http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이득재 (lee deuk jae) (검색결과 22 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
이득재(Lee, Deuk Jae) 중앙대학교 영미언어와문화연구소 2010 영미언어와문화 Vol.1 No.1
A great scandal occurred in korean society a few years ago centering on an embryonic stem cell. After that, there were various attempts to establish an embryonic stem cell like iPS. But these attempts resulted in negative case because an embryonis stem cell turned into cancer mass etc. We have a question. Is it possible to establish an embryonic stem cell. Scientists seems to believe in that. But it is necessary to reconsider their arguments by a philosophical thinking. Could the force of science overweight the force of life? We started from the hypostasis that any cell is idea dx as G. Deleuze says. Any elements are arranged by intensities in cell or fertilized egg. Science tries to arrange a specific element forcibly in cell, but fails to control the movement of intensities. This treatise aims to explain what happens when science meets philosophy from a point of view of consilence.
-
이득재(Lee, Deuk Jae) 대구대학교 인문과학연구소 2013 人文科學硏究 Vol.41 No.-
The cognitive science aims to study the mind of man by the results of development of science. It goes back to the early times of 20th century when the various kinds of science such as AI, Turing machine etc developed. Now it includes cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, neuroscience, cognitive philosophy, phenomenology, etc. This treatise aims to introduce the history of cognitive science, including the system theory, complexity theory, autopoiesis etc. And then, it aims to explain what the mind is and what the relation of mind, body and brain is? What is the ego in terms of cognitive science, not psychoanalysis? This is a short story about the history and development of cognitive science.
-
이득재 ( Deuk-jae Lee ) 한국문학이론과 비평학회 2001 한국문학이론과 비평 Vol.12 No.-
M. bakhtin has influenced korean literary discourses with his key con ceptions, “dialog”’ “carnival”, “chronotope”. As noted, his dialog may well be defined as dialogism to overcome monotogism which has been expressed in several ways. Especially, I am interested in his dialog becaused it is related to modernity. In this point of view, his dialog is a problem to place dialogism and monologismt and then to displace monologism to dialogism. M. Bakhtin saw modernity as a struggle betwween laughter and fear. If we could apply this to modem korean literature, it can be said that korean literature has developed from fear to laughter on the ground that korean literature started on the dual faces of modernity such as fear and laughter and oppressed the laughter aspect. In this respect, I would trace the oppressed aspect of korean literature until contemporary korean literature on the ground that korean Literature expressed that respect until nowdays. If doing so, I could conclude that our korean literature has overcome until now monologism as one aspect of modernity expressed in fear and that is the duty which Korean literature must burden on its shoulder to enlarge democratic perspective.
-
이득재(Lee Deuk Jae) 서강대학교 인문과학연구소 2014 서강인문논총 Vol.0 No.40
인지과학은 19세기 윌리엄 제임스의 심리학, 이것과 연관된 훗설의 현상학 및 메를로 퐁티의 신체의 철학, 19세기 말부터 20세기 초에 진행된 수학과 과학이론 및 기술의 발전, 튜링 머신, 사이버네틱스, 인공지능 등의 발전에 힘입어 1950년대에 등장하기 시작했다. 인지과학의 등장과 더불어 인지심리학, 인지언어학 같은 새로운 학문 분야가 생기기 시작했고 1970년대 들어서서 인지과학은 마투라나와 바렐라의 오토포이에시스 이론으로 새로운 전기를 마련하였으며 인지수사학 등의 학문 분야가 생기기 시작하였다. 그 후 뇌 과학 등의 발전으로 인지과학의 과학적 토대가 확장되면서 인지과학이 인지신학, 신경미학, 인지법학, 인지음악학 등 새로운 많은 학문 영역을 개척하고 있다. 본고는 이러한 인지과학의 발전에 따라 생겨난 인지문학론을 통해 인지문학론이 기존의 문학에 대한 전통적인 연구방법과 어떤 관계를 갖는지 살펴보고 특히 러시아 형식주의의 트레이드 마크라 할 수 있는 낯설게 하기 기법이 인지론적으로 어떻게 해석될 수 있는지 구체적인 작품을 통해 연구하고자 하는 것이 목적이다. Cognitive science began to appear in the 1950’s thanks to the William James’ psychology in the 19th century, phenomenology of Husserl and Merleau Ponty’s corporeal phenomenology, mathematical, scientific and technological development from the end of the 19th century to the early days of 20th century, Turing Machine, cybernetics, AI etc. The new humanistic disciplines such as cognitive psychology, cognitive linguistics with the appearance of cognitive science and autopoietic theory of Maturana and Varela gave an new impetus to cognitive science in the 1970’s. In this time cognitive rehtoric began to appear. The many new humanistic disciplines such as cognitive theology, neuroaesthetics, cognitive law, cognitive musicalogy began to appear as the scientific base in cognitive science is enlarged by the neuro science. This treatise aims to investigate how cognitive literary theory is related to the established literary theory appeared by the development of cognitive science and how the concept as defamiliarization which is a key word in russian formalism is interpreted cognitively through a reading of concrete literary text.
-
-
-
-
-
이득재(Lee, Deuk Jae) 대구대학교 인문과학연구소 2011 人文科學硏究 Vol.37 No.-
I try to examine the analogy between ‘frame’ theory of G. Laykof and language theory of M. M. Bakhtin. Laykof as a cognitive scientist submitted a theory that the ideology of the right and left politics is determined by their each frame expressed through language. The theory of M. M. Bakhtin is called as multiaccentuality. According to his theory, the ruling class tries to minimize multiaccentuality to uniaccentuality. There is a war on frame or class struggle in this minimization process. A war on frame can be identified with arena of class struggle told by M. M. Bakhtin. Language is an arena where social interests clash each other as frame is an arena where the progressive or conservative seizes power. In this sense, it can be said that M. M. Bakhtin anticipated Laykof. The result of class struggle depends on language where ideology is reflected and frame is determined.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
