http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 백종오 (검색결과 99 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
白種伍 한국고대학회 2006 先史와 古代 Vol.24 No.-
The formation background of the Goguryeo Dynasty Maksae(瓦當), which refers to tiles decorated on the edges of the eaves. As for the origination of the Goguryeo Dynasty roof tiles, it is suspected to be earlier than the roof tiles of the Silla Dynasty, noting that the roof tiles were mentioned in the myth of the founder of the Goguryeo Dynasty. In other words, independent production of roof tiles was possible in the times of King Taejo(太祖王) based on the advanced social foundation with long-accumulated earthenware production technology. As for Maksae, the production time of snail-patterned Maksae was suspected at least to be before the 4th year of Taenyung(太寧四年, A.D. 326). It was noted that snail-patterned Maksae at that time had unique patterns and the production methods differed from those of China. The people of the Goguryeo Dynasty made unique snail-patterned Maksae and special-purpose roof tiles based on a stable atmosphere in the society and the strong power of King Bongsang(烽上王) when there were few conflicts with Northern foreign nations. In order to determine from what social background the Goguryeo's Maksae were made, both the pattern structure of the Maksae and thesocial background were investigated. The philosophy system of the Goguryeo Dynasty was Taoism combined with traditional religions. Thus, the patterns of Maksae were set, snail-shaped, expressing the flow of Yin(陰) and Yang(陽), and the lines symbolizing every direction of the world. It appears that a lotus-pattern emerged during the times of King Gogukyang(故國壤王) when Buddhism was actively encouraged. 필자는 고구려 기와와 와당의 발생과정 그리고 그 형성 배경에 대한 추론을 통하여 고구려 기와의 기원을 『三國史記』기사에 보이는 신라기와보다 이른 시기로 비정하였다. 또 고구려의 기와 사용은 고구려 시조 전승의 내용에 반영되어 있는 것으로 상정하였다. 즉, 태조왕대 고구려가 본격적으로 계루부 중심의 왕위 세습체제를 정비하고 시조전승을 확립하였으며, 이 무렵 중국·낙랑과의 접촉을 통해 경제적인 부를 축적하여 고대국가의 기틀을 마련하였다. 고구려의 발전은 중국과 동등한 수준의 문화 수용의지를 촉발시켰고 축적되었던 토제품의 생산기술을 바탕으로 자체적인 기와 생산이 가능하였다고 추정하였다.이어 등장한 와당의 출현 시기는 적어도 太寧4年(326) 이전에 발생한 것으로 추정되는데 당시의 권운문 와당에서 중국이나 한사군의 영향보다는 독자적인 문양과 제작방식이 확인된다. 즉, 고구려인들은 북조세력과의 대결이 소강상태로 접어드는 봉상왕 재위 무렵 안정된 사회분위기와 강력한 왕권을 바탕으로 독자적인 권운문 와당과 특수기와를 만들어 낼 수 있었다.이와 같은 고구려 와당은 일찍부터 확립된 도교와 전통신앙의 결합된 사상체계에 바탕을 두고 있으며, 와당의 표면에 陰陽의 氣가 흐르는 것을 표현한 권운문과 五方, 天圓地方을 상징하는 구획선으로 정형화 되었던 것이다. 한편, 연화문 수막새의 발생시점은 왕실에 의해 불교가 적극적으로 장려되는 고국양왕대로 보았다.
-
-
-
고려 후기 忠州城의 신지견 -충주 계족산 城址를 중심으로-
백종오 백산학회 2023 白山學報 Vol.- No.126
This article examines the consistency of the location of Chungjuseong [meaning Chungju Fortress and in other words, Chungju Sanseong meaning Chungju Mountain Fortress], the site of one of the most dramatic battles of the Goryeo-Mongol War(1231-1273), through the perspective of a new discovery. Various hypotheses related to Chungjuseong Fortress have emerged so far, such as Nam Sanseong, Daerim Sanseong, Chungju Eupseong, Deokju Sanseong, etc. Among them, Chungju Eupseong as the fortress of the province and Daerim Sanseong as the mountain fortress have been regarded as persuasive. However, serving as a mountain fortress for defense and protection was done at high and rugged mountain fortresses such as Yang sanseong, Yanggeunseong, Cheonryong Sanseong, and Ibam Sanseong, which are recorded in the literature. In line with this, the fortress site of Gyejoksan Mountain in Chungju proved to have conformity with Chungju Fortress [Chungju Sanseong]. Until now, the fortress site of Gyeyoksan Mountain has been recognized as an extension of the territorial range of Simhanghyeon in the Joseon Dynasty. Thus, the walls were thought to be not related to Chungju Sanseong during the Goryeo-Mongol War. However, Mt. Gyejoksan (now Mt. Gyemyungsan) is the main mountain of Chungju and shows a rugged mountainous position for a fortress site. In addition, based on the main defense direction toward Chungju Town, construction technique of the Goryeo Dynasty, and excavated artifacts, the site was judged to be highly likely to be related to Geum Yun-hu, who was a defense official of Chungju Sanseong. In other words, it was the site of battles such as the 1st(1231),5th(1253), and6th (1256) Mongol invasions. In between, the battles of Geumdanggyeop (1253), Daincheolso (1254), Daewonryeong (1255), and Parkdalhyeon (1258) are also believed to have occurred around this place. The Mongolian method of warfare in the Goryeo-Mongol War was to use local forces that had surrendered to the Mongols. This has the vulnerability of exposing internal information in the battles to defense the capital. In other words, a Goryeo army had to fight against another Goryeo people combined with Mongolian army. The Battle of Chungju Sanseong (1253) had significance in that it provided the opportunity to overcome and recover the asymmetry of this strategy through tripod-shaped terrain site, the high and rugged location, and the guerrilla warfare. This is the first time the outline of the fortress site of Gyejoksan Mountain has been identified. We hope that it will shed new light on the location of Chungjuseong [Chungju Sanseong] in the late Goryeo Dynasty and its historical development. It is also hoped that academic research on the Gyeyoksan fortress site will be conducted in a systematic manner so that the overall status, structure, and consecration techniques of the fortress can be clarified.
-
白種伍,吳大洋 동아시아고대학회 2014 동아시아고대학 Vol.0 No.34
遼東地域의 支石墓는 현재까지 600여 基가 보고되었다. 주로 太子河 流域을 경계로 남부와 북부지역이 密集圈을 이루고 있다. 遼東 南部圈은 대부분 卓子式이고 개석식은 소수이다. 지석묘의 기원과 상한 연대에 대해서는 여러 의견이 존재하지만, 紀元前 10世紀 전후부터 築造되었다는 견해에 대부분 동의 하고 있다. 그러나 普蘭店 王屯遺蹟에서 雙砣子2期文化인 紀元前 16世紀의 유물이 출토된 바 있으며, 또 최근 일부 탁자식 지석묘의 구조 및 축조방법 등이 雙砣子3期文化의 積石墓와 매우 유사한 것으로 밝혀져 주목된다. 蓋石式 支石墓는 紀元前 12~11世紀 전후 太子河流域의 馬城子文化(洞窟墓)가 주변 지역으로 擴散되는 과정 중 遼東 南部의 支石墓 文化와 接觸하여 出現한 것으로 이해하고 있다. 鳳城 東山遺蹟의 경우 紀元前 12~11世紀로 편년되는데, 지석묘의 덮개돌〔蓋石〕이 殘存하며 墓室 構造와 出土遺物은 洞窟墓의 傳統을 維持하는 특징을 보인다. 遼東 北部圈은 분포 지역과 조성 연대에 따라 지역별 형식이 다르게 나타난다. 卓子式은 輝發河 流域 을 중심으로 遼北 각지에 분포하지만, 太子河 流域은 除外되는 양상이다. 墓室 밖으로 다량의 積石施 設이 특징적이다. 이와 달리 蓋石式은 太子河 流域에 분포하고 편년이 늦을수록 墓室 周邊에 積石施設 이 附加된 경우가 많다. 이들 지석묘는 덮개돌의 규모가 縮小되는 傾向性을 보여주며, 주변에 高句麗 初期 段階의 積石墓 遺蹟들이 共存한다는 점 역시 그 시사하는 바가 크다고 하겠다. About 600 dolmens have been found in Liaodong area so far. Seeing the distribution pattern of the dolmens, they are mainly clustered in the southern and northern areas of Taizi River. The types of dolmens in these areas can be classified into table-type and no-leg type dolmen. The structural characteristics of the two types are similar to each other in general, but their distinctions were also identified through the relics found. That is, they are similar in terms of types and basic structure, but have clear differences in terms of the year that they were built and cultural patterns of archeology. Table-type dolmens were mostly found in the southern cluster zone of Liaodong area with a few no-leg type dolmens. Regarding the origin and the upper limit of the suspected era, there are diverse opinions. Nonetheless, it is generally understood that dolmens were built commonly in the Liaodong area-wide around the 10th century B.C. On the other hand, current research reported that some relics in the Wangtun Tomb, Purantien and they can be suspected as the 2nd period of Shuangtuozi culture, which is regarded as a relatively earlier period. Furthermore, parts of table-type dolmens were very similar to stone-pile tombs of the 3rd period of Shuangtuozi culture in terms of the structure and construction method. That is, the table-type dolmens in Liaodong area were created and developed in the close connection with the Shuangtuozi culture. It is understood that the no-leg type dolmens were built by contacting dolmen culture of the southern part of Liaodong area in the process that Machengzi Culture in the basin of Taizi River was expanding to neighboring regions in the 12th ~11th century B.C. The oldest one was found in the Tungshan relics in Fengcheng City. They had a lid stone, which is the major characteristic of dolmen. The structure of tomb chambers and the relics excavated showed the tradition of cave tombs. The dolmens in the northern cluster zone of Liaodong area vary in terms of major distribution regions and times of popularity. Table-type dolmens were distributed every part of Liaobei area but they were mainly clustered centering on Shuiren. In the basin of Hunhe River, stone-piling facilities were found in quantity at the outside of the tomb chambers. No-leg type dolmens were classified into three types according to the construction method and materials used for the chambers. No-leg type I (pit-type) dolmens are mainly distributed in the upper area of Taizi River and Shuiren River. No-leg type II (block stone-type) dolmens are distributed in the upper area of Taizi River. No-leg type Ⅲ (combination-type) dolmens are mainly distributed in the upper area of Taizi River and East Riao River. That is, the no-leg type dolmens in this region are clustered centering on Taizi River, which has difference in distribution pattern from table-type dolmens. They demonstrate local distinctions. As for the dolmens in Northern cluster zone, more accumulated stone facilities were added a lot around the tomb chambers as the era passed by. For those dolmens, the size of lid stone became smaller, regardless of the type of dolmens. There also coexisted the relics of stone-pile tombs of the early Goguryeo Kingdom in or around the same tombs, which suggested a lot of significance.
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
