한국의 과채류 재배 스마트 온실 실태: 온실 환경 및 병해충 관리

박영균,백성훈,임재성,김민중,이준호,Park, Young-gyun,Baek, Sunghoon,Im, Jae Seong,Kim, Min-Jung,Lee, Joon-Ho 한국응용곤충학회 2020 한국응용곤충학회지 Vol.59 No.1

Smart greenhouses are primarily used for growing fruits and vegetables, such as sweet peppers, tomatoes, strawberries. Although the number of smart greenhouses has been increasing exponentially, no studies have been performed to evaluate the state of smart greenhouses in Korea. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine current state of smart greenhouses with regard to greenhouse specifications, crop growing methods, pests, and user satisfaction in Korea. Contact information for smart greenhouses was provided by the officials of local agricultural research and extension services. This survey was conducted by visiting each greenhouse. Results showed that approximately 50% of surveyed smart greenhouses were between 3,300 ㎡ and 6,600 ㎡. The most frequently chosen method for pest control was chemical pesticides (97.1%). Powdery mildew and gray mold comprised 54.4% and 33.8% of the crop diseases, respectively. All tomato greenhouse farmers considered whiteflies the most problematic pest. In contrast, 76.5% and 70.6% of sweet pepper farmers believed thrips and aphids posed significant threats, respectively. The mean satisfaction score was 7.5 out of 10 points, with 10 being "extremely satisfied". These results will aid in decision making with respect to the management of current smart greenhouses and the design of future smart farms in Korea.

디지털 컨트롤러 공유 및 Pseudo Relaxation Oscillating 기법을 이용한 원-칩 다중출력 SMPS

박영균,임지훈,위재경,이용근,송인채,Park, Young-Kyun,Lim, Ji-Hoon,Wee, Jae-Kyung,Lee, Yong-Keun,Song, Inchae 대한전자공학회 2013 전자공학회논문지 Vol.50 No.9

본 논문에서는 디지털 제어부를 공유하며, 회로 동작시간의 분배 방식을 통해 다중 출력을 지원하는 SMPS를 제안한다. 제안된 회로는 Pseudo Relaxation Oscillating 기법의 DPWM 발생기를 사용한다. 제안된 SMPS는 회로의 동작시간 분배 방식을 사용하여 기존의 DPWM 발생기에서 문제가 되는 큰 면적의 디지털 로직 컨트롤러를 공유하는 형태이기 때문에 칩 면적과 효율 측면에서 큰 이점을 가지지만, 각 DPWM 발생기의 실시간 제어가 어려우며 불안정한 출력 전압을 공급할 수 있다는 단점을 가진다. 이를 해결하기 위해 본 논문에서는 동작시간 분배 방식으로 인해 동작클록이 인가되지 않은 DPWM 발생기들의 출력전압을 실시간으로 피드백 받아 안정된 출력 전압을 공급할 수 있는 실시간 전류 보정 기법을 제안한다. 제안된 SMPS를 100MHz의 내부 제어 동작 주파수와 10MHz 스위칭 주파수로 동작시킬 시, 소모되는 내부 코어 회로의 최대 전류는 4.9mA이며, 출력 버퍼를 포함한 전체 시스템의 전력 소모는 30mA이다. 또한 800mA, 100KHz의 load current regulation 조건으로 시뮬레이션 시, 3.3V 출력전압에 대한 최대 리플 전압은 11mV, Over/Undershoot voltage는 각각 10mV, 19.6mV 이다. 코어 회로의 크기는 $700{\mu}m{\times}800{\mu}m$의 작은 면적으로 구현가능하다. 제안된 회로는 Dong-bu Hitek BCD $0.35{\mu}m$ 공정을 이용한 시뮬레이션을 통해 검증되었다. This paper suggests a multi-level and multi-output SMPS based on a shared digital logic controller through independently operating in each dedicated time periods. Although the shared architecture can be devised with small area and high efficiency, it has critical drawbacks that real-time control of each DPWM generators are impossible and its output voltage can be unstable. To solve these problems, a real-time current compensation scheme is proposed as a solution. A current consumption of the core block and entire block with four driver buffers was simulated about 4.9mA and 30mA at 10MHz switching frequency and 100MHz core operating frequency. Output voltage ripple was 11 mV at 3.3V output voltage. Over/undershoot voltage was 10mV/19.6mV at 3.3V output voltage. The noise performance was simulated at 800mA and 100KHz load regulation. Core circuit can be implemented small size in $700{\mu}m{\times}800{\mu}m$ area. For the verification of proposed circuit, the simulations were carried out with Dong-bu Hitek BCD $0.35{\mu}m$ technology.

골다공증 빅데이터 수집을 위한 광학 문자 인식 기술의 적용

박영균(Youngkyun Park),방현희(Hyunhee Bang),박일형(Ilhyung Park),장국봉(Zhang Guofeng),박철우(Chulwoo Park),정상현(Sanghyun Joung),노미진(Mijin No),이현우(Hyunwoo Lee),송호섭(Hoseop Song) 대한전자공학회 2018 대한전자공학회 학술대회 Vol.2018 No.6

통일의 녹색비전과 남북의 생태도시협력

박영균 ( Park Young-kyun ) 한국철학사상연구회 2017 시대와 철학 Vol.28 No.1

This paper deals with the cooperation of eco-city between North and South within the perspective of green vision of unification. The city suppressed and dominated rural areas with modern industrialization. Moreover, today, the globalization of capital is accelerating through urbanization. Therefore, in order to overcome the dangers of modern industrialization and the globalization of capital, it is necessary to change the city itself. This is why today `urbanism` gets attention. In addition, today, the nation-state does not have the same central control as in the past and is governed by governance with local governments and citizens. Therefore, this paper suggests the necessity of eco-city formation strategy based on green urbanism, and then insists on the green cooperation between cities in North/South Korea. However, the green cooperation between cities in North/South should be based on the inherent and potential of each city. Therefore, secondly, this paper compares features of urbanization and cities of North/South and deals with the advantages of the northern cities in the cooperation of eco-city between North and South. Third, this paper presents four strategic directions for eco-city formation based on the discussion of features of global cities known as eco-cities. Next, this paper presents the historical meanings of the eco-city formation strategy and the plans of the green cooperation between cities in North/South.

한반도의 분단체제와 평화구축의 전략

박영균(Park, Young Kyun) 건국대학교 인문학연구원 2016 통일인문학 Vol.68 No.-

이 논문은 한반도의 분단이 생산하는 냉전을 극복하고 평화로 나아가기 위한 전략을 모색하고 있다. 한반도에서의 평화구축은 분단 그 자체를 양국가 내부에서 재생산하는 분단체제에 대한 해체 작업과 긴밀하게 결합되어 있다. 따라서 이 글은 백낙청의 분단체제론과 요한 갈퉁의 평화학을 접목시키고 있다. 첫째, 이 글은 백낙청의 분단체제론에 대한 재해석을 통해서 한반도의 분단에서 생산되는 ‘분단폭력’의 핵심이 분단 그 자체가 생산하는 폭력임을 밝히고 있다. 둘째, 이 글은 분단체제에 의해 생산된 폭력이 ‘두 개의 분단국가체제’와 ‘세계체제’에 의해 생산된 폭력과 결합되는 메커니즘에 대해 논의하고 있다. 셋째, 이 글은 분단폭력이 요한 갈퉁이 말하는 ‘직접적-구조적-문화적 폭력’이라는 ‘폭력의 삼각형’을 통해서 작동하며 그런 폭력의 사회문화적 배경이 ‘DMA증후군’이라는 점에서 이에 대한 해체로부터 시작되어야 한다고 주장하고 있다. 넷째, 이 글은 한반도에서의 평화구축에서 보다 시급한 것은 정치-군사적 측면에서의 평화구축이지만 보다 근본적인 것은 분단폭력을 대중적으로 재생산하고 있는 분단 트라우마와 아비투스라는 점을 밝히고 있다. 그러므로 이 글은 한반도의 평화구축은 남북 두 국가 사이에서의 평화가 아니라 오히려 갈퉁이 말하는 ‘마음의 문화적 평화’, 즉 ‘마음의 분단’을 극복하는 것에서부터 시작되어야 하며 그 시작은 ‘분단의 트라우마’를 치유하고 ‘분단의 아비투스’를 해체함으로써 ‘통일의 사회적 신체’를 만들어가는 작업이라고 주장하고 있다. This paper explores strategies for overcoming the cold war produced by the division of Korean Peninsula and moving toward peace. Peace building on the Korea is closely linked to the dismantling of the division system that reproduces the division itself within the two states. Therefore, this article combines Nak-chung Paik‘s division system theory and Johann Galtung’s peace studies. First, this paper discusses that ‘division violence’ produced by the division of Korea based on reconsideration of Nak-chung Paik‘s division system theory. Second, This paper discusses the mechanism that combines the violence produced by division system and the violence produced by ‘two divided states’ and ‘world system.’ Third, this paper argues that peace on the Korean Peninsula must begin with the dismantling of division violence, it works through the ‘triangle of violence’ that John Galtong refers to as ‘direct-structural-cultural violence’ and the social and cultural background of such violence is ‘DMA Syndrome.’ Fourth, this paper reveals that in the peace building on the Korean Peninsula, the urgent task is to build peace on the political and military side, but more fundamental is the division traumas and abitus that are massively reproducing the violence. Therefore, this paper argues that peace building on the Korean peninsula should not begin with peace between the two Koreas, but rather ‘cultural peace of mind’ as John Galtong said, by overcoming ‘division of mind’, and this beginning is the work of making ‘social body of unification’ by healing ‘trauma of division’ and dismantling ‘abitus of division.’

포스트 통일과 민족적 연대의 원칙

박영균 ( Young Kyun Park ) 한국철학사상연구회 2016 시대와 철학 Vol.27 No.1

This paper discuss the principle of national solidarity in view of post-unification. This begins with the definition of a neologism, ``post-unification.`` ``Post-unification`` is not only a mean that after unification. ``Post-unification`` focuses on the social-cultural conflict between East and West German citizens appeared after German unification. But this is not a problem to be started after the unification. Rather, it should be prepared before unification. Thus, ``post-unification`` is issued for the socio-cultural conflict as a matter of unification. Germany has promoted a exchange-cooperations between the two residents before Integration of two state. German unification is a product of this effort. In order to unify, first of all, it should start from ``differences of two state``, not nation as a ``one.`` This is one reason why a exchange-cooperations between the two Koreas should start from a ``solidarity``, not the nation as one. But ``national solidarity`` can not work without acceptance of a ``anything that exceeds`` over the general diplomatic relations. Therefore, second, ``national solidarity`` can work when not only is the two, but also both have a desire of identification. This is shown by the Germany`s < Grundlagenvertrag > and Korea`s < Inter-Korean Basic Agreement >. But the Korean Peninsula retreat into new Cold War, while the German has gone a unification. It is because of a matter which the trauma of division produces the ``politic of hate`` in the S/N Korean. Therefore third, a national solidarity of S/N Korean should develop into a solidarity of pain and suffering including a Korean separated, by changing a ``antagonistic narrative`` as a ``common narrative.``

통일의 인문적 비전 -소통으로서 통일론-

박영균 ( Young Kyun Park ) 한국철학사상연구회 2013 시대와 철학 Vol.24 No.3

In this paper, I depart from criticism that a existing theories of unification centered reunification plan has fallen into ‘state-centric view’ by doing focus a national integration and functional system integration. The state-centric view is ordering from the point of view of their own and ideally abstracting the future of a unified Korea found such values. For example, north and south Korea have proposed a value of ‘democracy’ in the unification scheme. It appears to both is share the same value. However, ‘meaning’ of ‘democracy’ proposed north and south Korea different. Therefore, it produce a hostile confrontation as reciprocally unmasking the point that false democracy of the opponent and only real their own democracy. At this point exactly, a north and south nation is need to accept the values with each other and communicate share their`s values. This paper is defined the communication as ‘to teach-learning asymmetrical relationship’. It is to create the future rule of a unified Korea unified in the communication as a teach-learning process from each other by means of enclose in parentheses the meaning of the humanities value such as ‘peace’, ‘freedom’, ‘equality’, ‘democracy’, ‘human rights’, ‘ecological’.

코리안 디아스포라의 민족공통성 연구방법론

박영균 ( Young Kyun Park ) 한국철학사상연구회 2011 시대와 철학 Vol.22 No.2

This paper attempt to explore new research methodology by establishing the new notion, ``national commonality`` because Korea`s unification would bring us not only the integration of North and South, but also it would be the process of combining experience and capacity of our nation which previously dispersed by colonization and division.` Previous research is in the opposition between nation and post-nation, identity and hybridity. In addition, a comparative research is still in one-dimensional flatness by focusing on made comparative studies with a few common questions. Moreover, the bigger problem is the point that is very little the paper on these research methodologies. As the Korean diaspora have indicated, a dual identity has been undermining the subject of identity and homogeneity in modern paradigm. On the other hand, however, the studies affected by the post-modern paradigm incline to the one-sided praise on ``post-nation``, ``hybridity``. Thus this will seek ways to a new research methodology reflecting the uniqueness of Korean diaspora beyond studies which had been dichotomically conflicted as ``states vspost-states`` or ``nation vs post-nation.`` Moreover, this propose to learn a wisdom from the Korean diaspora`s acculturation lived in the capitalist and communist camp, because unification should be future-oriented project.

통일의 민주주의적 비전과 주권의 정치적 형성 전략

박영균 ( Park Young Kyun ) 한국철학사상연구회 2018 시대와 철학 Vol.29 No.2

So far, democratic discussions of unification have tended to presuppose ‘liberal democracy’ or ‘liberal democratic basic order.’ But these discussions, unlike the original intention, are bound to repeatedly reproduce a systemic competition of the North and South under the division system. Therefore, in order to properly discuss the democratic vision of unification, it is necessary to a epistemological shift from the alternative dichotomy as ‘South or North’ to the Korean peninsula as a totality. The epistemological shift, first of all, should be removed from the point of defining a democracy as either a liberal democracy of the South or people’s democracy of the North, and then, it is only possible to find a common vision of the two, despite a difference between the South and the North. To this end, this article discusses the distinctive features of ‘democracy itself’ in comparison with other political forms, based on the democratic theories of contemporary political philosophers such as Ranciere and Laclau-Mouffe. This article firstly reveals that democracy is a Demos’s ruling, and not the singular but pluralism, so a democracy of the South and the North should be viewed from the perspective of democracy. Second, this article reveals that democracy has an idea of ‘self-ruling’ because it has an egalitarian’s equivalent logic system despite the various differences. Third, this paper argues that the construction process of a unified nation is the process of ‘subjectification’ that produces the subjects of ‘self-ruling’, and that it is to make the sovereignty of a unified nation to be constructed politically. This paper also presents the political formation strategy of sovereignty in the following two directions. One direction is a ‘differentiate strategy’ that moves towards the anarchy world as Ranciere suggests, and the other is a ‘integral strategy’ that establishes a resistance solidarity and hegemony through a articulation of discourses as Laclau-Mouffe suggest.

스피노자적 실천철학과 맑스주의 -육체와 역사유물론-

박영균 ( Young Kyun Park ) 한국철학사상연구회 2007 시대와 철학 Vol.18 No.3

The purpose of this essay is to searching for extension of Marxism`s philosophy by virtue to a comparative study between a materialism of Spinoza and Marx. The materialism of ``orthodox`` marxism settle a fundamental question of philosophy by ``material unity of the world.`` It argued that the world is composed of ``material`` and ``material`` is a basic entity. In this point, a consciousness is subordinate to a matter. A spirit is reduced to a matter. This give birth to the ``orthodox`` marxism and economic determinist. But it is a consciousness that isn`t subordinate to a matter. A unity between consciousness and matter is found out of ``physical`` that is a bodily and material. A fundamental question of philosophy is a question of mutual current. Therefore it is found out of a agency between the two. A agency of mutual current is a ``body.`` This essay seek to extension of Marxism`s philosophy by virtue to a materialism of Spinoza opening new possibility of body. But a materialism of Spinoza presuppose a parallelism and monism of being, vitalism. In a different way, the materialism of Marx isn`t naturalism. The materialism of Marx is a physical materialism that is shaped according to a social-historically pre-determined field. Marx gave attention to desire and agent determined by ``the ensemble of the social relations.`` In result, It naturally follows that the historical materialism of Marx is politics of a class struggle and antagonism. Hence ``the politics of commune`` is to establish ``the alternative hegemony of anti-capital`` against capitalist.