문서제출 명령의 요건으로서 관련성과 문서제출 거부사유로서 기술,직업 비밀 -대법원 2008. 4. 14. 자 2007마725 결정의 판시내용을 중심으로

이무상 ( Moo Sang Lee ) 단국대학교법학연구소 2009 법학논총 Vol.33 No.1

Recently The Korean Supreme Court(KSC) has delivered a judgement reversing High Court`s conclusion, holding that if there is not any grounds to reject Order to Produce Documents provided at Article 344 ② of Civil Procedure Code(CPC), the holders of the documents have general duties to produce them to the court, which are relevant to with the fact to be proved, in reliance of Order of Produce Documents. High Court had reversed 1st Court`s decision to order to produce documents to defendant, on the ground that the ordered documents was not relevant to the fact to be proved, but only to be reversed by KSC. The issue here was what relevancy means, and in this specific case whether there was relevancy between the documents which the plaintiff had requested and the fact to be proved. In this case the plaintiff`s cause of action was fraud, including false representation of a past fact of defendant letting plaintiff to send money to company he had made for the purpose of forfeiture. Plaintiff requested Order to Produce Documents such as a cash book and a balance sheet of the company, of which defendant was a director. The request was admitted by 1st Court as relevant to the fact which was to be proved, but reversed in High Court. High Court made a mistake by misunderstanding the concept of relevancy, ruling that there was not direct relevancy between the requested documents such as a cash book of the company and the fact of false representation of defendant which was to be proved. The KSC corrected the mistake High Court had made, holding that the documents of the company which the plaintiff requested in this case was relevant to the fact to be proved. I thoroughly agree with the KSC`s conclusion, but it deserves criticism that the KSC has failed to articulate the rule which is related in this case. Generally CPC is not accustomed with the concept of `admissibility` which is important in the U.S. law of evidence. In the U.S. law of evidence, it is clear that evidence is relevant only if it supports a factual proposition that is of consequence to the outcome at trial. The evidence is not only relevant when it directly relates to consequential facts, but also relevant if it has probative value-that is the presence of a logical relationship between the evidence and the ultimate proposition that the evidence is offered to support. In this case the KSC was right in conclusion, but failed to articulate the evidence rule of relevancy. The KSC should have make it clear that the evidence is not only relevant when it directly relates to consequential facts, but also relevant if it has probative value, even if not directly relates to consequential facts. Some holders of documents have right to reject Order to Produce the Documents on the ground that there are informations relates to secretes in technology and profession of the holder by CPC Article 344 ②. In this case the KSC delivered that company documents such as cash book and a balance sheet ect. are not such documents as prescribed in Article 344 ② of CPC.

연구논문 : 프랑스 민사소송법전(CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVIL) - 제1권 번역(1) -

이무상 ( Moo Sang Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2016 법학논총 Vol.40 No.1

프랑스 민사소송법전은 6권으로 구성되어 있다. 제1권은 모든 법원에 공통된 규정, 제2권은 각종법원에 특수한 규정, 제3권은 특정사건에 대한 특별규정, 제4권은 중재, 제5권은 분쟁의 우호적 해결, 제6권은 해외영토 관련조항이다. 제1권은 총 22편으로 구성되어 있다. 제1편 머리규정, 제2편 소권, 제3편 관할, 제4편 재판상 청구, 제5편 방어방법, 제5-1편 주된 위헌성 문제, 제5-2편행정법원의 선결문제에 관한 소송, 제6편 화해와 조정, 제7편 증거의 재판상제출, 8편 복수의 당사자, 제9편 소송참가, 제9-1편 아동에 대한 재판상 심문, 제10편 회피, 기피, 이송 및 당사자 기속, 제11편 부대적 소송절차, 제12편 소송상 대리 및 보조, 제13편 검사, 제14편 판결, 제15편 판결의 집행, 제16편 불복절차, 제17편 기간, 집행관증서 및 송달, 제18편 비용과 소송비용, 제19편 법원사무과, 제20편 재판사무촉탁, 제21편 전자방식에 의한 전달, 제22편 최종규정이 그 내용이다. 본고는 제1권 제1편부터 제6편을 대상으로 한다. The CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE is composed of 6 books. The first book is provisions common to all courts, the second is provisions particular to each court, the third is provisions particular to certain subject-matters, the fourth is l’arbitration, the fifth is the resolution amicable of conflicts, the sixth is provisions related to the over-sea. The first book is composed of 22 titles. The first title is preliminary provisions, the 2nd is right of action, the 3rd jurisdiction, the 4th action in law, the 5th ground of defence, the 5-1th question of constitutionality, the5-2th the procedure over question of preliminary of the administrative courts, the 6th conciliation and mediation, the7th production of proof, the 8th multiple parties, the 9th intervention, the 9-1th hearing of child in court, the 10th disclaimer, refusal, referral and prise of parties, the 11th interlocutory proceedings, the 12th legal representation and assistance in court, the 13th the public prosecutor, the 14th le judgement, the 15th execution of judgement, the 16th means of review, the 17th time-limits, processes through a bailiff and services, the 18th fees and costs, the 19th clerk’s office of the court, the 20th letters rogatory, the 21th la communication by electronic method, the 22th final proposition. The first book of title the 1st to 6th is the object of this translation.

연구논문(硏究論文) : 부동산 가압류의 처분제한적 효력

이무상 ( Moo Sang Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2007 법학논총 Vol.31 No.2

문제중심학습의 학습촉진 요인에 관한 연구

이무상(Moo Sang Lee),이종태(ong Tae Lee),이수곤(Soo Kon Lee),양은배(Eun Bae Yang) 한국의학교육학회 1997 Korean journal of medical education Vol.9 No.2

The University of Yonsei College of Medicine is implementing a new undergraduate curriculum that emphasizes active, self-directed learning. The aims of this study were to investigate the factors affecting problem-based le arning(PBL). We surveyed 169 senior students of medical college in Yonsei University. Among them, 137(82.0%) students answered. We developed a question form on seven areas, centering the factors affecting problem-based learning: small-grouping learning, teachers, teaching-learning environments, learning methods, working problem, assessment, the awareness on the problem-based learning method. Those questions were developed as five point scale and were conducted on April 26, 1997. The results of this study are like this: First, the factors affecting problem-based learning appear as working problem, teaching-learning environments, teaching-learning materials. Second, no difference based on working problem form was found. However, the group which used Harvard Working Problem proved to be think more positively than the group which used Illinois Working Problem. As the most important factors affecting problem-based learning appeared as working problem, teaching-learning environments and learning materials, so we should develop the environments and materials promoting self-regulated learning. Finally, the continuous and systematic study on problem-based learning is needed.

판례평석(判例評釋) : 디자인등록무효심결 취소소송에서 사실상의 진술과 법률상의 진술 - 대법원 2011. 3. 24. 선고, 2010후3509 판결에 대한 평석 -

이무상 ( Moo Sang Lee ) 법조협회 2015 法曹 Vol.64 No.6

대상판결에서 대법원은 “법원이 당사자가 주장하지도 아니한 법률요건에 대하여 판단하는 것은 변론주의 원칙에 위배되는 것이다.”라고 판시하였다. 이러한 대법원의 판시는 소송에서 사실에 대한 주장책임을 당사자에게 맡기고 법원은 당사자가 주장한 사실을 기초로 법을 적용하여 판결을 하여야 한다는 변론주의에 대한 통설이나 종전의 판례의 설시와 달라 문제가 된다. 우리 법원실무는 법적 삼단논법에 따른 방법론에 기초하여 구체적 사안에 대하여 법을 해석·적용하고 있음에도 그러한 방법론에 불철저하여 법률의 문제와 사실의 문제를 혼동하거나 얼버무리는 경우가 많다. 대상판결도 이러한 실무의 관행이 그대로 반영된 것으로 당사자의 사실상의 진술과 법률상의 진술을 개념적으로 명확하게 구분하지 아니한 상태에서 변론주의의 소송원칙을 적용하기 때문에 혼선을 빚는 것으로 보인다. 대상판결이 법적 삼단논법에 기초한 방법론을 지양하고 최근에 논의되는 새로운 방법론을 판결에 반영하여 변론주의라는 소송법상 원칙에 대하여 새로운 해석을 시도하는 것으로 보이지는 않는다. 법적 삼단논법을 대체할 새로운 방법론에 터 잡은 민사소송법이 구축될 때까지는 법적 삼단논법의 방법론에 따른 법적용에 철저해야 한다. 그러기 위해서는 법적 삼단논법에 따른 법적용 방법론을 보다 명확히 이해할 필요가 있으며 요건사실과 요건대응사실(주요사실)에 대한 명확한 인식이 필요하다. 나아가 새로운 방법론에 대한 학계와 법조계의 많은 연구와 고민이 필요하다. The Korean Supreme Court(KSC), on 24th March 2011, ruled that "it would be contrary to ‘the principle of party’s duty to submit facts’ for the Court to judge based on the legal elements which is not asserted by parties." Such a ruling is problematic because it contradicts to the common view and KSC``s precedents which explain the ‘principle of party’s duty to submit facts’ as a principle which is related only to facts, not legal elements. The ``method of legal syllogism`` which strictly requires the differentiation of legal assertions and factual assertions. However, the court often confuses legal issues with factual issues, although it uses the method in practice. The KSC judgment reviewed in this paper is also confused in applying ‘the principle of party’s duty to submit facts’ because it does not strictly distinguish legal assertions from factual assertions, which is commonly done in the bench and bar today. The judgement does not seem to be refraining from a legal-syllogism-based methodology and trying a new method based on a new interpretation of ‘the principle of party’s duty to submit facts’ discussed in recent years. Until the new method to replace the current legal-syllogism-based method is introduced in the Civil Procedure, however, it is necessary to understand the methodology of legal syllogism more throughly and make clear the difference between the concept of elemental facts and facts matching with legal elements (the so called consequential facts). Furthermore, more research will be required from both the academia and the legal professions for the new methodology to be fully developed.

연구논문(硏究論文) : 혼동으로 소멸하는 질권의 효력 및 세르비아나 소권과 기판사항의 항변 -D.44.2.30.1 Paulus 14 Quaestionum의 釋義-

이무상 ( Moo Sang Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2011 법학논총 Vol.35 No.2

The text of an exegesis of Digest 44.2.30.1. has issues of substantial laws and procedural laws at the same time. What happens in Roman law when a creditor pigneraticius acquires owenership of the thing pledged to him without receiving payment from debtor? Whether or not the right of pledge is extinguished as a consequence of the fact that the creditor obtained ownership is a difficult question. In this exegesis Paul concluded that the pledge can not continue when creditor was made owner, but as there had not been satisfaction, a creditor can persuit the thing. Paul refused to accept the unjust consequence of applying the merger-principle mechanically. The position of Paul is adapted not only in BGB, but also in Korean Civil Code. If the suit concerned the ownership of the piece of land and if the judgement had been pronounced in favour of the plaintiff, the man who was defeated in the first lawsuit would be opposed by exceptio rei iudicatae. But if the possessor, who had lost the possession, claimed the piece of land from the same person who did not win in the first suit, the exceptio would not be applicable against him. In contrast to a suit on ownership, in a suit between two mortgage creditors the representations of the parties don`t exclude each other and judgement that the plaintiff is a pledge creditor does not exclude the possibility that the defendant also mortgage creditor. Even though a pignus creditor who had acquired owenership was defeated in the first Actio Serviana law suit, he may institute Actio Serviana without having to fear of exceptio rei judicatae raised from oppernent who has inferior pledge of pignus. At the end of the text Paul went back to the point of the procedural approach of the exceptio rei iudicatae and in a typically pragmatical way he came to a just result.

태백 고생대 박물관 계획

이무상(Lee, Moo-Sang) 한국실내디자인학회 2007 한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.9 No.1

보령화력발전소 홍보관 계획

이무상(Lee, Moo-Sang),정도균(Jung, Do-Kuen) 한국실내디자인학회 2007 한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.9 No.1

구급대원을 대상으로 한 환자평가 교육 전·후 수행도의 비교

이무상(Moo-Sang Lee),이슬기(Seul-Ki Lee),김기운(Gi-Woon Kim) 한국산학기술학회 2016 한국산학기술학회논문지 Vol.17 No.7

본 연구는 119구급대원을 대상으로 환자평가 수행도에 대한 교육 전·후를 비교함으로써, 구급대원을 대상으로 한 적절한 교육방법 및 기초자료를 제시하기 위해 진행하였다. 전국 4개 시·도 119구급대원 26명을 대상으로 하였으며, 연구는 2015년 12월 14일부터 17일까지 시행하였다. 구급대원이 직접 모의환자를 대상으로 환자평가 및 보고를 시행하도록 하였고, 환자평가를 진행하는 동안 각각의 증상(두통, 가슴통증, 호흡곤란)에 대한 체크리스트(checklist)를 사용하여 교육 전·후를 평 가하였다. 연구 결과는 중앙값(사분위값)으로 기술 분석하였고, 교육 전 환자평가 수행도는 100점 만점에 66점(54.00-80.25) 이었으나 교육 후 88.5점(80.00-93.00)으로 유의한 상승을 보였다(p<0.001). 환자평가 수행도 중 가슴통증 증례 5개의 항목, 두통 증례 7개의 항목, 호흡곤란의 증례 9개의 항목에서 교육 후에 유의한 증가를 보였고, 환자와의 관계형성에서는 구급대 원을 다시 만나고 싶은 정도의 평가점수가 유의한 상승을 보였다(p<0.01). 또한 환자상태 보고 적절성의 모든 평가항목은 교육 후 수행도가 유의하게 상승하였다(p<0.01). 본 연구의 결과는 시뮬레이션 실습에 의한 교육이 119구급대원들의 환자 평가 수행도 개선에 필요하다는 것을 보여준다. 따라서 119구급대원에 대한 실질적이고 체계적인 환자평가 교육은 필요하며, 지속적이고 많은 교육의 기회가 주어져야 할 것이다. The current study was conducted to make pre-post comparisons of education done for 119 emergency medical technicians (EMT) on the patient assessment performance. The data are expected to offer applicable training methods and educational resources for emergency medical services. Twenty six EMT from four cities and provinces participated in the study, which was carried out from 14 to 17 December, 2015. The technicians performed a patient assessment and marked reports on simulated patients. In the course of the assessment, a pre-post evaluation of education was done using a checklist regarding the respective symptoms, such as headache, chest pain, and dyspnea. The median value (quartile value) was used as the descriptive analysis. While patient assessment scores marked 66 points (54.00-80.25) out of 100 (p<0.01) before education, there was a significant increase in the after-education scores, which reached 88.5 points (80.00-93.00). The patient assessment performances revealed a significant increase (p<.0.01) in 5 chest pain, 7 headache, and 9 dyspnea items after education. Similarly, there was an increase in wanting to meet the EMT again scale in regards to categories involved in developing positive relations with patients. Moreover, the adequacy in the patient condition reports all marked a significant increase (p<0.01) in assessment categories. The present study shows that education based on simulation practices are necessary for improvements in patient assessment performance of 119 EMT. Therefore, practical and systematic patient assessment educations may serve as a prerequisite. Further opportunities should be provided for the EMT consistently.

프랑스 민사소송법전 -제1권 번역(2)-

이무상 ( Moo-sang Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2016 법학논총 Vol.40 No.2

프랑스 민사소송법전은 6권으로 구성되어 있다. 제1권은 모든 법원에 공통된 규정, 제2권은 각종법원에 특수한 규정, 제3권은 특정사건에 대한 특별규정, 제4권은 중재, 제5권은 분쟁의 우호적 해결, 제6권은 해외영토 관련조항이다. 제1권은 총 22편으로 구성되어 있다. 본고는 제1권 제7편 중 제1,2소편을 대상으로 한다. 제7편은 우리 민사소송법 제2편 제3장 증거에 비교될 수 있다. 제1소편은 증거서류에 관하여 규정하며, 구체적으로 당사자 사이의 증거서류의 전달, 제3자가 소지한 증거서류의 취득, 당사자가 소지한 증거서류의 제출 등에 대하여 규정한다. 제2소편은 각종의 증거조사에 대하여 규정하며, 구체적으로 판사본인의 검증, 당사자본인출석, 제3자의 진술, 전문가에 의해 실시되는 증거조사 등에 대하여 규정하고있다. 제3자나 당사자에 대한 문서제출명령을 함에 있어 아스트렝트를 부과하여 이를 강제할 수 있다는 점과, 제3자의 진술에 있어 증인신문방식 이외에 진술서를 통한 진술방식이 자세히 규정된 점, 전문가에 의해 실시되는 증거방법에 있어서 감정 이외에 확인 진단 등 다양한 방식이 규정된 점이 우리 민사소송법과 다른 특색이다. The CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE is composed of 6 books. The first book is provisions common to all courts, the second is provisions particular to each court, the third is provisions particular to certain subject-matters, the fourth is l’arbitration, the fifth is the resolution amicable of conflicts, the sixth is provisions related to the over-sea. The first book is composed of 22 titles. Here we discuss sub-title 1 and 2 of the title 7 of the first book. The title 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the evidence rule which maches with chapter 3 title 2 of Korean Code of Civil Procedure. The first sub-title deals with documents, especially communication of the documents between parties and getting documents held by a third party, production of documents held by a party. The second sub-title prescribe preparatory inquiries. especially decisions on preparatory inquiries, personal appearance of the parties, statements of third parties, affidavits, investigation of witteness, preparatory inquiries implemented by an expert. The ordonance to deliver or to produce documents can be executed by astreinte, and the rules about affidavits of the third parties are concrete, and various method of preparatory inquiries implemented by an expert is prescribed in the Code of Civil Procedure.