Eojegunggueolji (御製宮闕志) by King Sukjong

An, Jang-li(안장리) 한국학중앙연구원 2013 장서각 Vol.0 No.29

英祖御製 帖本 律文의 종류와 주제

안장리(An Jang-li) 한국학중앙연구원 2006 장서각 Vol.0 No.16

이 논문은 영조어제 첩본 율문의 종류와 주제에 대해 고찰하였다. 영조어제는 간본과 첩본으로 이루어져 있는데 만년 영조의 작품은 대부분 첩본으로 보관되어 있다. 영조어제가 첩본으로 보존된 것은 일차적으로 영조의 효심에서 비롯되었다. 즉 선왕인 숙종보다 많은 시문을 지을 수 없다고 하여 작품마다 첩으로 만들도록 하였던 것이다. 영조는 전통적인 시문을 짓지 않은 대신 독특한 산문과 율문의 작품을 남겼는데 율문의 형식은 3언, 4언, 5언, 6언, 잡언 등으로 이루어져 있다. 특히 이 중에는 3언율문이 가장 많이 있는데 본고에서는 영조가 왜 굳이 3언 율문을 선택했는지 확인하기 위해 다른 갈래와의 연관성을 살펴보았다. 율문 3언 형식과 연관된 자료로는 실록의 비망기, 3언 한시, 악장, 가사 등을 들 수 있는데 비망기에는 신하와의 문답에서 3언으로 기록된 경우가 산견되었다. 3언한시는 중국이나 한국에서 별로 유행하지 않았던 형식임을 확인하였다. 악장에서는 3언으로 이루어진 면이나 음악적 성격 등에서 관련성을 찾았다. 3언 율문의 교술성과 내외 3언을 1구로 설정하여 100언으로까지 확장된다는 점을 가사에 가까운 특성으로 보았다. 이처럼 다양한 갈래와 연관성을 보이는 영조어제첩의 율문은 영조에게는 눈어둡고 귀어두운 만년임에도 하루에 몇 편씩 지을 정도로 익숙한 글쓰기였다. 영조어제 첩본의 주제는 늙고 병들어 늘 약을 끼고 살았던 만년의 한탄이 주조를 이룬다. 자신의 처지에 대한 한탄과 세상에 대한 불만으로 이루어져 있는데 자신에 대한 한탄으로 노년의 처지, 질병의 고통, 가족에 대한 추모 등으로 이루어져 있다. 영조 어제 첩본의 독특한 양식은 효심에서 시작되었으나 자기에게 맞는 문체의 창조로 나아갔다. 즉 3언 율문은 오랜 실험 과정을 거쳐 80세에 정착된 것으로 추정된다. 그리고 이는 한문으로 표현되었지만 우리 정서에 맞는 가창 방법 모색의 일환으로 수립되어진 것으로 평가된다. 영조어제 첩본 5천여편이 십년도 안된 짧은 기간에 창작될 수 있었던 것은 대상 중심에서 자기중심으로 전이되었으며, 특별한 형식에 구애되지 않고 일상적 경험과 추억을 그대로 읊었기에 하루에도 몇 편씩 자술할 수 있었기 때문으로 여겨진다. The paper intends to explain the form and subject of the poetry in King Yongjo's album. The works of King Yongjo was composed with book and album. and the most of that is album. Yongjo did not want to write more works than his father. So he write differnet style. It is composed with three chinese charicters, four chinese charicters, five chinese charicters, six chinese charicters, mix chinese charicters. The most of that is three chinese charicters, At first, he write four chinese charicters for the most part. But after A.D.1771, he write three chinese charicters, The form of three chinese charicters is various. The first is the Bi mang gi (備忘記) that is recorded in Veritable Records of Choseon dynasty. The second is three chinese charicters which was ancient chinese poems. The Third is music texts which existed at early Choseon dynasty. The forth is Gasa(歌辭) which was extended until 100 characters. The subject of three chinese charicters is four. The first is lamenting for the later life. The second is physical pain with disease. The third is look back upon the memory of his late familly. The forth is discontented with the way of the world.

야은 길재에 대한 추숭과 비판에 대한 연구

안장리(An, Jang-Li) 포은학회 2016 포은학연구 Vol.18 No.-

유교국가인 조선시대 역사기록은 왕조중심으로 씌어졌고 자신이 속한 왕조의 입장에서 씌어질 수밖에 없었다. 길재는 왕조초기의 추숭, 사림시대도통의 제2인자로의 옹립과 추숭, 그리고 18세기 왕들과 서민교화의 전범으로서의 추숭 등 조선 전시대에 걸쳐 절대적인 추숭을 받았다. 남효온, 박세채 등에 의해 은연 중에 신씨를 섬긴 인물, 삼년상을 치를 필요 없는 스승에 대해 삼년상을 행한 인물 등으로 평가받기도 했으나 이런 논란에 대해서도 이황, 정경세, 안정복 등 당대 인사들로부터 옹호를 받았다. 이황은 공민왕이 우왕을 후계로 인정하였으므로 신씨여부는 중요하지 않다고 하였고, 정 경세는 신씨설에 대해 의심하는 사람이 많다고 하였으며, 안정복은 신씨라는 설에 대해 논평하지 않을 수 없다고 하여 신씨설에 대한 비판의 강도를 높였다. 나아가 길재와 정몽주와 같은 위인이 섬겼다면 신씨일리 없다는 입장을 표명함으로써 신씨 조작설에 힘을 실어주었다. 본고에서는 길재 절의 추숭에 대한 시대적 변모를 정리했을 뿐 아니라 길재의 절의에 대한 논란을 통해 단편적으로 남아있는 역사기록의 한계, 세태에 따라 달라질 수 있는 역사기록의 맹점 등을 극복하는 과정도 확인할수 있었다. Built on the ideas of Confucianism, Chosun and it’s historical records were written around the kings. The historical records were only possible to be written in the perspective of the king during the time of documentation. It would not be considered overly exaggerated to state that Gil-Jae was praised after his death without further questioning during the entire Chosun Dynasty. Gil-Jae has been posthumously praised and enthroned as second-in-command of the Do-tong during the era of the Confucian scholars. He was also recognized after his death during the early years of Chosun, and recalled by his reformation act of the people and the kings during the 18th century. On the contrary, Kil-Jae was also denounced by critiques. He was well-known for serving Shin through Nam Hyo-on, Park sae-chae, etc and mourning a teacher, who did not need to be recognized as a person of a third year memorial service, for three years. However, even after the negative judgements, the most recognized and eminent persons during the times of Chosun such as Lee Hwang, Ahn Jung-Bok, Jung Gyung-se, etc appraised that Kil-Jae should be highly respected by his fidelity to principle, integrity and honor. Lee Hwang stated that King Gong-min has accepted King Woo as his successor and Jung Kyung-se announced that there are many who are doubtful towards the rumors of Shin. Ahn Jung-bok wanted more comments and further discussions regarding the rumors of Shin and heavily criticized such rumors. Ahn Jung-bok added his indication that if great men like Kil-Jae and Jung Mong-Joo served as followers, it would not have been Shin; Ahn empowered Shin’s fabricated story. This research will discuss the Kil-Jae’s posthumous praises about his fidelity to principle, integrity and honor have changed through time and the process of overcoming the limitations, the affect of loopholes through different social conditions, etc of historical documents by looking into the arguments and controversies of Kil-Jae’s fidelity.

조선시대 정몽주 숭모 양상 고찰 : 국왕을 중심으로

안장리(An, Jang-li) 포은학회 2021 포은학연구 Vol.28 No.-

이 논문은 『조선왕조실록』, 『승정원일기』 『포은집』 등을 중심으로 조선시대 포은 숭모 양상을 고찰하는 한편 이를 다시 개인 차원의 숭모, 국가 차원의 숭모, 가문대상의 숭모로 구분하여 정리하였다. 이를 통해 조선 전기의 성종과 중종, 조선후기의 선조와 숙종 그리고 영조 등은 조선의 기틀을 세우고 국난으로 무너진 기강을 재건하는데 있어서 그리고 유교국가로서 조선의 정체성을 강조하기 위해 정몽주 숭모에 남다른 정성을 드렸다고 할 수 있으나 조선 태종대 이후 역대 국왕 중에 개인 차원의 숭모, 국가 차원의 숭모, 가문대상의 숭모를 수행하지 않은 왕은 없음을 밝혔다. 본고에서는 조선시대의 대표적 가치인 충절과 유학의 표상인 정몽주 가문을 유지 존속시키고 이에 대한 국가 차원의 치제를 수행한 조선 역대 국왕의 숭모행위가 특정 국왕의 개별적 행위라기보다는 조선이라는 국가유지를 위해 수행해야 할 역대 조선국왕의 기본적인 업무였음을 확인하였다. This study set out to examine the patterns of admiring Poeun among the kings of Joseon and classified them into admiration at the individual, national, and family level with a focus on the Annals of the Joseon Dynasty, Seungjeongwonilgi and Poeunjip. The findings show that Kings Seongjong and Jungjong in the former part of Joseon and Kings Seonjo, Sukjong, and Yeongjo in the latter part of Joseon put their whole minds to the admiration of Jeong Mong-ju to establish the foundation of Joseon, rebuild the discipline that fell due to a national crisis, and emphasize Joseon s identity as a Confucian state. Since King Taejong, all the kings of Joseon admired Jeong at the individual, national, and family level. The findings of the present study show that the kings of Joseon engaged in the act of admiring Jeong Mong-ju, who represented loyalty, one of Joseon s representative values, and was a model of Confucianism, by keeping and maintaining his family and supporting his memorial service with financial aids as part of their basic duties as a king of Joseon to maintain the state rather than a personal practice by certain kings.

소상팔경(瀟湘八景) 수용과 한국팔경시의 유행 양상

안장리(An, Jang-Li) 숭실대학교 한국문학과예술연구소 2014 한국문학과 예술 Vol.13 No.-

중국 소상팔경 문화는 한국에 유행하여 문학, 미술, 조경 분야에 지대한 영향을 끼쳤다. 이처럼 소상팔경문화가 한국에 유행한 이유는 무엇일까? 본고에서는 문학 분야 한국팔경시를 대상으로 그 이유를 살펴보았으며, 일상성과 전범성의 원리에 의해 한국팔경시가 유행하게 되었음을 밝혔다. 고려 명종대 유입된 소상팔경은 중국 명승인 소상강지역의 여덟 경승을 시와 그림으로 향유하는 탈속적이고 고고한 문화의 전범이었다. 그러나 이규보는 소상팔경시를 시재를 겨루는 도구로 인식하게 하고 소상팔경에 등장하는 기러기를 사람들의 주살을 두려워하는 생활속의 경물로 변화시켜 친근하고 일상적인 경관으로 만들었다. 이제현은 중국에 있으면서 고국의 수도 송도를 팔경시의 대상으로 삼아 팔경의 한국화를 이루었으며, 이에 따라 자신의 고향, 부임지 등 주변 경관의 일상적인 모습을 팔경시로 읊는 풍조가 유행하게 되었다. 이색은 자신의 고향인 한산을 팔경의 대상으로 삼아 한산팔경시를 지었고 안축은 자신의 부임지인 삼척을 대상으로 삼척팔경시를 지었다. 한국팔경시의 유행은 한국팔경시의 전범화를 촉진시켜 자신의 목적을 선전하는 도구로서 한국팔경시를 활용하는 사례도 나타났다. 정도전은 새로운 도읍을 팔경시로 노래하였고, 김종직은 자기 고향 사람들의 유교 생활 실천을 천양하였다. 심지어 수양을 중요시한 사림들이 은거지에서의 수양생활을 팔경의 대상으로 삼는데 까지 이르렀으며, 임금 또한 자신의 후원공간을 팔경의 대상으로 삼는 등 한국팔경시는 일상화와 전범화의 원리에 의해 지역과 계층을 초월하여 유행하게 되었다. The Chinese culture of Eight Views of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers was in vogue in Korea and had enormous impacts on Korean culture, art, and landscaping. What were the reasons behind its fashion in Korea? This study examined the reasons through the Palgyeong poetry of Korea and found that the poetry was in vogue according to the principles of ordinariness and canonicity. Being introduced in Goryeo during the reign of King Myeongjong, the Eight Views of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers were a canon of unworldly and aloof culture to enjoy the eight picturesque sceneries of the Xiaoxiang River, one of the scenic spots in China, through poems and paintings. Lee Gyu-bo made the poetry of Eight Views of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers perceived as a tool to compete over poetic materials and turned the wild geese in the Eight Views of the Xiao and Xiang Rivers into the natural features in life that were afraid of human arrows, thus making them as part of the familiar daily landscape. Staying in China, Lee Je-hyeon made Palgyeong a Korean style with the Palgyeong poems on Songdo, the capital of his home country. There was a trend in vogue which depicted the daily aspects of surrounding landscape such as one"s hometown and new post with Palgyeong poems. Lee Saek wrote Hansan Palgyeong poems with Hansan, his hometown, as the object of Palgyeong. Ahn Chuk wrote Samcheok Palgyeong poems with his new post Samcheok as the object. The fashion of Korean Palgyeong poetry facilitated its canonization and thus resulted in cases of using it as a tool to promote one"s goals. Jeong Do-jeon sang about the new capital with Palgyeong poems, and Kim Jong-jik spread the practice of Confucian life among the people of his hometown. Even the Sarims that valued cultivation made their cultivation life at the retirement places the object of Palgyeong, and the kings made their back gardens the object of Palgyeong. Those cases indicate that the Korean Palgyeong poetry was in vogue regardless of region and social class according to the principles of popularization and canonization.

영조(英祖) 궁궐 인식의 특징

안장리(An Jang-li) 한국학중앙연구원 2006 한국학 Vol.29 No.3

인문학적 사유를 바탕으로 한 장르변형 글쓰기

안장리(Jang Li An) 연세대학교 국학연구원 2005 동방학지 Vol.130 No.-

「 비해당48영시 」의 팔경시적 특성

안장리(An Jang li) 연민학회 1997 연민학지 Vol.5 No.-

N/A

『담원국학산고(蕁園國學散藁)』와 『연민국학산고(淵民國學散藁)』 비교

안장리 ( Jang Li An ) 연민학회 2014 연민학지 Vol.21 No.-

This paper presents comparison between Damwon Jeong In-bo and Yeonmin Lee Ga-won that brought up talents at Yonsei University in terms of Korean studies research. The purpose of this study was to illuminate the research and significance of Korean studies at Yonsei University and also at private schools across the nation with a focus on Damwongukhaksango and Yeonmingukhaksango. The investigator sorted out the content of Damwongukhaksango according to five topics, namely, “Yang-ming studies,” “Shilhak,” “patriotic figures and national historiography” “language and literature,” and “national defense and geography.” Yeonmingukhaksango was arranged according to “Confucianism and Shilhak,” “historic figures,” “letters and Chinese literature” and “calligraphy and seal engra ving.” The two authors were compared in Korean studies research according to “philosophy and Shilhak,” “history and figures” and “language and literature.“ Jeong In-bo practiced Korean studies as an effort to resist the Joseon culture annihilation policy by the ruling Japanese. Under the goal of promoting the superior identity of Joseon, he conducted researches in the fields of history and philosophy and even created literary works. Such efforts of his helped to put “Shilhak” in the spotlight as the origin of Korean studies, highlight “national historiography” and “Shijo literature,” and evaluate Jeong as one of the representative Korean studies researchers. Lee Ga-won found the subject of Korean studies in Confucian culture that was annihilated by the ruling Japanese. Believing that the nation was brought to the verge of collapse because of no right succession and practice of Confucian culture, he studied Lee Hwang that succeeded the heritage of Zhu-xi studies, argued for the introduction of practical scientific things, and carried out investigations into scholars and literary figures of the second half of Joseon including Park Ji-won that had a critical view of history and society.

연민(淵民) 이가원(李家源)의 인물전(人物傳) 일고(一考)

안장리 ( Jang Li An ) 연민학회 2012 연민학지 Vol.17 No.-

Yeonmyeon tried to write a history like Sima Quan`s 『Shiji (historical records)』. But, he didn`t leave a history. Therefore, this study considered Yeonmyeon`s view of history and man through his 『Brief biographies of Korea Master 』and 『Lee Dynasty Master series 』. Because it is the basis of describing a history. Even though Yeonmyeon`s Inmuljeon(Peoples) is not a figure dictionary, it has a characteristic to treat a large quantity of 1669 figures. This is due to Yeonmyeon`s view of history in which he recognized the necessary of different class and ability. This article determined that Yeonmyeon`s Inmuljeon(Peoples) has the characteristic to consider very important in one`s position in the historical context rather than define the total aspect of an individual people. Then, Yeonmyeon estimated that Jeong mong-ju was the man who died for his loyalty, on the contrary to this, Jeong do-jeon was a status seeker who betrayed the Kingdom of Goryeo, furthermore raised up the treason to Joseon Dynasty also. For explaining a man, he estimated an ability connecting a family to a scholastic mantle, and a people based on the criterion that was used in that time such as Neo-Confucianism, a sentence and government post, however, he also estimated a man who was a lowly status such as the public, or an artist who was supposed to be non-person, and even a betrayer as being worth enough, if they had a good ability in a science and a sentence, or left a good work, or tried to revise the irrationality in the World. Moreover, he had put the devotion to one`s country and to ones people on the best value. This is also because the purpose of writing the Inmuljeon was based on the devotion to Yeonmyeon`s country and to his people. This paper determined that Yeonmyeon`s Inmuljeon carried on the spirit of scholar of the Realist School of Confucianism in the lad of Joseon Dynasty, which drew the country where has the absurdity of the age when a talented person is not used and great pride what the country has many talented person. In addition, this study has found that in the Inmuljeon, Yeonmyeon interestingly introduced various peoples and the hidden side of them who appeared in a history by understanding that the humble patriot, such as An yong-bok, didn`t have a post to stand in the historical presentation based on history and politics which was riddled with a series of a historical story and political strife recorded by the privileged class of high standing.