RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        Do Korean Firms have Changed their Financing Patterns and Capital Structures after the Asian Financial Crisis?

        류성희,임석필 한국경영교육학회 2013 경영교육연구 Vol.28 No.3

        We investigate Korean firms’ financing patterns, including debt and equity issuances and capital structure adjustment speed between 1989 and 2008. We test the most adequate capital structure theory that explains firms' actual debt ratio changing patterns for Korean firms. According to the trade-off theory, firms need to change their capital structures to maximize their values by achieving their optimal capital structures. In the pecking order theory, firms issue debt first when they need external funds. Our results show that firms have changed(or adjusted) their capital structures over a twenty year span, and they mainly use equity issuance. These results deny the pecking order theory, but support the trade-off theory. Our results, a negative association between stock return(SR) and debt ratios, indicate that high (or overvalued) stock price reduces debt ratio by either issuing overvalued stocks or increasing the magnitude of total asset. We use Frank and Goyal’s(2003) method and a dynamic partial adjustment process to test whether firms use debts for their financial needs and change their capital structures in order to close their optimal capital structures, respectively. Furthermore, we use a two-step System GMM estimator to improve the reliability of our estimated results for capital structure adjustment speeds as we use a panel data set that likely has an endogeneity problem. We also use both book and market based debt ratios as there is no clear criteria of right debt ratio for a capital structure study.

      • KCI등재

        The Critical Appraisal of Existing Comparison Methods: Bringing the Connected Histories into Chinese Stagnation Studies

        류성희 서울대학교 사회발전연구소 2019 Journal of Asian Sociology Vol.48 No.2

        This paper introduces the incorporating comparison method into Chinese stagnation studies. Comparative historical scholars of Chinese stagnation have faced methodological culs de sac because the unconditional acceptance of the comparison method has led to the tendency to overlook connected history between West and China in Chinese stagnation. The article is divided into two sections. First, by problematizing the comparison method, this article attempts to debunk long-held problems hitherto neglected in Chinese stagnation studies. I introduce three types of comparison methods that have been widely used in Chinese stagnation studies and then disclose the common drawback of the comparisonoriented approach. Second, as an alternative, I provide the incorporating comparison method to deal with the globalized connected histories in Chinese stagnation. This approach keeps the strong points of comparison methods by transforming the problems with them into advantages.

      • Debt policies for Korean SMEs after the US financial crisis in 2007

        류성희,임석필 한국경영교육학회 2018 한국경영교육학회 학술발표대회논문집 Vol.2018 No.11

        We study the small and medium sized enterprises’(hereinafter, SMEs) financial policy in Korea. We focus on which capital structure theory SMEs mainly follow between the pecking order and the tradeoff theories. SMEs’ have different financial policy compared with big ones, as SMEs have different characteristics. Using the methods of Berger and Udell(2002), Sogorb-Mira(2005) and Shyam-Sunder and Myers(1999), we test the pecking order and tradeoff theories; we find that financial deficits(FD) have a negative association with total debt and short-term debt changes(△TD, △SD) but a positive association with long-term debt change(△LD). Thus, with having these mixed results, we cannot fully support the pecking order theory. In addition, we do not find the evidence that firms adjust their capital structures, for all △TD, △SD and △LD when using the coefficients of three different types of leverage deficits(DFT). However, using dynamic model, we fine the evidence of that SMEs ajust their debt level toward targets. Having these two contradictable results, we cannot affirmingly approve the tradeoff theory either. However, as mentioned before, our data show that firms continuously reduce their debt levels, during our sample period; this is strong evidence of approval of tradeoff theory. In addition, our study likewise shows that Korean SMEs use more SD than LD. As firms hold SD and LD with different reasons, this higher SD level is important to remember to interpret regression results, specially during our sample period in which SMEs try to recover from the financial crisis caused by U.S housing bubble.

      • KCI등재

        Corporate Governance Structure and Debt Levels: Using Korean Firms

        류성희 대한경영학회 2015 大韓經營學會誌 Vol.28 No.11

        Since Asian Financial Crisis in 1997, the idea of corporate governance structure has been an important matter in Korea. Having a good governance structure can reduce agency costs and increase firm value. In this paper, we investigate the influence of corporate governance structure on firms’ debt ratios, using three different governance proxies, the portion of stocks held by the largest shareholders and their family members (PLS), the portion of an outside director over total board member (POD), and the portions of stocks held by foreigner (PFO). This paper includes capital structure adjustment behaviours as well as the relationship between debt level and governance structure, in line with three different governance structure proxies. In addition, as there is a high probability of existing endogeneity problem in our residual as using panel data, we avoid to use an OLS estimator but use estimators that require instrument variables. We find that PLS and POD do not show a clear association with debt levels, and many of the coefficients of them are not statistically significant. However, PFO shows a clear negative association with debt levels over estimators. We also find that high levels of governance proxies cause firms to adjust their debt levels faster: That is to say that, when the largest shareholders, independent directors or foreign investors have enough power to influence a firms’ debt level decision procedure, they do use this power. Particularly, we also find that high level of PLS has the strongest effect upon firms’ debt level shifts. With this result, we suggest the importance of strong managerial-ownership. Therefore, our results suggest that PFO has the clearest negative relationship with debt levels: and high level of PLS has the strongest impact on firms’ debt level adjustment decisions. Above all, our results suggest that although PLS and POD do not show us a clear association with debt levels, they all have influence on firms’ debt level decision policies in some way. Last, but not least, we likewise find that there are stronger relationships between debt level and controlled variables than the relationship between debt level and corporate governance proxies, across our models. This implies that although corporate governance is important and takes some roles when firms decide their debt levels, it is less important compared with firms’ other capital structure determinants.

      • KCI등재

        Sorry, But G. Arrighi Is Not Almighty: Why Did He Fail to Explain China’s Process of Incorporation into the Capitalist World-Economy?

        류성희 서울대학교 사회발전연구소 2020 Journal of Asian Sociology Vol.49 No.2

        As contemporary China’s notable economic growth became one of the most popular research themes in the field of social science, China’s long-term historical path prior to the twentieth century continued to stimulate the curiosity of world-systems researchers. Among world-systems researchers, G. Arrighi is the most interested in China’s long-term and unique economic development. By providing us with theoretical conceptions of ‘industrious revolution,’ ‘trade network of East Asian region,’ and ‘business network of the overseas Chinese,’ he has tried to reveal the origins and dynamics of Chinese mode of production and link the glorious past of China (pre-nineteenth century China) and present glory of China (post-late twentieth century). Despite the original contributions to shedding a new light on the historical capitalism of China, Arrighi’s theory was still in a quandary. First, Arrighi fails to present detailed explanations of how China was incorporated into the capitalist world-economy since at least the nineteenth century, how the unique Chinese economic system (non-capitalist system) had been mixed with the European worldeconomy (capitalist system). Second, while equating Chinese economic cycle and the economic cycle of East Asian region and focusing on common grounds among East Asian countries, Arrighi could not explain of how each of East Asian countries have different politico-economic path during and after its own incorporation process. Last, he did not present compelling reasons of why the 500-years East Asian network is exceptional as compared to previously flourishing East Asian trade network. To make a good use of Arrighi’s intellectual legacy, I argue that it is the time to turn our attention to China’s incorporation process.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼