RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        거꾸로 하는 문제중심 학습(FPBL) 수업에서 나타난 학생들의 인식론적 프레이밍 분석 - 고등학교 생명과학 동아리 적용 사례를 중심으로 -

        유경주 ( Gyoungju Yu ),차희영 ( Heeyoung Cha ) 한국생물교육학회 2021 생물교육 Vol.49 No.3

        The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of the discourses through epistemological framing and the factors influencing the epistemological framing of high school students involved in FPBL(Flipped and Problem-Based Learning) classes on cancer. FPBL classes in twelve steps were conducted for three weeks with 16 students of a life-science club in a general high school. To collect data from four groups of four students, group activities were recorded as well as the whole-class activities. During the classes, the data from all discourses and activities were collected, and interviews and self-evaluation reports were performed. All the discourses and interviews were transcribed and coded. The analysis showed that discourses regarding ‘finding the right answers’, ‘using only the information given by the teacher’, ‘accumulating information without criticism’, ‘filling in the worksheets without discussion’, ‘producing output to satisfy the teacher’, and ‘being not confident in learning’ were found when classroom-game framing was formed. When making-sense-of-phenomena framing was established, discourses featuring ‘there are no fixed answers’, ‘using one's background knowledge and asking questions with curiosity’, ‘critical search for information and organization of it’, ‘active discussion’, ‘reaching a rational solution’, and ‘expressing self-confidence in learning’ appeared. The factors that affected classroom-game framing were misconceiving unstructuredness of FPBL, misunderstanding the finding-facts step, positioning framing of indicator-receiver, and having the burden to produce output. The factors that affected the formation of making-sense-of-phenomena framing were students’ internalization of problems, the teacher’s feedback, characteristics of the problem-solving step, and positional framing of facilitator-constructor. These results can be useful resources for teachers who want to apply FPBL lessons to their classes to promote learner's epistemological framing.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼