http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 이경식 ( Lee Gyeong Sig ) (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
전투력 요소로 본 이순신의 전투준비태세와 초기전투 승리요인
이경식(Lee, Gyeong-sig) 국방부 군사편찬연구소 2016 군사 Vol.- No.98
This study focuses on how General Lee achieved continuous victories in the beginning of Japanese invasion. Unlike previous studies that focused on the victory factors on the water, this study focuses on analyses of General Lee’s combat preparation and emphasized combat capability during initial stages of battles, which defeated Japanese forces. The background of General Lee’s substantial war preparation came from the battle of Japanese invasion led by Hong-Yang in the Year of Jeong-Hae (1587). By developing the foundation for discipline and commanding system based on the past experience, Lee focused on creative, yet stuck to the basic war-preparation. One of Lee’s creative works was that he collected information of Japanese combat style to create his battle strategies: to deny enemy"s climbing up the warship, but to be close enough to target enemy ships with turtle ships, and to inspect the war preparations. For the war preparations, Lee inspected ships, various weapons, and defense system on the field. But most importantly, Lee’s victorious background originated from his nationally scaled propulsion for increasing the number of war-ships, development of cannons specially designed for battles against Japanese forces. When the actual Lim-Gin Japanese invasion occurred, Lee was fully prepared to go to the war against Japan by utilizing the effective reporting system, which reached to Right naval HQ located in Jeon-Ra provinces, observatory posts, and central government in a very short time. Lee also prepared for all possible routes of Japanese incomings and settled his navy on sea of Gyeong-Sang waiting for the imminent battle command from the government. In order to execute Command & Control system in the battle at the sea of Gyeong-Sang, Lee required strict command system, and hierarchy with Won-Gyun and Uk-Gi Lee’s fleet, which allowed well-coordinated strategic system. Also, strategy integrated intelligence, maneuver, fires, and force protections against Japanese Force. First, spot the enemy, approach with fleets during earl dawn when security is assured, then charge with turtle ships and full-on assailment of cannons with Pan-Ok ships to defeat Japanese Navy. After such strategy, Lee quickly ran away from the battle scene in order to prepare for the possible ambush attacks and buy some maintenance time for his navy. In summary, Lee achieved the victory via analyzing Japanese Navy’s current status, geography, water current, surround and attack strategy, ambush attacks, and effective maneuvers, which integrated with turtle ships and navy’s fire power. He also inspected his forces, fleets, and other weapons to sustain his combat capabilities. He distributed loots from the battles to his soldiers to alleviate their fear and fatigue. The most important victory factor would be Lee’s victory oriented leadership. His leadership highlighted field focused operations, principles, executions, and keen discernment, which contributed to flexible strategies, all with courage, fairness, people and his navy. In order to win the war, combat capability had to be performed at its best, and Lee’s victories at the initial battles exemplify preparation for the war and successful coordination of combat capability with his leadership in the naval battles.
-
-
코로나19의 생명·연구윤리적 성찰-중국 사례를 중심으로
최용성 ( Choi Yong-seong ),이경식 ( Lee Gyeong-sig ) 한국윤리교육학회 2020 윤리교육연구 Vol.0 No.58
코로나19와 같은 바이러스는 앞으로 더 많은 신종 바이러스의 형태로 발발하며 유행병으로 발발할 수 있다. 따라서 앞으로 지속되는 이런 바이러스부터 우리를 지키는 체계적 대응이 필요하며 이런 차원에서 적절한 연구윤리와 생명윤리가 요청된다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 코로나19사태에 대해 과연 어떻게 중국이 대응했으며, 적절하게 대응했는지 교훈과 성찰을 살피고자 하였다. 특별히 탈정상과학의 시대, 위험사회란 맥락 속에서 중국의 사례를 천착하고자 하였다. 이를 통해 과학적 불확실성 속에서 더욱 요구되는 연구 진실성과 투명한 데이터의 확보에 실패하였으며, 신종 감염병의 특성에 맞는 생명·연구윤리의 실행에서 선제적 대응을 제대로 하지 못했음을 살펴보았다. 헌신적인 의료인들의 돌봄 및 덕의 윤리가 있었지만 전체주의적 생명정치적 상황에서 과학자들의 사회적 책임감이 잘 발현되지 않았으며, 민주적 대응을 억압하는 관료적·과학기술적 대응의 문제와 함께 이해갈등의 해결 및 바람직한 내부고발과 언론· 미디어의 역할 제고가 필요함을 제시하였다. Viruses such as Covid-19 may break out in the form of more new viruses in the future and outbreak as a pandemic. Therefore, it is necessary to respond systematically to protect us from these viruses that will continue in the future, and appropriate research ethics and bioethics are required at this level. Therefore, in this study, we tried to examine lessons and reflections on how China responded to the Covid-19 incident and how appropriate that response was. In particular, in the era of post normal science, in the risk society, it has failed to secure more required research truthfulness and transparent data amidst scientific uncertainty. Although there was an ethic of care and virtue of dedicated medical personnel, the social responsibility of scientists was not well expressed in a totalitarian biopolitical situation. There was also a problem of bureaucratic and scientific technological responses that suppressed democratic responses. And I suggested the need for resolution of conflicts of interest, desirable whistleblowing, and the role of the media.
-
DBpia
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
