RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      • 좁혀본 항목

      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
          • 원문제공처
          • 등재정보
          • 학술지명
          • 주제분류
          • 발행연도
          • 작성언어
          • 저자

        오늘 본 자료

        • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
        더보기
        • 무료
        • 기관 내 무료
        • 유료
        • KCI등재

          柞伯鼎과 西周 후기 전쟁금문에 나타난 왕과 제후의 군사적 유대

          심재훈(Jae-hoon Shim) 중국고중세사학회 2013 중국고중세사연구 Vol.0 No.29

          Most scholars working on the Western Zhou consider its late period as the time of decline. As for the reason, they note the alienation between the royal house and feudal states caused by the weakening of the “Lineage Law” (zongfa 宗法) and “Fengjian” 封建 systems. However, the late Western Zhou warfare inscriptions such as the Zuobo ding clearly show that the royal house maintained strong military ties with feudal lords even in the late Western Zhou period. The general understanding of their estrangement followed by the royal decline seems to contradict with their strong military alliance documented in the late Western Zhou warfare inscriptions. This inconsistency cannot be understood well in the dichotomy between the royal house and the feudal lords which has been prevailed in the theoretical studies of the Western Zhou state. Rather, the new conceptual division between the "Zhou Polity" (Zhoubang 周邦) and the “Others” (Tabang 他邦) could be a new vista to explain the contradiction. The consciousness of the “Zhou Polity” increasingly shared by the royal house and the feudal states must have motivated their strong military ties against the “Others” even in the late Western Zhou when the authority of the king was already in decline.

        • 서주사(西周史)의 새로운 발견: 산동성고청현진장서주성지(山東省高靑縣陳莊西周城址)와 인궤(引궤)명문

          심재훈 ( Jae Hoon Shim ) 단국사학회 2011 史學志 Vol.43 No.-

          최근 山東省高靑縣陳莊西周遺址의 발굴은 西周史와 齊國史연구에 귀중한 자료를 더해준다. 이 연구는 陳莊遺址의 고고학 성과를 소개하고 거기서 발견된 가장 중요한 기물인 引궤명문을 해석하면서, 그 城址가 齊의 도읍이 아니라 周왕실이나 齊國이 관할한군사기지였을 가능성을 제기한다. 서주 중후기 齊師(제의 군사기지나 제국 군대)에 대한周王의 장악을 암시하는 引궤명문과 관련하여, 필자는 周王이 齊國과 같은 封國들에 강력한 권위를 행사했을 가능성을 인정한다. 그렇지만 그 장악의 정도가 개별 왕들의 역량이나 왕국 발전의 추이에 따라 차이가 있었을 가능성도 함께 제시한다. 引궤명문에 나타나는 周王의 齊師의 장악이 이례적인 경우일 가능성도 열어두어야 한다는 것이다. 따라서 引궤명문이 서주 중후기 군사력 운용을 둘러싼 왕실과 封國사이의 역학 관계에 중요한실마리를 제공하고 있지만, 그와 유사한 맥락의 새로운 명문들이 발견되거나 또 다른 정황 증거가 제시되기 전까지 무리한 추론은 자제하는 것이 좋을 듯하다. The recent discovery of the walled-town of Chenzhuang sheds new lights in the historical study of the Western Zhou and its feudal state Qi. Introducing the archaeological achievements of the site and translating the Yin gui inscription, one of the most important objects from the site, the author proposes the walled-town was not a capital of Qi but a military base administered either by the royal Zhou or the state of Qi. As for the inscription which signifies the Zhou king`s control over the military base at Qi or the army of Qi in the middle or late Western Zhou, the author acknowledge the possibility that Zhou kings may have exerted strong authority over the feudal states such as Qi. However, it varied depending on each king`s capability. The only example of such strong king`s authority documented in the Yin gui inscription cannot fully justify the argument. Thus, it is not until the discovery of more such inscriptions that we could propose the final conclusion on the Western Zhou kings` authority over the feudal lords.

        • KCI등재

          민족주의적 동아시아 고대사 서술과 그 자료 새롭게 보기

          沈載勳(Shim Jae-hoon) 역사학회 2010 역사학보 Vol.0 No.208

          Comparing the development of the nationalistic historiography of Japan, China and Korea during the 20th century, this study finds a general trend in the respective development. The current Chinese drive to the height of the nationalistic historiography seems to correspond with that of Japan's during the 1930s-40s and Korea's during the 1980s-90s. Such an understanding may ease the suspicion many Koreans have had about the political intention under the Chinese history projects such as the "Northeast Project." The abundant paleographic materials recently discovered in China, especially the Warring States bamboo slips, have provided a new insight into the received texts at our disposal. Most transmitted texts seem to have been recreated or rewritten during the Han period. This is the reason why the philological studies both for the plaeographic and transmitted texts will be a new vista in understanding ancient East Asia. It would be desirable for Korean scholars to free from "the obsession to ours," considering early China and its sources as the cradle of the East Asian civilization.

        • KCI등재

          大河口 霸伯墓 출토 西周 청동예악기 파격의 양면성

          沈載勳(Jae-hoon Shim) 동양사학회 2013 東洋史學硏究 Vol.125 No.-

          The recent excavations of the Peng ? cemetery at Hengshui 橫水, Jiang Prefecture 絳縣 and Ba ? cemetery at Dahekou 大河口, Yicheng Prefecture 翼城縣 in southwestern Shanxi provide valuable information on the development of regional polities there led by the state of Jin 晉 in the Western Zhou period. This study examines various issues on the excavations critically, especially pointing out that the previous scholarships on the nature of the two polities, Peng and Ba, toward Jin, the feudal state of Zhou in the region, have been obsessed with the dichtomy of “independence” or “subordination.” Instead, focusing on the unbalance and exception of the funerary practices in the two Dahekou tombs (M1 and M1017) of Ba rulers, this study suggests the ambivalence of the regional Ba and Peng polities. This ambivalence seems to have signified the process of the assimilation from the pro-Shang indigenous polities to the regional polities under the Zhou realm. Therefore, it is more evident to propose the role Jin, the feudal state of Zhou, played for overseeing the neighboring polities such as Ba and Peng in southwestern Shanxi.

        • KCI등재

          구미 동아시아학의 발전과 그 수용을 위한한국판 DB 구축

          심재훈 ( Jae Hoon Shim ) 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원 2014 大東文化硏究 Vol.0 No.87

          400년 이상의 역사를 지닌 구미의 동아시아학은 양적 질적으로 풍부한 성과를산출하고 있다. 1960년대 이후부터나 태동한 근대적 의미의 한국 동아시아학도 짧은 역사 속에서 상당한 발전을 거듭하고 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 한국에서의 동아시아학이 과연 국제적으로 주변부의 위치에서 벗어나고 있는지 아쉬움도 존재한다. 이러한 아쉬움의 주요 원인 중 하나를 구미학계 연구 성과와의 소통 부족에서 찾고있는 필자는 그 성과의 한국적 수용을 위한 DB 구축을 한국연구재단의 토대연구지원사업으로 진행하고 있다. 20세기 초반 이래 구미에서는 동아시아학의 유용한 참고자료들이 다양한 형태로 인쇄본으로 존재했고, 1990년대 이후부터는 이를 양적으로 확대한 DB들이 구축되기 시작했다. 이러한 다양한 참고자료나 DB 양식들 중해제목록(annotated bibliography)의 방식에 착안한 본 토대연구는 영문, 불문, 독문으로 출간된 주요 단행본 약 3,000권과 논문 약 8,000편을 비교적 상세히 소개하는 DB로 탄생할 것이다. 다양한 검색 기능을 갖춘 본 DB가 한국 동아시아학의 소통 확대에 기여할 수 있으리라 기대한다. The East Asian studies in the West have a long history of more than 400years, producing remarkable achievements both in quality and quantity. Despite the short history since 1960s, the studies in Korea in the modernsense have been developed in their own way. Nevertheless, it is regrettable to recognize how well the scholarships in Korea have been acknowledged in the international academia. Noting the insufficient communications with the Western scholarships as one of the main reasons for the regretfulness, I have got a Ground Research Grant from the Korea Research Foundation for establishing a database of English-, French-, and German-Language studies on East Asia. Various references for the studies on East Asia have been produced in the West since the early 20th century, and they are eventually developing into huge databases from the 1990s. Inspired by the annotated bibliographies among others of the West, my research project will establish a Korean database that introduces about 3,000 monographs and 8,000 articles of the above three western languages. I expect the database will contribute to expand the Korean communications with the Western scholarships.

        • KCI등재

          周代를 읽는 다른 방법 : 자료와 체계의 양면성

          심재훈(Jae-hoon Shim) 중국고중세사학회 2011 중국고중세사연구 Vol.0 No.26

          This is a critical review of the three recently published books on the Zhou dynasty, Chinese Society in the Age of Confucius (2006) by Lothar von Falkenhausen, and Landscape and Power in Early China (2006) and Bureaucracy and the State in Early China (2009) by Li Feng. While the former focuses on the social and religious history of the Zhou, the latter two examine political and institutional history of the dynasty. However, the two authors demonstrate quite different understandings on the sources and methodology in studying the Zhou period. Whereas Falkenhausen, an archaeologist from Germany, values excavated materials from tombs higher than any other sources, Li Feng, a historian from China, rather treats the other sources such as transmitted and paleographic texts with equal weight. While Falkenhausen never tries to reconstruct the Zhou society as a system, Li Feng argues the geopolitical reasons for the Western Zhou’s collapse as well as a single bureaucratic structure of the dynasty. This different methodologies further lead them to propose completely different ideas on the metropolitan area of the Zhou and the dynasty’s development from the previous Shang. To Falkenhausen, the area was a fairly haphazard agglomeration of religious and residential compounds. The first two centuries of the Zhou was just a. continuation of the preceding Shang dynasty. To Li Feng, on the contrary, the metropolitan center of the Zhou must have been a space of comparable size and planned structural complexity. The Zhou state was formed on different principles from the incipient Shang state. Reflecting the current status of the fast-evolving field of research, however, these seemingly contradictory understandings do not depreciate both authors’ insightful and compelling scholarship on the Zhou. All the same, they cannot be completely free from criticisms. Falkenhausen’s strong doubt about the authenticity of the transmitted texts conflicts with his own reliance on the very sources in some of the main arguments. Li Feng’s obsession to the systematic structure of the Zhou state seems have led him to build a government considerably sophisticated but more amplified than its probable reality.

        • 구미의 한국 상고사 연구와 하버드 "고대한국 프로젝트"

          심재훈 ( Jae Hoon Shim ) 단국사학회 2016 史學志 Vol.52 No.-

          구미의 한국 상고사 연구는 양적으로 극히 부족하다. 무엇보다 경험적 논증을 중시하는 구미 학계의 입장에서 자료가 거의 없는 고조선을 비롯한 한국 상고사 연구는 주요 관심 대상이 되기 어려웠을 것이다. 나아가 현재 한국 학계에서조차도 고조선의 공간 범위와 존속 시대에 대한 논의가 분분한 상황이다. 존재가 명확한 기원전 2세기 위만조선 이전의 그 모호함 역시 고조선을 중요 연구 주제로 부각되기 어렵게 하는데 일조했을 것이다. 이러한 측면에서 동북아역사재단과 국제교류재단에서 2007년 하버드대학의 이른바 ``고대한국 프로젝트``를 지원하기 시작한 것은 적절해 보인다. 이미 고대 한국에 관한 세 권의 시리즈와 다른 세 권의 단행본을 출간한 그 프로젝트는 상당히 성공적이었다. 그러나 한국의 정치권과 결탁한 유사역사가들이 그 프로젝트의 낙랑군 평양설 수용을 비판함으로써, 그 탄탄한 프로젝트가 막을 내리게 되었다. 그들의 비판에 근거가 결여되어 있는 만큼, 이 근시안적 결정은 반드시 재고되어야 할 것이다. This review article surveys Western scholarships on Old Choson as well as the current status of the ``Harvard Early Korea Project`` sponsored by the Northeast History Foundation and Korea Foundation. There must have been some reasons for the lack of the scholarship in the field except for Hyung Il Pai`s Constructing "Korean" Origins. First of all, it is very difficult for the Western scholars, who are accustomed to the empirical approach, to have an interest in the field with such a scanty source. The space and time span of the Old Choson is still unclear as well, so that they are suspicious about the historicity of the polity before the second century B.C. The Old Choson does not seem to have been an appropriate topic for historical research in the West. In this regard, Korean government began to provide a grant in 2007 to the Korea Institute at Harvard University for the ``Early Korea Project.`` The project seems to have been successful in that they published each three volumes of Early Korea and the occasional series. The six volumes efficiently cover various important topics in Early Korean history. However, the pseudo-historians and politicians in Korea criticized the location of Lelang Commandery not in Manchuria but in the present-day Pyongyang area in The Han Commanderies in Early Korean History edited by Mark Byington, so that they forced the Northeast History Foundation to stop providing the grant. Believing the criticisms totally groundless, I hope they reconsider the short-sighted decision.

        • KCI우수등재

          ‘요동사’와 그 이후

          심재훈(Shim, Jae-Hoon) 역사학회 2017 역사학보 Vol.0 No.234

          The History of Liaodong, published in 2004 by Hankyu Kim, has been one of the hottest issues in the studies of early Korean history. Kim’s new paradigm advocates that the History of Lioadong or Manchuria should be separated from the mainstream Chinese history. It in turn means that Old Joseon and Goguryeo, which Korean people believe as the integral parts of their ancient realm, are more properly considered as parts of the Liaodong history. It goes without saying that nationalist historians both in Korea and China have severely criticized the History of Liaodong. This study first argues that Korean scholars’ criticisms about the History of Liaodong do not seem to have been valid, rather revealing the weak points for the national history which embraces both Manchuria and the Korean peninsula in their ancient realm. It further associates the History of Liaodong with the so-called New Qing History in America and, especially, the Mansenshi of Japanese colonialist historians. The similarities among the three historical paradigms appreciate the scholarly significance of the History of Laiodong. Korean scholars’ criticisms of Kim as a follower of the colonialist history are indeed biased and groundless.

        • KCI등재

          갈 길이 먼 소수 정예의 발버둥

          沈載勳(Jae-hoon Shim) 동양사학회 2015 東洋史學硏究 Vol.133 No.-

          I have surveyed the Korean scholarship on pre-Qin history for last two decades. Only about thirteen scholars have produced their Ph.D. dissertations covering various topics in the field. Despite the limited quantity, the quality of the scholarship seems to have reached a certain level. Nevertheless, I would like to propose some methodological problems we need to reconsider. First, noting the excessive utilization of archaeological materials all over China, we must be very careful for the illusion of the cultural unification since the Neolithic period. Second, easy pictographic interpretations of ancient scripts such as oracle bone inscriptions may mislead to an exaggerated historical understanding. Third, uncareful mixed quotations between transmitted and excavated texts may also depreciate the value of the research.

        • KCI등재
        맨 위로 스크롤 이동