http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김홍식 대한치과기공학회 2014 대한치과기공학회지 Vol.36 No.3
Purpose: This study aims to examine correlation between temporomandibular disorder and oral habits that have been known to cause temporomandibular disorder with both male and female undergraduates. Methods: To figure out correlation between temporomandibular disorder and oral habits, a survey was conducted to 500 students of two universities located in Daegu Metropolitan City and Gyeongsangbuk-do, and excluding the ones unreliably answered or indicating errors, total 427 (85.4%) out of 500 questionnaire sheets were used for final analysis. Results: Female students showed higher prevalence rates than male students in temporomandibular joint pain and temporomandibular joint clicking, and students having the lip biting habit, tongue thrust habit, or bruxism habit indicated a higher prevalence rate of temporomandibular joint pain than normal students. Also, students having the tongue thrust habit indicated a significantly higher prevalence rate of temporomandibular joint clicking than normal students not having it. And about trismus, students having the bruxism habit showed a significantly higher prevalence rate than normal students not having it. Conclusion: The findings imply that oral habits like lip biting, tongue thrust, or bruxism are closely related with temporomandibular joint pain, tongue thrust influences temporomandibular joint clicking, and bruxism does affect trismus.
김홍식 한국체육철학회 2013 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.21 No.1
이 논문은 1990년 Quest지 42호에 집중 게재된 뉴엘(Newell, K.M.)의 “키네지올로지”(kinesiology)론과 그에 대한 스피르두소(Spirduso, W.W.), 크레츠머(Kretchmar, R.S.), 시덴톱(Siedentop, D.)의 비평 그리고 AKA, NAK에서 발표한 자료를 바탕으로 하여 1990년대 전후부터 최근까지 미국 체육 관련 학계에서 전개된 학문, 학과 명칭 변경을 중심으로 하는 (대학)학문성과 직무(전문)성에 관한 논쟁의 향배와 시사를 고찰하고자 하였다. 뉴엘의 “키네지올로지”론은 미국 체육 관련 학회, 학과의 혼돈을 통합하고자 하는 시도로서 후속의 지지 속에서 AKA, NAK와 같이 학문, 학과 명칭의 변경 및 통합으로 이어졌다. 동시에 크레츠머와 시덴톱의 비평처럼 인문학․사회과학적 접근의 입지 약화, 대학 교육과정 내 체육교육을 중심으로 하는 직무 관련 교과목의 위상 하락 등의 우려 및 반대가 함께했다. 키네지올로지에 관한 학문성과 직무성 논쟁은, 우리 체육학과 미국 키네지올로지 간의 연구 주제 및 범위, 명칭 표기 등에 관한 비교 검토가 필요하며, 체육학이라는 통일된 명칭에 안주하고 있는 우리에게 체육교육 이외에 유력하고 안정된 새로운 직무분야의 개발과 정착을 위한 협동의 노력이 절실함을 시사한다. Newell's papers on the possibilities of kinesiology to reunify the disciplinary areas and departments with higher education, and Spirduso's, Kretchmar's, and Siedentop's commentaries to Newell's arguments triggered wide discussions from 1990s to 2000s in the USA. As the result, AKA was founded, NAK was renamed, and many university and college departments changed their titles to kinesiology. This movement made the backgrounds to this study which aim was to investigate debates about kinesiology, and its implications to research and practice in Korea. The result of this study was as follows; firstly, it is needed that comparative study of focus, boundary, and titles between kinesiology and Cheayukhak(i.e. studies for physical education and sport, or human movement science), secondly, Korean researchers and educators in higher education has to develop corporately new professions related to physical activity, especially, health, and exercise. University and college departments of Cheayukhak have similar titles and programs but limited boundary of practices. They did not try eagerly to develop new professions of physical activity except physical education and sport instruction.
김홍식 대한의사협회 2019 대한의사협회지 Vol.62 No.8
The Korean Medical Association (KMA) operates two organizations dedicated to healthcare policy research: the Research Institute for Healthcare Policy, which was launched in 2002, and the KMA Policy Special Committee, which was launched in 2017 as an administrative subunit of the board of representatives. Some members of the KMA have criticized the coexistence of two organizations for policy development. They argue that it would be preferable to unify these organizations, pointing out that having duplicate organizations for policy development wastes financial resources, disperses professionals, and produces different opinions on policies, which could be a source of confusion in the policy activities of the KMA. The author was a director in charge of policy at the KMA in 2002, when the Research Institute for Healthcare Policy was founded, and has also been an active member of the KMA Policy Special Committee since its launch in 2017. Having been involved in both policy development organizations, the author suggests that unifying these two organizations would not be desirable for the medical profession. The Research Institute for Healthcare Policy and the KMA Policy Special Committee are similar in that they deal with healthcare policy, but their approaches are quite distinct. The former organization must thoroughly research healthcare policy from a theoretical perspective, while the latter approaches healthcare policy by advocating for the interests of the members of the KMA. For instance, if the two organizations simultaneously research the possibility of a global budget payment system, the Research Institute for Healthcare Policy should address both its advantages and disadvantages, while the KMA Policy Special Committee would instead organize a policy initiative opposing a global budget payment system by focusing on its disadvantage of restricting the autonomy of healthcare providers. However, if the former organization provides a theoretical base and the latter organization coordinates policy advocacy in the interest of members of the KMA, the two organizations will make a major contribution to improving the medical environment in a complementary manner. In 2018, the two organizations jointly held a workshop with the theme of “shared growth”in Cheonan, demonstrating their ongoing efforts to collaborate. The author suggests that instead of becoming enmeshed in controversies about whether it should continue to exist as a separate organization, the KMA Policy Special Committee should instead focus on becoming the KMA’s center for healthcare policy advocacy as soon as possible.