http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 박덕영(Deok -Young Park) (검색결과 103 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
박덕영 ( Deok Young Park ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2012 법학연구 Vol.22 No.2
The EU, which has its roots in the 1952 European Coal and Steel Community, currently has 27 Member States and extends its policy area over diverse fields, including those of agriculture, fishery and trade. In particular, the EU is expanding the scope of its Common Commercial Policy(CCP), which in turn greatly influenced the Korea-EU FTA negotiations. The EU Commission played a major role in deciding which matters fall into the scope of the CCP, and after the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force in December 1, 2009 (the Korea-EU FTA negotiations were still under way at this point), the CCP included intellectual property rights and investment in its scope. Also, as a result of the Treaty of Lisbon, the EU finally obtained legal personality status, thus the change of the FTA``s name from the FTA between Korea and EC & its Member Statesto the FTA between Korea and EU & its Member Statesduring the negotiations. Thanks to the Korea-EU FTA, trade in goods and services increased, and especially since the EU``s 10% tariff rate of automobiles is to be gradually eliminated, the Korea-EU FTA provides a golden opportunity for Korea``s industry. This process, however, inevitably brought around issues surrounding the rules of origin, and Korea introduced the approved exporterscheme requested by the EU. The Korea-EU FTA expanded trade in goods and services and strengthened protection of intellectual property rights, but environmental barriers raised for reasons of climate change and environmental protection might hinder trade in the near future. For Korea``s industry to benefit from the Korea-EU FTA, businesses should not content themselves on the tariff advantage, but should strive to overcome the ever tightening IPR protection and environmental barriers of the EU. In other words, not only should fundamental research on the EU legal system be conducted, but the animated sharing of information on the EU``s various regulations and endeavors to overcome non-tariff barriers such as environmental barriers through R&D is absolutely needed.
-
-
关于修订《汉韩大辞典》及推出网络辞典的建议 ― 对比《大汉韩辞典》,《ZON汉字辞典》等辞典予以探讨
朴德英(Park, Deok-Young),王平(Wang, Ping) 대한중국학회 2019 중국학 Vol.67 No.-
韩国《汉韩大辞典》作为韩国现行使用最普遍的韩国汉字辞典,最初由《大汉韩辞典》(1964年)修订而来,保留了古今众多的汉字词,性质与中国《汉语大词典》同。自1973初版后,该辞典几经再版,一直未再修订。鉴于《汉韩大辞典》在《大汉韩辞典》的基础上删减了一些很有价值的 汉字词,或部分词条被删除后造成种种不当,且在编撰体例上存在诸多不完善之处,诸如插图及分 词条汉语注音、汉语注义的欠缺,等等,本文认为《汉韩大辞典》应该予以修订,适当收录被删除 的有价值的汉字词,并完善编纂体例,使之更详实、更细致、更方便读者使用。同时,为克服纸质 辞典的局限性,拓展其收容量,及时更新词条,便于读者携带,有必要推出《汉韩大辞典》的网络 辞典。 As the most commonly used Chinese character dictionary in Korea, Korea s the Chinese-Korean Dictionary was originally revised from the Large Chinese-Korean Dictionary(1964) and retained Chinese characters from ancient times to around 1950. Since the initial edition of 1973, the dictionary has been reprinted several times and has not been revised. In view of the deletion of some worthwhile Chinese characters in the Chinese-Korean Dictionary on the basis of the Large Chinese-Korean Dictionary, or the inappropriate deletion of some entries, and the many imperfections in the compilation style, such as the lack of illustrations, Chinese phonetic notes and Chinese annotations, etc., this paper holds that the Chinese-Korean Dictionary should be revised and properly included and deleted. Inaddition to the valuable Chinese characters, and improve the compilation style, so that it is more detailed, more convenient for readers to use. At the same time, inorder to overcome the limitations of paper dictionary, expand its capacity, update entries in time, and make it easy for readers to carry, it is necessary to launch the Internet dictionary of the Chinese-Korean Dictionary.
-
-
박덕영(Deok-Young PARK) 국제법평론회 2020 국제법평론 Vol.0 No.57
On December 12, 2015, the COP of the UNFCCC adopted a new treaty called the Paris Agreement to combat climate change issues. As its five years anniversary approaches, the author examines the key contents of the Paris Agreement, such as common targets of the Agreement, nationally determined contributions, mitigation, adaptation, transparency, global stocktaking, etc. And then the author critically analyses Korean NDC and its attitude towards climate change issues including internationally transferred mitigation outcomes and international carbon markets, and further urges alternative way of solutions for implementing Korean NDC, that is doing our best efforts to implement Korean NDC domestically rather than using ITMOs or international carbon markets. Finally the author critically analyses Korean attitudes towards climate change negotiations in the past, and suggests more affirmative attitudes to climate change issues. Korea needs to declare that Korea is not a developing country, and should do more positive roles in climate change negotiations considering its status in international community, rather than thinking more about national interest or economic gains.
-
박덕영 ( Deok-young Park ) 한국지식재산연구원 2006 지식재산연구 Vol.1 No.1
Copyright confers exclusive rights which are vested in the copyright owner and give him the right to forbid others to exploit the work without authorization. Ideally these rights are exercised on an individual basis by agreement between the copyright owner and the individual user of the work and there are many cases in which rights continue to be exercised individually. There are, however, certain rights which are difficult if not impossible to exercise individually and in respect of which rights owners have for many years banded together to exercise rights on a collective basis. Control over the operations of collecting societies is exercised in a variety of ways. Regulatory bodies, organizations, companies which have a monopoly in the market come under scrutiny at some point. Each country has its own collecting society system and Korea is not an exception. By looking at various kinds of collecting society systems in the United Kingdom, those examples of British systems would be helpful to develop Korean collecting society systems in modern Korean Copyright Act.
-
-
-
심당 송상현 교수 정년기념 : 특집 ; FTA와 우리의 대응 : 쌀시장 개방유예 재협상 결과의 주요내용 고찰
박덕영 ( Deok Young Park ) 국제거래법학회 2006 국제거래법연구 Vol.15 No.2
According to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, all the WTO Members are to establish a fair and market-oriented agricultural trading system, and amongst others, the most important agreement was to accomplish tariffication without exceptions of the agricultural product. Some members, including Korea, however, allowed to maintain rice import restriction measures as an exception to the tariffication without exceptions. The exceptional import restriction was to stay for 10 years from the establishment of the WTO. As the expiry date approaches, Korean government decided to negotiate for the further prolongation of the rice import restrictions. As a result of the negotiation in the year 2004, Korea is once again allowed to prohibit rice importation for another 10 years. Instead, the Minimum Market Access volume would be increased from 4.4% of domestic consumption in 2005 to 7.96% in 2014. Currently the WTO DDA negotiation for further trade liberalization is going on, and Korean rice market cannot be closed forever contrary to the general trend of globalization of the world. This another 10 years, realistically, should be the last chance for restructuring Korean farming society. Korean farming society and government should think seriously when to open Korean rice market for the national interest.
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
