RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 전시물의 변색 예측을 이용한 박물관 조명기준의 작성

        김홍범,김훈,권세혁,Kim, Hong-Bum,Kim, Hoon,Kwon, Sae-Hyuk 한국조명전기설비학회 1996 조명.전기설비 Vol.10 No.6

        박물관에서는 조명에 의한 전시물의 손상을 최소화하고 관객의 인식의 편의성을 증진시키기 위하여 적절한 조명 기준이 요구된다. 기준의 작성을 위하여 각국의 박물관 조명 기준을 분석하였다. 우리나라 고유의 유물에 대한 변색 특성을 측정한 결과를 이용하여, 각종 광원에 의해 눈에 뜨이는 변색이 일어나는 적산조도를 계산하고 ISO등급에 따른 분류에 수행하였다. 조명기준을 만드는 데에 필요한 여러 가지 고려 사항과 이 사항들에 대하여 결정을 내리는 과정을 서술하였다. 최종적으로 국내의 박물관에 적용할 수 있는 조명기준을 제시하였다. An appropriate lighting standard for the museum is needed to minimize the deterioration of the exhibits by the light and to increase the ease of perception of visitors. To make the standard, museum lighting recommendations of several countries were analyzed. Using measured color change characteristics of Korean traditional artifacts, illuminance-hours for the artifacts with noticeable color change were calculated for various light sources, and the artifacts were classified into ISO levels. Considerations for making lighting standard and the proceedings to make a decision for the considerations were described. Finally, lighting standard which can be applicable to Korean museum was presented.

      • 박물관의 조명환경 계획에 대한 소고

        김홍범,Kim, Hong-Bum 국립문화재연구소 1995 保存科學硏究 Vol.16 No.-

        In this paper the fundamental elements relevant to schematic daylighting design for museum are discussed and suggested. The illuminance difference between outdoor and exhibition space in consideration of the constraints necessary for the conservation of artifacts can be solved by conversion into Luminance. Also it is considered that transition zone in two stages should be provided for adaption before entering exhibition space and overall luminance within the visual field along viewing circulation should be balanced including the apertures designed for introducing the daylight or visual linking.

      • 진열장 조명의 이론적 기준과 시설에 대한 고찰

        김홍범,Kim, Hong-Bum 국립문화재연구소 1996 保存科學硏究 Vol.17 No.-

        There have been many studies and experiments regarding exhibition lighting. Many experiments on photochemical damaging effect and visibility resulted in a practice limited to assigning light levels and adjusting annual exposure time. The three damaging factors to the artifacts are intrinsicsusceptibility to absorb radiant energy, spectral distribution of light source and intensity of illumination and time of exposure. Dividing all the artfacts into three categories to suggest a recommended illuminance level causes some problems. Blue wool, for example, used as the reference material for susceptibility, is not a standard material representing museum artifacts. In the most light sensitive category, ISO class I or anything below have been excluded. The exposure time of one soure can be three times more than another sourece. The spectral distribution of the light source and the relative spectral responsibility of the artifact are not considered in the practice. So in case of very light sensitive material, the recommended illuminance is only the referring value and it is indispensable to check the characteristic of susceptibility of each artifacts. Daylighting is prevailing method to solve the psychological need of the visitors. However, it sould transparent, and should not diffused, and the green-house effect must be considered. llluminance uniformity should based on the maximum illuminance to handle the limitation of exposure for the conservation of a large sensitive object such as a painting. Damage index is not absolute reference for selecting the lighting source because it is experimented from the paper of low grade then calculated. Visibility should be increased by reducing the visual noiseand by planning of appropriate luminance contrast. This paper reviews the problems with the previous studies and experiment sand the current exhibition lighting design practice. The plan for museum showcase lighting is to check the susceptibility and to raise the visibility simultaneously.

      • KCI등재

        한국의 거시건전성정책체계 설계: 2-단계 최소접근법

        김홍범 ( Hong-bum Kim ) 한국금융학회 2016 금융연구 Vol.30 No.4

        이 글은 우리나라의 현실에 적합한 거시건전성정책체계의 설계를 목적으로 한다. 제Ⅱ장에서는 일국의 거시건전성정책을 전담하기에 적합한 당국, 또는 적어도 동 정책에서 주된 역할을 맡기에 적합한 당국이 다름 아닌 중앙은행이라는 관련 문헌의 표준적 결론을 조명한다. 또한, 거시 건전성정책의 주체가 중앙은행인지 여부를 포함한 몇몇 특징적 측면에서 서로 차별화되는 여러 이론 모형에 대해서도 살펴본다. 이와 같은 일반적 논의를 토대로, 제Ⅲ장은 우리나라의 구체적 현실을 십분 고려한 2-단계 최소접근법에 따라 법정 2자 협의체(가칭 `거시건전성정책협의회`)를 한국의 거시건전성정책체계 모형(안)으로 제시한다. 동 협의회는 거시건전성정책의 두 핵심 당국으로 널리 간주되는 중앙은행(한국은행)과 금융감독당국(금융위원회·금융감독원)으로 구성된다(최소 접근). 이는 정책당국 사이에 “수직적 기관 위계(vertical institutional hierarchy)”가 지배하는 우리 사회의 유교문화적 전통을 감안하여 정부(기획재정부)를 배제함으로써, 한국은행과 감독당국 간 “기능적 협력과 수평적 견제”를 촉진하기 위한 것이다. 또한, 동 협의체는 준비단계를 거쳐 완성 단계로 진입하는 점진적 접근을 따른다(2-단계 접근). 한국은행이 “대응의지” 및 “대응역량”을 배양할 수 있으려면, 그리고 두 정책당국이 상호 협력 및 조정의 경험을 통해 선의의 경쟁 속에 각기 나름의 성과를 축적할 수 있으려면 준비 단계가 반드시 필요하기 때문이다. 제Ⅳ장은 결론으로 2자 협의체 모형의 잠재적 강점 및 한계를 논의한다. The formal institutional framework for macroprudential policy is yet to be created in Korea. Although Korea has been operating for years a couple of informal channels for discussion of major themes in its macroeconomy and finance including macroprudential policy issues relating to systemic risk and financial stability, recent evidence shows that they cannot be relied upon at all to serve the role of the macroprudential policy authorities. This stands in s contrast to the fact that many countries each have already been formally operating their own institutional arrangements for macroprudential policy, on the heels of the global financial crisis. This paper aims at designing the Korean institutional framework for macroprudential policy that should meet the basic requirements for the effective conduct of macroprudential policy and, at the same time, be adequately attuned to the institutional realities in Korea. In order to do so, Section II provides a literature review, which leads us to the finding that central banks are generally expected either to be charged with macroprudential policy as the competent authority or to play at least an important role therein. The emphasis given to the role of central banks reflects the general understanding that the effective conduct of macroprudential policy requires “a strong institutional framework” that should be built on both the “willingness to act” and the “ability to act.” Further, several typologies of stylized theoretic models found in the literature are briefly reviewed and discussed. On the basis of this literature review and in full consideration of institutional realities in Korea, Section III of the paper comes up with a two-step minimalist approach in its exploration of an appropriate model that should suit Korea properly and effectively. As a result, the paper finds one in the two-party council, tentatively titled the Macroprudential Policy Council (MaPC), in which participate the Bank of Korea (BOK) as the cental bank on one hand, and both the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) as the prudential regulator on the other. Note that in line with the paper`s minimalist approach MaPC consists of the two core authorities including BOK and FSC/FSS, with the Ministry of Finance and Strategy (MOSF) excluded. This feature is embedded in the model in view of the deep-rooted Confucianist cultural tradition in Korea where “the vertical institutional hierarchy” has long been entrenched. As long as the macroprudential policy framework is mandated to deal with the prevention side of crisis only, the two parties will suffice. In addition, this minimalist approach will contribute to mitigating effectively such inherent tendencies as “group-think” to which multi-agency councils are deemed vulnerable. The two-party council may well have considerable significance in the sense that it can be interpreted to be a natural arrangement resulting from the process of institutional evolution, as was evidenced in case of the Council for Cooperation on Macroprudential Policy that existed, though briefly, in Sweden for a couple of years back in 2012 and 2013. Note also that in line with the paper`s two-step approach MaPC is designed to take its first step to the beginning stage which allows each participant to buy enough time to get adjusted and prepared before taking its second step to move on to the completion stage. This feature importantly reflects the fact that BOK currently leaves much to be improved in terms of its willingness and ability to act, whereas FSC, along with the FSS, needs to learn how to cooperate and coordinate with BOK in macroprudential policy. In the first stage, BOK is left with few policy tools of its own to be used distinctively for the macroprudential policy purposes, while FSC/FSS, in their capacity of microprudential policy authorities, own and control most macroprudential tools. In the second stage, however, a few cyclical macroprudential tools could be assigned to BOK, which is generally expected to hold comparative advantage in analyzing and dealing with, if anything, the cyclical dimension of systemic risk. What is particularly unique about MaPC lies in a couple of specific rules that govern its modus operandi. The Council is supposed to apply either the `consultation` rule or the `positive endorsement` rule, depending on whether a proposed item on the agenda one party submits to MaPC for discussion is to request, via consultation, the other to act, or to seek positive endorsement from the other so as to carry out one`s own plan to act. Once it is either consulted or positively endorsed as the case may be, the submission will have become a recommendation issued in public by the Council with its addressee being obliged to `comply or explain`. Considering that most policy tools are in the hands of the financial supervisory authorities, these specific rules governing MaPC are contrived mainly for the purpose of ensuring BOK to exert checks and balances effectively upon FSC/FSS. Finally provided in Section IV are conclusive remarks on potential merits and limits of the institutional framework which this paper has proposed.

      • 위탁경영이 호텔의 경영성과요인에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

        김홍범(Hong Bum Kim),이경하(Kyong Ha Lee),정광석(Kwang Suk Jung) 한국호텔외식관광경영학회 2001 호텔경영학연구 Vol.10 No.1

        The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of the hotels under management contracts in terms of profitability, and by surveying experts, to know the effects such management contracts have on the hotel management. thereby to seek ways to improve the management contracts. For the study, a survey was conducted with 128 experts in different job fields and positions in eight super deluxe hotels located in Seoul, all of which are now under a management contract. The questionnaires collected were analyzed by using the frequency test, Kruskal-Wallis Test. Mann-Whitney Test and multiple regression analysis. A conclusion drawn from the survey analysis is that each hotel has benefited from the management contract, in getting on the right track and establishing itself in the business. Another conclusion is that in Korea asset value of the hotel brand is the most influential factor in a management contract. Meanwhile, in employees` perceptions of the management contract, majority of employees were found in favor of the renewal of the management contract. Therefore, a renewal of contracts should be negotiated on terms more favorable to hotels, such as limiting assistance only to most needed areas.

      • KCI우수등재

        온라인 준거집단이 여행상품 구매결정속성에 미치는 영향

        김홍범 ( Hong Bum Kim ),류미애 ( Mi Ae Ryu ) 한국관광학회 2010 관광학연구 Vol.34 No.5

        The growth of the internet has caused the conventional reference group of consumers to expand its boundary to the cyber space of internet. This study investigated the effect of online reference group of internet consumers on the customers` tour package purchasing behavior. It also examined how such effects may vary according to the travel motives of the consumers. Data were collected from 217 participants of three exhibitions, which were held in KOEX, Seoul on October 2008. Results showed that information from all the two different types of on line reference groups made signifiant impacts on respondents` decision to purchase a tour package. Results also illustrated that travel motives of the respondents made different effects on decision criteria of purchasing a tour package. Several practical implications and limitations of this study were also discussed.

      • KCI등재

        위기 이후 금융개혁: 영국,독일,호주의 경험과 시사점

        김홍범 ( Hong Bum Kim ) 한국금융학회 2015 금융연구 Vol.29 No.4

        지난 2012년 말 대선 전·후로 약 1년(2012. 6~2013. 6) 동안 전개되었던 우리나라의 금융감독체계개편론은 실제 개편으로 이어지지 못했다. 저자는 당시 개편 논의에서 첫째, 소비자보호 강화를 위해 현행 통합모형을 버리고 쌍봉모형을 채택해야 한다는 시각에 처음부터 사회적·정치적 이목이 집중되면서 이후 논의가 내내 ‘모형 선택의 함정’에 빠진 점과, 둘째, 2013년 2월 현 정부출범 이후 금융위원회가 개편 논의를 주도하는 과정에서 이해관계자들과의 소통이 거의 이루어지지 않은 점에 주목한다. 이 글은 영국과 독일의 최근 금융개혁 사례를 통해 특정 감독모형의 선택은 소비자보호와는 직접적 관련성이 없음을 확인한다. 또한 호주가 최근 추진 중인 금융개혁에서는 정부에 의해 임명된 순수 민간위원회가 처음부터 이해관계자들과의 개방적이고 투명한 협의과정을 거쳐 개혁안을 마련함으로써 그 이후 전개될 개혁 이행단계의 성공 확률을 크게 높였음을 확인한다. 이들 외국 사례는 한국의 금융개혁 추진에 중요한 함의를 갖는다. The policy debate on reforming the financial supervisory system that began in June 2012, was unintendedly caught from the outset in ‘the trap of choosing a right model of financial supervision’, which led to the blurring of the entire focus of the debate that evolved for about a year since. There, the twin-peak model came into the limelight, being supported by many critics of the existing integrated model as one that would certainly help enhance financial consumer protection. Later in Spring 2013, the Park Administration (Financial Services Commission) that took the lead in the debate by setting up and operating the Task Force for Reforming the Financial Supervisory System, used the top-down approach to the issue and drew up its own proposal for reform, with little or no conscientious efforts made to consult publicly with stakeholders. This paper first examines the recent domestic financial reform experiences of the United Kingdom and of Germany, demonstrating that consumer protection does not directly depend on choosing a particular type of model of financial supervision. Note that the United Kingdom has newly adopted post-crisis a twin-peak model, with the extant integrated model abolished, and that the Germany’s current integrated model has survived post-crisis domestic financial reforms. Based on the recent experiences of the United Kingdom and of Germany, the paper has arrived at several findings as follows. First, recent financial supervisory reforms in the UK and in Germany focused not on which specific financial supervisory model to choose but on how to reallocate powers of financial supervision among the agencies concerned. That is, the United Kingdom’s discontinuance and Germany’s continuance with the use of the integrated model, have been the mere outcomes that accompanied respective countries’ decisions regarding reallocating financial supervisory powers among the agencies concerned. Second, the institutional structure of a financial consumer protection regime entrenched seems to have little to do with a specific type of financial supervisory model in use. This is the case with both the UK and Germany. Third, financial consumer protection has been enhanced again in both countries, not by the choice of a specific type of financial supervisory model but by the improvement in policy substance. The paper next looks at what the Murray Inquiry appointed by the Australian government has recently done during the 11-month period of its activities to make its own recommendations for financial reforms, arriving at the finding that the Inquiry’s activities themselves have represented its genuine efforts to consult with stakeholders and the public in an open, transparent, and independent manner, to resolve differences in views, and possibly to come, as closer as possible, to social consensus. Such “a consultative approach” to financial reforms which the Murray Inquiry, being an ad-hoc expert committee equipped with good governance, took from the beginning in the design phase of financial reforms, may well have raised greatly the chances of success in the implementation phase to come. It is particularly worthy to note that the Murray Inquiry was supposed to work in ways that bear the closest resemblance to the world-renowned Wallis Inquiry of the mid-1990s. The Wallis Inquiry operated for a prescribed period of eleven months, producing the interim report and the final one, right in the middle and at the end of the period, respectively. Further, the Wallis Inquiry made most use of two rounds of submissions from stakeholders and the public for information purposes, opening the first round soon after the beginning of its operation and the second round right after the delivery of the interim report. These submissions, together with numerous meetings the Inquiry members had with a variety of stakeholders, domestic or abroad, were in effect the primary source of information that was used to shape up the Inquiry’s interim and final reports. Exactly these and other features of the Wallis Inquiry have been purposely built into the Murray Inquiry from the beginning by the Treasurer of the Australian Government. Needless to add, the Murray Inquiry has been equipped with such good governance as the Wallis Inquiry was able to enjoy. The paper has probed into the post-crisis financial reform experiences in the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia, revealing that the most recent policy debate on reforming the financial supervisory system in Korea has left a couple of things to be desired, as stated at the outset. This finding has straightforward implications to full-fledged financial reforms that still remain long overdue in Korea.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        패밀리 레스토랑의 브랜드 이미지와 자산가치 제고방안에 관한 연구

        김홍범(Hong Bum Kim),이상미(Sang Mi Lee) 한국호텔관광학회 2000 호텔관광연구 Vol.2 No.2

        The purpose of this study are to find out what`s the most important factors to be considered when the customer select the family restaurant and to suggest the marketing strategies for increasing the brand equity through general characteristics of family restaurants and demographic method The findings are as follows: the first, quality of the food, excellent service and atmosphere which give impacts in the brand image are very vital for selecting restaurant. The second, easy to remember for the restaurant`s brand name is showed very important factor in the brand equity analysis. The third, excellent service of the service staffs and promotion had much relationship with quality of the food and advertising in the family restaurant. In other word, accumulation of brand equity will be accomplish through service staffs who could change intangible asset to tangible asset, and continuous advertisement. The fourth, awareness, quality of the food and loyalty which are heavy factors to increase the brand equity, should be maintained through the marketing and consumer -oriented vision. The last, especially brand association and advertisement among the brand equities have much effect on the revisit in the restaurant. So marketers of the food service industries make them deeply indwell in the consumer`s mind with using direct and indirect marketing positioning tools.

      • KCI등재후보

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼