http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
노상헌 한국비교노동법학회 2010 노동법논총 Vol.19 No.-
Following up to the logic of the market for achieving competitive power, a capital movement is stimulated and it makes a labor movement ordinary. According to the figures from UN, it is assumed there are 175 million migrant workers around the world (50million in Asia) and the number of countries emigrant or immigrant them. With this circumstance, here comes a summarization of the laws for the migrant workers. Although Japan doesn’t change their stance to migrant the labors for the unskilled work, it is a fact that they accept migrant workers by indirect way for the field with insufficient labor force. There are a number of migrant workers in the field generally called 3D and almost all of them are illegal workers. They didn’t find a solution for illegal immigrant and work. Due to the fact that Taiwan has the legal migrant workers supply system, there are not so many illegal migrant for the work. However, it is a problem that there is a commission for the process. The migrant workers are under their labor law as a worker and it means they could be treated same as native workers. Singapore and Malaysia treats guest workers differently from their nationality and type of occupation. They treat specialized technician equally and induce a settlement. On the other hand, Singapore is very strict management system for unskilled workers. Our system in Korea is very similar with Japan’s in terms of the category, but there is a difference we run working permit system for migrant worker and in spite of it, there are many illegal migrant workers. It is because of the economy scale, the type and the effect of labor law system and the structure of the labor market. There might be no dissent of the basic principle for the labor law and it should be applied to the migrant workers after they get into our own labor market.
노상헌 한국사회법학회 2021 社會法硏究 Vol.- No.44
근로자의 쉴 권리를 규정한 근로기준법상 연차휴가에 대하여 대법원은 계속근로 1년 다음 발생하고, 근속연수를 가산하여 산정되므로 보상적 성격으로 이해한 다. 휴가의 보장 확대는 시대적 요청이라는 점에서 휴식권 보장적 성격으로 이해 하고 강조되어야 한다. 개선방안으로 연차휴가를 포함한 휴가제도를 단일법으로 제정하여 법적 완결성 을 갖출 것을 제안하였다. 현행 근로기준법 제60조의 연차 유급휴가 규정은 개정 을 거듭하면서 조항 수가 늘어나고, 다양한 내용을 1개의 조문으로 구성하고 있 다. 무엇보다 연차휴가규정이 근로기준법 제4장 근로시간과 휴식의 장에서 규정 되고 있어 법체계 및 해석상 오해의 소지가 있다는 문제의식이다. 즉 연차휴가를 근로시간의 장에서 편제하여 연차휴가는 근로에 대한 보상적 성격을 가진다는 종 속적 구성을 개선하여야 한다는 것이다. 휴가에 관한 단일법 제정이나 근로기준법에서 별도 ‘휴가의 장’에서 편제하는 방식으로 개선하면서, 새롭게 제정되거나 휴가의 장으로 편제할 때, 연차휴가의 보장적 성격을 명시하고 연차휴가의 출근율 요건을 폐지하기 위한 휴가법제 입법 논의가 활발하게 이루어지길 기대한다. The Supreme Court understands that statutory annual leave regulating the dormancy right of the worker is accrued after a year of continuous employment and is calculated by adding the length of service, so it is understood as a compensation. It is considered that it should be understood and emphasized as a guarantee of the right to rest that it is a period request to extend leave. It was proposed to establish a leave system including annual leave as a single law to ensure legal completeness for improvement. The number of annual leave provisions in Article 60 of the current Labor Standards Act has increased as revised repeatedly, and various contents are composed of one article. First of all, there is a sense that the annual leave regulations are stipulated in Chapter 4 Work Hours And Recess of the Labor Standards Act, which may cause misunderstandings in the legal system and interpretation. In other words, it is necessary to reform the subordinate composition that annual leave has a compensatory feature for work by compiled from the Chapter Work Hours. It will be improved by enacting a single law on leave or organizing it in a separate ‘Chapter Recess’ in the Labor Standards Act. When newly enacted or compiled as Chapter Recess, it is specified to ensure the annual leave and the attendance rate requirement for annual leave is abolished. It is expected that the legislative discussion on the leave laws will be actively conducted.