from the analysis of purchasing purpose indicates that they buy outdoor wear conducive to two similar reasons; that is, "only to exercise and enjoy mountain climbing" and "either to wear it in time of climbing mountain or everyday life," and results from the analysis of purchase frequency reveals that '1~2 times' a year is the highest. Results from analysis of preference of brand of outdoor wear reveals that Kolon Sport is followed by the North Face and K2. 소득 수준과 삶의 질 향상을 위한 사회의식의 강화는 보다 쾌적한 라이프스타일의 추구와 여가문화에 대한 인식의 변화 및 웰빙 문화확산에 따른 레저 인구의 증가로 나타나고 있다. 특히 등산에만 국한되던 아웃도어 이미지가 점차 다양한 레저활동으로 확대되고 등산복과 캐주얼웨어의 경계가 모호해지면서 아웃도어 브랜드 업체들도 캐주얼 의류보다 화사하고 편안한 등산복을 출시하고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 등산복 소비자의 일반적인 구매행동 특성 및 인구통계적 특성과 브랜드 선호도에 관하여 살펴보고자 한다.본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 등산복의 구매 목적은 '등산만을 위해서'와 '등산복과 일상복으로' 구매하는 경우도 비슷하게 나타나 등산복을 일상적인 캐주얼웨어로도 겸하여 입는 소비자가 많다. 그리고 여자는 '등산만을 위해서'가, 남자는 '등산과 일상복으로'가 가장 높게 나타났고, 여성 소비자들에 비해 남성 소비자들이 등산복 한 벌 당 가격대가 더 높은 것을 알 수 있었다. 또 모든 연령대에서 구매 정보원으로서 '친구 & 소속집단'이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 등산복 브랜드의 선호도와 보유현황은 전체 선호도는 코오롱 스포츠가 1위, 노스페이스가 2위, 케이투가 3위로 나타났다. 주요용어 : 등산복, 구매 정보원, 캐주얼웨어, 라이프스타일, 아웃도어 브랜드.

중국 소셜커머스 정보품질에 대한 이용자 만족에 관한 연구

이지나 한국디지털정책학회 2015 디지털융복합연구 Vol.13 No.9

Battered Women in Criminal Court and Admission of Expert Testimony on the Battered Woman Syndrome

이지나 전북대학교 부설법학연구소 2022 法學硏究 Vol.68 No.-

Domestic violence and women suffering from the pattern of violence in abusive relationships are prevalent in our society, and many cases that involve battered women who kill their abusive partners raise a significant challenge to the current law of self-defense. In South Korea, according to one empirical study, the majority number of incarcerated women are convicted of murdering their partners, and the study further reveals that those women suffered from a long-term learned helplessness as Walker's theory in Cycle of Violence. See generally, Other similar studies have been conducted in South Korea and they also show that many battered women suffered from severe violence in their abusive relationships which eventually led them into a helpless situation, both physically and mentally. See generally, While a number of precedent studies on Battered Woman Syndrome (hereinafter “BWS”) in the court has focused on the issue of self-defense rules, the article attempts to examine the U.S. cases of BWS in which various social science expert witnesses had testified in the court to enhance the juror’s understandings. To assist jurors in their holistic comprehension of the experiences of battered women, various experts in the field of domestic violence and BWS should be admitted into the court to testify. Upon hearing the expert testimony on the social constraints that many battered women encounter, the jury finds it easier to account for the context within which the battered women live, and, therefore, may better appreciate the reasonableness of a battered woman’s actions. See generally, Cheryl A. Terrance & Karyn M. Plumm, Battered Women Who Kill: The Impact of Expert Testimony and Empathy Induction in the Courtroom 15 Violence Against Women 186 (2009) In South Korea, the court decides whether the experts testify in the court or review the evidence presented, and generally, the decisions on the probative value of the expert evidence rest with the judge. While there exist differences in the legal system of expert testimony between the U.S. and South Korea, the author still attempts to emphasize the necessity of further empirical social psychological research in the legal field and the significance of non-traditional expert witnesses who may provide an alternative framework in the cases of BWS.