http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이상태 (검색결과 787 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
이상태 국어교육학회(since1969) 2006 국어교육연구 Vol.0 No.39
The spirit of this thesis is simple to the European teachers, but may be bitter to teachers of Korean.We found some negative results from the students who have been taught Korean after twelve years of teaching. Much of them cannot catch the accurate conceptual structures after reading a book of some conceptual complexities, nor can compose meaningful essays, and pass unnoticed the logical fallacies in discourses.We think these results are due to the philosophy constituting the curricula of Korean. The curricula of the subject are consisted of arts of verbal activities, such as speaking, listening, hearing and reading. So they specify manuals of greetings, arts of listening, processes of reading, and so forth. The compilers of curricula were influenced by the curricular of teaching a language as a foreign one.They lack thinking processes, logic and reasoning which are underlain in oral texts and written ones. Native tongue is a forceful tool of thinking and reasoning. It is an instrument of recognizing the world and self. It also is a tool of explicating the phenomena of the world, and of analyzing abstract propositions. In teaching a native tongue, we must impose thinking and reasoning on every student specifically in one's higher level.이상태 소속: 경북대학교 사범대학 국어교육과 주소: [702-701] 대구시 북구 산격동 1370전화: 053-950-5824 전자우편: stalee@mail.knu.ac.kr
-
-
-
-
過渡期文學の一形態 : 西行と長明を中心として 西行(사이교-)와 長期(쬬-메이)를 中心으로 하여
李相泰 慶北大學校 人文大學 1987 인문학총 Vol.12 No.-
日本 平安時代의 代表的인 文學, 和歌는 「마음을 씨앗」으로 해서, 여러 가지 心情을 外的死物과 自然의 風物로 부쳐 表出한 것이다. 즉, 마음이 주인이고 중심이었다. 그러나, 平安末期의 王朝體制의 崩壞와 더불어 사회적 불안과 절망 속에서 사람들의 마음은 혼돈을 겪지 않을 수 없었다. 특히, 平安末期부터 中世初期에 걸친 過渡期에 태어난 西行(사이교)와 鴨長明(가모노쬬메이)는 이미 사라진 舊時代와 아직 도래하지 않은 新時代의 틈바구니에서 진지하게 삶의 길을 추구하려 하였다. 그러나 그들은 苦惱와 惡으로 가득한 俗世를 버리고 佛道修行을 하면서도, 한편으로는 그들의 고향인 都邑(京都)과 傳統的 王朝文化를 잊을 수가 없었다. 그들의 內面世界는 깨달음과 淨土往生을 위한 道心과 藝道에 대한 愛着心으로 분열된 二元的인 世界였다. 그들은 佛道藝道一如의 境地를 希求하였으나 과도기적인 그들의 마음은 끝내 自己自身을 하나로 할 수 없이, 道心과 詩心의 對立, 分裂 속에서 生을 마쳤다. 그러나, 自身의 內面을 깊이 응시하며 끝까지 求道의 精神으로 진지하게 生의 길을 추구한 그들의 문학은 過渡期 時代의 하나의 典型으로 길이 남을 것이다.
-
-
-
李相泰 淑明女子大學校 1983 論文集 Vol.24 No.-
Corresponding to two systems of justice, 'Common Law' and 'Equity', interests in land are classed as legal estates or equitable interests. The feudal structure was imposed after the Norman:Conquest 1066. The theory of the common law is that all land is held of the King who is the supreme feudal lord. Tenants may hold directly or indirectly from the King. The tenants owed their lord the performance of services for the grant of land. Feudal services became to a certain extant standardised. Each of these sets of services was known as a tenure. Land held in tenure was also held for an estate for some period of time. On the other hand, equitable interests in land have their origin in the use, later the trust. The Law of Property Act 1925 permitts two estates only to exist as legel estates, one 'fee simple absolute in possession' and one 'term of years absolute', converting the other estates into equitable interests. The legal estate, 'fee simple absolute in possession' is the largest, most complete bundle of rights Englishman can hold in land. That can be held by a person and his heirs forever, or until his government can no longer protect. Those who hold that legal estate can occupy and use, build, mine, drill, farm, creat other lesser estate, rent or lease, sell, devise by will, abandon the land. And that can exist without actual possession of land. To these extents the concept of 'fee simple absolute in possession' is much similar to that of the right or ownership of land in the Continental Law. But when land is trespassed or infringed, the actions (the action of trespass and the action of ejectment are allowed) are closely related to possession of land. English Law has not known the legal protecting means of land ownership on the basis of abstract title itself. This is the difference between English Law and Continental Law. The reason of that difference can be found in the historical evolution of 'seisin' in England. In the past, seisin was so cardinal and important that one may almost say that the whole system of English Land Law was law about it and its consequences. In the medieval times seisin suggested the very opposite-pease and quiet. A man who was put in seisin of land was 'set' there and continued 'sit' there. Seisin contatined not only title but also actual possession of objects. Every proprietary right must have a seisin at its root. Without livery of seisin conveyance of proprietary right was impossible and inconceivable. After the medieval times, seisin gradually came to be converted into abstract notion. Conveyance of proprietary right was getting to be possible without delivery of actual occupation. Finally the word, 'possession' which meant only actual occupation of objects came to appear. When in seventeenth century the action of ejectment had been perfected as a general action for the recovery of land, it shifted the basis of title from the feudal concept seisin to the simple fact of possession. Consequently the basic difference between English Land Lsw and Continental Land Law comes from the following fact. While continental countries had sweeped away their feudal land law and legislated modern land law by adopting the Roman Law, England has been transfiguring the feudal land law gradually to modern land law within the principle of 'stare decisis'.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
