Q방법론을 활용한 부동산중개업 종사자의 전문성 인식에 관한 연구

배동학(Bae, Dong Hak),김승희(Kim, Seung Hee) 한국주거환경학회 2020 주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집) Vol.18 No.4

This.study empirically analyzed the subjective concept of real estate industry workers" perception of expertise by applying the Q methodology to real estate brokerage workers. In this study, a group of experts who acquired real estate brokerage qualifications among real estate brokerage experts was used as a P sample, and all representative recognition types were AU(autonomy) , showing the position of development stage rather than skilled manpower. As a result of subjective perception analysis using the Q methodology, type 1 is classified into cooperation pursuit type, type 2 self-reliance pursuit type, type 3 or more pursuing realization type, type 4 experience pursuit type, and type 5 activity pursuit type. In this study, among real estate brokerage experts, the group of experts who received real estate broker certification was P sample, AU(autonomy) was represented as a representative recognition type in all types, and PO(professional organization: network) was appeared in most types. AU(autonomy) appears as a representative tangible characteristic, and it can be seen that the real estate brokerage business is playing a small role as an individual-centered professional broker. It also shows that it is necessary to further strengthen competitiveness by subdividing the brokerage business through PO(professional organization: network) and performing tasks related to the brokerage business. This study categorizes real estate brokerage workers" professionalism perception, identifies their characteristics, and provides them as basic data for understanding real estate brokerage workers" professionalism perceptions, providing policy implications for improving the professionalism of real estate brokerage workers. Although it is difficult to generalize the findings of the study, it is necessary to conduct a quantitative survey tailored to the professional scale with follow-up studies to identify the expertise.

Q방법론을 활용한 주거복지 종사자의 주거복지 인식 차이

배동학(Bae, Dong Hak),이한나(Lee Han Na),김승희(Kim, Seung Hee) 한국주거환경학회 2021 주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집) Vol.19 No.1

본 연구는 주거복지 종사자에게 Q 방법론을 적용하여 주거복지 종사자들의 주거복지 인식에 대한 주관적인 개념을 실증적으로 분석하였다. 주거복지 종사자의 주거복지에 대한 인식은 4개 유형으로 도출되었다. 1유형은 물리적 주거환경 개선형, 2유형은 주거복지 정책지원형, 3유형은 광의의 주거서비스 지원형, 4유형은 ‘주거권’ 보장을 위한 주거복지 실현형이다. 이러한 분류는 결국 주거복지 개념과 서비스의 범위에 대한 인식의 차이에서 도출된 것으로 보인다. 주거복지의 개념을 협의로 인식하는가(2유형), 광의로 인식하는가(4유형)에 따라 유형이 분류되었다. 또한, 주거서비스의 범위를 물리적 시설개선에 한정하는가(1유형), 주거 취약계층에 대한 상담·발굴·심리·정서적 서비스까지 포함하여 인식하는가(3유형)에 따라 분류되었다. 이는 주거복지업무 종사자의 업무에 대한 이해와 수행 정도에 따라 개인의 인식이 다르게 나타난 것으로 판단된다. 장기적인 관점에서 주거복지 업무는 주거안정과 주거수준 향상을 위한 수단임을 고려하면, 주거복지 종사자의 주거복지에 대한 인식이 넓은 의미로 확장될 필요가 있다. 주거복지 종사자는 물리적 주거서비스, 경제적 주거서비스는 포함 시키고 있으나 생활의 편리함을 유지할 수 있는 생활서비스 개념은 업무 범위에 포함 시키지 않았다. 이에 전반적인 주거복지 업무에 대한 인식의 제고가 필요하다. 또한, 인식의 차이마다 복지업무의 실천이나 문제해결이 상이 하게 나타날 수 있으므로 전문성 제고를 위한 교육 및 실천방안이 달라져야 할 것이다. This study empirically analyzed the subjective concept of residential welfare workers perception of residential welfare by applying the Q methodology to residential welfare workers. The perception of residential welfare of residential welfare workers was derived into four types. The first type is the physical housing environment improvement type, the second type is the residential welfare policy support type, the 3 type is the broader type of housing service support type, and the 4 type is the realization type of residential welfare to guarantee the right to live. This classification seems to have been derived from differences in perception of the concept of residential welfare and the scope of services. The types were classified according to whether the concept of residential welfare was recognized as a consensus (type 2) or a broad sense (type 4). In addition, it was classified according to whether the scope of residential services is limited to physical facility improvement (type 1), and whether it includes counseling, discovery, psychological, and emotional services for the vulnerable (types 3). It is judged that individuals perceptions differ depending on the degree of understanding and performance of the work of the residential welfare worker. Considering that residential welfare work is a means of improving housing stability and housing standard from a long-term perspective, it is necessary to expand the awareness of housing welfare workers in a broad sense. Residential welfare workers include physical housing services and economic housing services, but the concept of living services that can maintain the convenience of life is not included in the scope of work. Accordingly, it is necessary to raise awareness of overall residential welfare work. In addition, since the practice of welfare work or problem-solving may appear differently for each difference in perception, education and action plans for enhancing professionalism should be changed.

부동산업 종사자의 전문성 인식유형과 차이에 관한 연구

배동학(Bae, Dong hak),김승희(Kim, Seung Hee) 한국부동산학회 2020 不動産學報 Vol.82 No.-

본 연구의 목적은 부동산업 종사자의 전문성 인식유형과 인식유형에 따른 전문성 발달단계를 알아보는 데에 있다. 부동산업 종사자의 전문성 인식을 알아보기 위해서 인간의 주관성을 탐색하는데 유용한 Q방법론을 적용하였다. 이 연구에서는 총 5단계로 구성된 Q방법론의 과정을 거쳐, 부동산업 종사자의 전문성에 대한 인식을 분석하여 유형화하고 유형화된 인식의 전문성 발달단계의 위치를 알아보았다. 연구결과, 부동산업 종사자의 전문성 인식유형은 총 5유형으로 나타났다. 제1유형은 상호작용의식화형, 제2유형은 전문교육추구형, 제3유형은 집중훈련화추구형, 제4유형은 교육·네트워크추구형, 제5유형은 자율성강화추구형이다. 인식유형에 따른 전문성 발달단계는 제1유형은 초보 단계, 제2유형은 입문단계, 제3유형은 숙련단계, 제4유형은 능숙단계, 제5유형은 전문화 단계로 유추할 수 있다. 이 연구는 부동산업 종사자의 전문성인식의 유형과 유형에 따른 전문성 발달단계의 특성을 파악하여, 이를 바탕으로 부동산업 종사자의 전문성 인식을 이해하는 기초자료와 전문성 발달단계별 특성을 제공함으로써 부동산업 종사자의 전문성 향상을 위한 정책적 함의를 제시하였다. 연구결과를 일반화하기는 어렵지만 후속연구를 통해 실제 전문가 척도에 맞춘 정량적 조사를 통해 객관적 지표를 통한 전문성과 주관적 인식을 통한 전문성의 차이를 규명하는 연구가 필요하다. 1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to investigate the recognition of professionalism in real estate industry and address the development stage of professionalism according to each type of recognition. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study was examined concerning Q methodology which is useful for exploring human subjectivity. The research steps as follows. 1) sampling of Q statements through literature review, 2) selecting of Q statements through Delphi survey, 3) selecting of P samples, 4) Q sorting, 5) data processing and analysis using QUANL programs. (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS The 5 types of recognition from this study as follows. The first type is interactive consciousness type, the second type is professional knowledge pursuit type, the third type is professional training pursuit type, the fourth type is educational pursuit type, and the fifth type is network pursuit type. The development stage of professionalism according to the recognition type can be inferred as the first level for the first type, the introductory level for the second type, the proficient level for the third type, the proficiency level for the fourth type, and the specialization level for the fifth type. 2. RESULTS In this study, the recognition of the professionalism of the real estate industry was categorized by using the Q methodology exploring the subjectivity of the subject. Through the type of recognition, the factors of professionalism based on the theory of professional development were addressed. This study present the necessity of enhancing expertise based on the characteristic analysis of recognition of the professionalism of the real estate industry.