신산업 창출을 위한 규제프리존 정책방향

안혁근 한국경제연구원 2016 한국경제연구원 세미나자료 Vol.16 No.9

수도권 공장총량제 규제 개선 방안

안혁근,장혜선,권경득,원성수,하재룡 한국행정연구원 2006 기본연구과제 Vol.2006 No.-

This study explores the effects of factory location limit s ystem which has two goals, population dispersion of Seoul metropolitan and balanced development between Seoul metr opolitan area and non-Seoul metropolitan area.In order to analyze the effect of the policy, this paper di d literature reviews and quantitative analysis using statisti cal time series data. Also it uncovers micro effect on 23 fi elds of manufacturing industry divided by SIC code.The result shows that the factory location limit system of Seoul metropolitan has a little effect not only on populati on dispersion but also balanced development between Seoul metropolitan and non-Seoul metropolitan. The main reason of a little policy effect about population dispersion is cause d by changed industrial structure from labor-intensive indu stries to capital-intensive industries. The reason of lack of effect about balanced development between Seoul metropoli tan and non-Seoul metropolitan is mainly caused by factori es` move to not outside jurisdiction but within same jurisd iction.

효율적인 수자원관리를 위한 중앙·지방정부의 협력체계 구축에 관한 연구

안혁근,김종래,윤성국 한국행정연구원 2010 기본연구과제 Vol.2010 No.-

Necessity and purpose of the study The demand for various services is increasing rapidly because people want to enjoy a better quality of life along with economic growth. However, a variety of natural resources to support the provision of services cannot be used indefinitely and cannot be increased without limit. One of these important natural resources is water. Therefore, economic and social development will not be easy unless an efficient water management system is established. For this reason, we are currently faced with solving for the problems associated with water resources. The ultimate goal of water management is not only for people safely to use clean water sufficiently but also to protect the property and lives of people from disasters such as droughts and floods. Meanwhile, water management in Korea is not easy compared with other countries due to the concentration of her annual rainfall (60-70%) during the summer and the topographical features of the country, in which the western side is low and eastern side high. Due to these reasons, the government maintains various efforts such as an efficient water management system for continuous water supply and demand management, a comprehensive flood prevention plan, and environmentally friendly water management. As part of these efforts, the government submitted the Water Management Act, which is the basis of integrated and efficient water management, to the National Assembly. Before the Act, water management in Korea was managed by many laws, including the Land Act, Disaster and Safety Management Act, and Act on Environmental Policy Act, which were implemented by various parties such as the central ministries of Land and Traffic, Environment, Local Government and public enterprises. However, the unified Water Management Act expired automatically because of the completion of the 17th Congress in 2008. In this study, a sustainable water resource management system will be described to maximize the value of water utility as a public resource. Also, this study will propose an improvement method of water management by protecting against pollution and abuse of water resources. In particular, the study will propose a way to protect property and the lives of people that prevents conflicts between the central government and local governments. Ultimately, this study will propose an efficient water resource management system to maximize the national and regional economies. Research content and method In Chapter One, we present the needs and objectives of this study and the research methods to establish an efficient system for water resource manage ment. Chapter Two defines the concept of water management systems and presents a classification of water resources, functions of water resources, and the importance and necessity of water resources. The relationship between central and local governments concerning water management systems also is analyzed through a literature review. Chapter Three analyzes the present conditions and characteristics of water resources in Korea based on each factor, while Chapter Four compares the water management systems of the United States, Japan and Europe. Chapter Five presents the results of our questionnaire survey. Finally, Chapter Six contains our proposals for an efficient water management improvement plan and recommended policies for the Water Act. Policy Recommendations and Improvements Based on these research methods and analysis, the following are policy proposals and improvements for the efficient management of water resources and The Water Management Basic Law. Water Resources Management Unit The literature review and questionnaire survey analysis reveal the priority issues of water management. A water management unit is operated based on administrative units rather than basin management units. Rivers can be divided into two parts, one controlled by the country and the other controlled by the local government. In turn, water quantity and quality are managed by the responsible government based on administrative jurisdiction. For this reason, batch processing is very difficult between upper and lower classes in development construction around rivers, water quality management and so on. Also, problems of water concessions cannot be easily solved. The Water Management Basic Act includes water resources management based not on administrative units but rather watershed units as management principles. The watershed management principle is the better way to adjust between stakeholders and improving efficiency of water resource management. Legal System and Water Resources Management Given the weak connection of laws and regulations due to water resource management-related laws and regulations enacted by administrative agencies, laws relating to water quantity are implemented by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Marine Affairs, while laws relating to water quality are managed by the Ministry of the Environment. Laws relating to water resource management do not have a basic law that includes and governs the entirety of water related laws. Therefore, the government in the past has submitted the Water Resource Management Act to Congress. But collectivism between parties saw its denial in the Congress in 1997 and 2006. The results of the survey questionnaire showed that an integrated legal system for water resource management is needed. So the Water Resource Management Act as a basis for an integrated water resource management system should be enacted and remains an urgent priority. In addition, the experience of advanced foreign countries in view of water management should be considered in this regard. The organization for Water management system The Korean government gradually has formed a duplex system acknowledged to be inefficient in the management of water resources because the Korea government has emphasized a development- orientation in the past. Also, the survey questionnaire showed that the nation`s water resources management, currently distributed to many departments in the Korean government, should be made into an integrated management system that is more efficient and more desirable. In order to accomplish this integrated system, active cooperation between water management departments will be required. While an integrated water resource management is one alternative, the other alternative is the establishment of a national committee of water management. This committee would work to adjust, monitor, evaluate, and control water management in an efficient manner. To improve the water management system, the central government also must articulate a unifying critical perspective beyond the selfishness of the status quo stakeholders and suggest alternative actions. Analysis of international practices in the United States under a pluralistic system of water management, wherein the central government`s role is reduced while that of local governments and the private sector has increased. In France, the central government follows a system of unified management of water resources and a river basin management group, while Japan uses a pluralistic system of water management and watershed management. The international community provides a variety of orientations for water management relying on coordination as or instead of a unified management system. In other words, this concept of a committee system that integrates administrative functions may prevent water-related conflicts among central departments and inefficiencies of management. Participation in water resources management Establishment and enforcement of water management plans requires participa tion and cooperation of stakeholders throughout the process. Existing water resources management plans were established by a few bureaucrats and experts through public hearings and deliberations of the committee. The plans are enforced by local governments in a typical top-down approach. However, participation must be guaranteed in order to prevent conflict among stakeholders caused by differences recognizing needs based on development and conservation. Therefore, the legal and institutional basis for various stakeholders` participation in the process of making efficient water resources management should be strengthened. As a result, the difference between diverse interest groups that induces conflicts will be mitigated. Support Tools for Water Resources Management Existing support tools including a preliminary survey related to water resource management, information management, and so on, lack coordination and are inadequate to support and implement an integrated management plan. These problems were reflected in our survey responses. Responding parties accepted the importance of preliminary research about the water environment, ecological and cultural characteristics. However the sharing of information obtained through research showed a low level generally. First, based on the survey results, sufficient financial support for basic research should be increased. Needed is the expansion of professional staff, continuous research and surveys, and establishment of new research institutions Second, water-related and specialized research agencies are necessary because Korea does not have professional organizations for water-related research. Finally, the legal basis for water-related research should be constructed. Standards related to water-related research are not systematic and lack police power. For these reasons, survey data and information also lack consistency.

기업의 행정비용을 감소시키기 위한 정부의 행정간소화 전략

안혁근,김지현 한국행정연구원 2007 기본연구과제 Vol.2007 No.-

After the fundamental law of administrative regulation was enacted in 1997 along with world-wide stream for administrative regulation improvement, researches on administrative burden, such as regulation about scope of administrative burden, range and types of administrative burden, forms of information obligations, measurement of administrative cost, and so on, have actively done for reducing administrative cost of a private company. This research presents the government strategies for administrative simplification which reduce administrative cost induced by administrative burden of a private company. So the administrative simplification strategies of the Korean government can provide the basis of active participation in The Red Tape Scoreboard(RTS) lead by OECD, can create economic activation induced by providing better circumstances for private companies., can increase competitive power of a private company and the government. However, this research has several limitations. In order to the preparation of strategies which reduces administrative cost of enterprises in Korea is based on quantitative data that indicates accurate measurement result about administrative burden of enterprises. However, research on administrative burden measurement of enterprises is undergoing in only two business fields by Korea Small Business Institute and will be done in December, 2007. Therefore, this research can not provide appropriate and quantitative strategies which is proper for business environment in Korea. Therefore, the strategies provided by the research must be followed by more detail strategies which should include implementation plan for national dispersion of administrative simplification, reduction purpose setting about administration burden, introduction method (government-wide/ increment), implementation way, measurement subject selection, and so on.

규제영향분석제도의 실효성 제고 방안

안혁근 한국행정연구원 2014 기본연구과제 Vol.2014 No.-

규제개혁의 내실화를 위한 규제심사 활성화 방안

안혁근 한국행정연구원 2013 기본연구과제 Vol.2013 No.-

규제피해 구제제도의 국가간 비교연구

안혁근,최유성,김신,최유진 한국행정연구원 2011 기본연구과제 Vol.2011 No.-

부동산 관련 규제의 정책효과분석

안혁근 한국행정연구원 2011 기본연구과제 Vol.2011 No.-

중앙-지방 간 협력적 거버넌스의 구축방안

안혁근 한국행정연구원 2015 기본연구과제 Vol.2015 No.-

중앙과 지방정부간 규제전달체계 효율화 방안: 산업안전 규제를 중심으로

안혁근 한국행정연구원 2016 기본연구과제 Vol.2016 No.-