
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
일본 민사소송법상 “쟁점 및 증거정리절차”의 고찰을 통한 새로운 방향의 모색
박태신 한국민사소송법학회 2007 민사소송 Vol.11 No.1
A Civil Proceedings Act was revised preparatory proceedings with a form to carry out necessarily(It has been usually called “a new model”). In other words, to support this, the above Act is revised, and it was enforced from 2002.7.1. The procedure is very useful for solving the civil problems. But in the comparison with other legal system, it`s very strict so it can lack in versatility for problems solving. Therefore, I thought to make this article to grope for a new direction and to find versatility of a system of our country through the actual situation about an equal system of other countries.For that purpose I have written “a rearranging procedure of an issue and evidence” of Japanese legal pretrial clause. Because firstly studying the Japane- se legal trial clause, I thought to do new direction grope through a new system and comparison of our country. And secondly Koerans system is very much the same with Japanese public speaking preparatory proceedings(an issue and contents for an evidence rearranging procedure). Koerans system is the differ- ence in Japanese system. Because Korean system is accepted as very stiff as for it`s understanding.However, in charge of a duty to accomplish a function of the compulsion, the public speaking preparatory proceedings is very important by an umpire process. But it`s important to prevent administration in a public speaking fixed date of waste of trail through this procedure again, but public speaking preparatory proceedings of other forms cannot still deny that it is worse by an admi- nistration manner of a judicial officier.Therefore, I agree that it enforces a rearragnging proceduere of an issue and evidence basically, and it is necessary to change public speaking preparatory proceedings process with a form of procedure by judgment of efficiency of the judicial officier than in principle administrative compulsion for this procedure of the Civil Proceedings Act.
복수중에서의 혈청 및 복수내 Adenosine Deaminase 활성도 측정의 진단적 가치
박태군(Tae Koon Park),양은수(Eun Soo Yang),박태준(Tae Joon Park),이희승(Hee Seung Lee),류종철(Jong Cheol Ryu),신원창(Won Chang Shin),최원충(Won Chong Choi),이진호(Jin Ho Lee),김관엽(Kwan Yop Kim) 대한내과학회 1994 대한내과학회지 Vol.47 No.1
Objectives: In this study, we would like to evaluate the diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase activity in serum and ascitic fluid from patients with ascites of various causes, including tuberculous peritonitis, liver cirrhosis with or without hepatoma, and cancer peritonitis. Methods: The ADA was assessed in serum and ascitic fluid, and simultaneous calculation of ascitic fluid/ serum ADA ratios were obtained in 89 patients with ascites due to various causes; 42 for liver cirrhosis, 18 for hepatoma, 14 for tuberculous peritonitis, 15 for malignant ascites. Results: 1) Serum ADA activity was significantly higher in patients with liver cirrhosis than those with other causes of ascites, with the level of 61.3±49.0 U/L, and the corresponding ADA levels of other diseases were 42.8±20.4 U/L in hepatoma, 46.1±21.9 U/L in tuberculous peritonitis, 24.0±19.8 U/L in malignant ascites (p<0.05). 2) Ascitic fluid ADA activity was highest in patients with tuberculous peritonitis than those with non-tuber-culous causes of ascites, with the level of 82.0±72.3 U/L, and the corresponding ADA levels of other diseases were 21.1±31.7U/L in liver cirrhosis, 8.8±7.7U/L in hepatoma, 29.0±19.7 U/L in malignant ascites (p<0.05). Ascitic fluid ADA level greater than 80 U/L had a specificity of 97%, sensitivity of 50%, and diagnostic efficiency of 76% for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis. 3) The ascitic fluid/serum ADA ratios were significantly higher in patients with malignant ascites than those with other causes of ascites, with the level of 3.5±7.0, and the corresponding levels of other diseases were 0.8±1.8 in liver cirrhosis, 0.3±0.4 in hepatoma, 1.7±1.3 in tuberculous peritonitis (p<0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that the assessment of serum and ascitic fluid ADA activity, and simultaneous calculation of ascitic fluid/serum ADA ratios would be useful in the differential diagnosis between patients with tuberculous peritnnitis and non-tuberculous causes of ascites.
박태신 한국민사소송법학회 2019 민사소송 Vol.23 No.2
In the case of a civil case, the reason for the ruling is to provide basic data for the decision on whether or not to appeal the ruling to the parties, and to provide the basic data of the hearing to the superior court. It also has a meaning to guarantee the objectivity and fairness of the process of order formation for the judge who makes the judgment. Considering these points, the reason for the ruling can be regarded as an essential part of the ruling. The Civil Procedure Act stipulates in Article 208 that a reason must be given in a ruling and that the reasoning should be such as to give a judgment on the parties' claims and other methods of attacking and defending so that the order can be justified. On the other hand, Article 420 stipulates that, except in certain cases, the appeal judgment may cite the reasons for the first judgment. In addition, Article 11-2, Paragraph 3 of the Trial of Small Claims Act stipulates that the reasons for the decision do not have to be recorded in the judgment document of small civil claims. And Article 5 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Procedure for Trial by the Supreme Court stipulates that when an appellant has failed to submit a written statement of grounds for appeal to the Supreme Court within 20 days from the date of receiving the notice of the litigation record, the reasons for the ruling may not be written in the judgment and that if the Supreme Court dismisses appeal without hearing within four months from the date of receipt of litigation record, no grounds may be stated in a judgment. Among the above exceptions, both the citation of the grounds for the first trial by The Court of Appeals and omission of reason in the case of dismissal of appeal due to non-submission of appeal reason section, can not be said to be a virtually omission of reason. However, provisions that make it possible to omit a reason in a small civil claims, or a provision that allow to omit reasons in a Supreme Court case ending without hearing, must be revised.
박태인,이현엽,Park, Tae-In,Lee, Hyun-Yup 한국마린엔지니어링학회 1979 한국마린엔지니어링학회지 Vol.3 No.1
Alignment of marine engine shafting generally implies a judicious slope alignment of supporting bearings in order to achieve acceptable values of bearing reactions and shaft stresses for all deformation conditions of hull. Authors developed a computer program, which computes the bearing reaction forces, the bearing reaction influence numbers and etc, using quadruple integration method. And the results of calculation for a 26,000 DWT steam container carrier were in good agreements with those of foreign shipyard. Also they introduced the optimization technique of slope alignment combined technical economic basis, and as a result of comparing characteristics of shafting in case of straight alignment whit those in case of slope alignment, the latter was found to be much better than the former.