http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박미나,김홍준,노경진,한수진 대한이비인후과학회 부산,울산,경남 지부회 2010 임상이비인후과 Vol.21 No.2
Cholesteatoma is divided to congenital and acquired according to the origin. We recently experienced pediatric cholesteatoma which identified during third ventilation tube insertion in a 5 year-old male child, who had suffered from recurrent otitis media previously. We conducted surgery for complete cholesteatoma removal. If the pediatric cholesteatoma is congenital, it disturbes mastoid ventilation, resulting in recurrent otitis media. : if cholesteatoma occur after recurrent ventilation tube insertion, it is considered acquired cholesteatoma. We report this case with a review of literature. (J Clinical Otolaryngol 2010;21:239-244)
일측성 전농 환자에서의 청력 재활: 바하와 크로스 보청기의 이득과 선택 기준
박미나,유신영,전영명,문인석,김성헌 대한이비인후과학회 2013 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학 Vol.56 No.6
Background and Objectives There are two ways to route sound from a deaf hemifield to a functional ear: the bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) and the contralateral routing of signal hearing aid (CROS HA). BAHA uses transcranial bone conduction; on the other hand, CROS HA uses air conduction. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the benefit of these auditory rehabilitation devices objectively and subjectively, and to analyze factors that affect daily using time. Subjects and Method We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 19 patients who selected BAHA and 9 patients who selected CROS HA to undergo rehabilitation of unilateral hearing loss. Preoperative pure tone air and bone conduction thresholds, BAHA-aided thresholds and CROS HA-aided thresholds were measured. Hearing in noise test (HINT) was measured with unaided and aided in signal to noise ratio 10 (signal 75 dB HL, noise 65 dBA). Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness Questionnaire (BBSS) was evaluated for all patients to assess subjective satisfaction and also, daily device using time was investigated. Results The aided pure tone audiometry was 44.58 dB HL, 42.71 dB HL for in BAHA and CROS HA, respectively, whereas the unaided PTA was 111.29, 103.28 dB HL for BAHA and CROS HA, respectively. The aided HINT was 63.03 and 64.06%, whereas the unaided HINT was 22.13% and 37.44% for BAHA and CROS, respectively. BBSS showed more satisfactory results with BAHA and CROS HA when compared unaided in all items. Daily using time did not correlate with the degree of satisfaction, better ear hearing levels or etiology. Conclusion It was found that not only the preoperative BAHA rod test and HA trials but also the customized and detail counseling were needed for single sided deaf patients to use auditory rehabilitation devices frequently.