
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
朴庸燦 서울市立大學校 1982 論文集 Vol.16 No.-
The notion of welfare used here is more akin to broad social categories like religion, education, kinship or politics than to specific social organizations like the social services. That is to say, the significance of welfare was looked upon as a social institution. An appreciation of the comples relationship between society and social welfare policy is the major focus of this paper. Chapter Ⅲ of this article examines the two main views about the nature of society as well as of social welfare and about their inter-relationship. Chapter Ⅳ&ⅴ deal with the nature, development and consequences of social welfare policy in the context of the two main types of industrial society-capitalist and socialist. The insights gained from Chapter Ⅲ are used to explore the relation between types jof social structure and social welfare policy.
朴庸燦 서울市立大學校 1991 論文集 Vol.25 No.-
Welfare Policies are closely related and influenced by social values on which a society is built up. The current study first explores the relationship between welfare policies and efficiency-equity, and then seeks to find the view on efficiency and equity revealed in Korea's welfare policies. Without analyzing social values preferred by a specific society, it is hard to make any welfare policy effective and also hard to achieve the fundamental goals of the welfare policy. Chapter 1 explains purposed and boundaries, chapter 2 explores the relationships between social welfare policies and efficiency-equity. Most of all, this study focuses on competing social values, all of which are important in making welfare policies. Chapter 3 discusses social values-economic efficiency versus social equity-with regard to welfare policies. A literature review of the trade-offs among competing values is presented. Chapter 4 empirically analyzed the trade-offs between efficiency and equity found in a variety of Korean welfare policies, Chapter 5 summarizes the characteristics of Korean welfare policies. This study reveals that the level of welfare in Korea not anly falls behind that of developed countries but also does behind the welfare in the countries whose economic environments are similar to those in Korea. This might be a result of Korean national policies which have been putting more weights on the economic development policies than on the welfare policies. In other word, it is resulted from the fact that Korean government puts more values on economic efficiency than on social equity.
박용찬 국립국어연구원 2001 한국어 연수 교재 Vol.2001 No.-
한국은 북위 33~43°, 동경 124~132° 사이에 놓여 있으며 아시아 대륙의 북동쪽에 자리 잡고 있다. 압록강과 두만강을 경계로 중국 및 러시아와 국경을 맞대고 있으며, 대한해협을 사이에 두고 일본과 인접하고 있다. 한국의 영토는 한반도를 중심으로 그 주위에 크고 작은 섬 3,000여 개가 있다. 면적은 약 22만 1천 ㎢로 영국과 비슷하다. 산이 많아 전 국토의 3분의 2나 차지한다. 산지가 많긴 하나 높고 험한 산지는 북부 지방에 많고 중부 이남으로는 그리 험하지 않다. 한국의 지형은 북쪽과 동쪽이 높고 남쪽과 서쪽이 낮다. 이로 인해 강들은 대부분 황해와 남해로 흐르고 있다. 이들 강의 아래쪽에는 평야가 넓게 발달되어 있다. 한국의 바닷가는 동해안과 황ㆍ남해안이 많이 다르다. 동해안은 해안선이 밋밋하고 섬이 거의 없는 데 반하여, 황ㆍ남해안은 해안선이 들쑥날쑥 복잡하고 섬, 반도, 만 등이 많다.
서울시 복지전달체계의 효율화 방안 : Gilbert & Specht의 분석모형을 중심으로
朴庸燦 서울市立大學校 1997 論文集 Vol.31 No.-
This study is attempt to make an approach for the constitutions of ideal social welfare service delivery systems equipped with integrated, continuous, accessible and accountable service systems. In accordance with N. Gilbert & H. Specht's model, proposals for reform invariably accompany critical analyses of service delivey. A. Strategies to restructure authority for, and contral of, policy making coodination, citizen participation. B. Strategies to reorganize the allocation of tasks-role attachments, Professional disengagement. C. Strategies to alter the composition of the delivery system-specialized access structure, purposeive duplication. In this article, the current delivery system of social welfare service in Seoul city government is investigated and analyzed in phase of coordination, specialized access structures.
Pluralism과 Elitism의 理論的考察 : 한국에 적합한 理論的模型의 모색
朴庸燦 서울市立大學校 1985 論文集 Vol.19 No.2
The meaning of pluralism can be condensed into two phrases, that is, "the inferplay of diverse political groups" and "diffusion of power". The classical pluralist structure is a tri-level arrangement in which a congeries of voluntary associations stand between the masses and the state. Modern version of pluralism is elite-pluralism, in which the need for political elites to make societal decisions at some distance from the masses is recognized. The validity of the pluralist model is questionable on several grounds. The fundamental premise of the elite model of societal power is the prevalence of rule by the few. Classical elite theorists Pareto and Mosca explain the development of elite rule as inevitable. But radical elitists don't see elites as either inevitable or necessarily functional. The power elite is viewed as retaining its power manipulation of the masses. Despite its compelling thesis, elite theory leaves certain questions unanswered. These questions are related to elite inevitability, elite cohesiveness, elite-mass relations, and the place of the masses. In spite of these questions, elite theory remains a forceful description of political structure and behavior in modern societies. This article is designed to apply the theory of elitism and pluralism in Korean society. In conclusion, elitism may be suitable for Korean society, particulary, concept of Mills' power elite and Mosca's elite change.