http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김인수(Lin Su Kim) (검색결과 11 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
김인수(Lin Su Kim) 한국경영학회 2000 經營學硏究 Vol.29 No.3
Management research activities in Korea have drastically increased in the past three decades. Over 4,000 articles have appeared in journals published by management related academic societies. These articles have, however, made little contributions to developing management theories that may be compatible with the economic and cultural environment in Korea for two reasons. First, in view of the theory-development process, there is a serious mismatch between the kind of theories Korea needs at this point in time and research methodologies used by most researchers. The majority of the articles introduce either existing Western theories or test hypotheses deducted therefrom without taking into account of local idiosyncrasies. The accumulation of inductive theory-generating, descriptive research must precede deductive theory-testing research. Without the former, the accumulation of the latter will lead to nowhere. Such a problem stemmed largely from skewed training in most American universities. Even seasoned American scholars deplore the unproductive nature of the analytical research tradition. Second, despite drastic increase in research outputs, few have produced critical review papers that integrate existing theories and research methodologies and, in turn, present new research directions. Management research in Korea requires a major directional change in the future.
-
김인수(Lin Su Kim) 한국경영학회 1995 經營學硏究 Vol.24 No.1
International competitiveness has largely been discussed at the macroeconomic level, The development of an economy is, however, the summation of productions undertaken by individual enterprises and its international competitiveness reflects the competitiveness of individual firms, signifying the importance of firm-level analysis. Thus, this article examines the Korea`s competitiveness from an organization theory perspective, particularly from theories related to the firm`s absorptive capacity. For this purpose, it first introduces a conceptual framework that depicts the process of the accumulation of absorptive capacity at the firm level. Using this framework as an analytical tool, it analyzes the economic performance of the Korea`s past and diagnoses economic health of the Korea`s future. Then, it concludes by offering several implications for corporate management and public policy.
-
김인수(Lin Su Kim) 한국경영학회 1999 經營學硏究 Vol.28 No.3
Knowledge management has recently emerged as an appealing subject in management literature. Although its history is short, it can benefit greatly from the long history of other related disciplines in building its theories. Innovation, organizational learning, knowledge creation, organizational capability buiding, technology transfer and network, information technology, organizational behavior, and intellectual capital are the disciplines that have accumulated theories related to knowledge management. This paper first presents a conceptual framework that integrates three dimensions: the characteristics of knowledge (tacit and explicit), knowledge process(acquisition, creation, diffusion, storing, measurement, and application of knowledge), and the unit of analysis (individual, organization, sector, and nation). The conceptual framework produces a number of cells that need to be filled by new theories in order to understand knowledge management better. It then reviews existing theories available in the related disciplines that may be used as building blocks in constructing new theories for these cells. Finally, based on the theories available in other disciplines, the paper suggests a set of future research directions for knowledge management at the level of individual, organization, sector, and nation.
-
-
-
-
정명일(Myung Il Chung),김인수(Lin Su Kim) 한국경영학회 1997 經營學硏究 Vol.26 No.4
The purpose of this paper is to review the studies of diversification and to propose a framework for future studies. The results of this study are as follows; First, industrial organization thought and resource base view(RBV) are compared. Second, we evaluate RBV with the questions, How can firms acquire resources? Third, we propose an integrated framework for future research. Resource development has to be decided after deliberate consideration on the company`s present limitations and future needs. Our major contribution is that diversification is not a simple means to enlarge business but a deliberate behavior to create new capability. Finally, we analyse the limitations of the present study and propose some issues for future research.
-
정종태(Jong Tae Jeong),김인수(Lin Su Kim) 한국경영학회 1998 經營學硏究 Vol.27 No.3
A vast amount of speculations and researches on how information technology might affect organizational structure has proceeded since the introduction of information technology to the organization. Yet, because most researchers postulated direct links between information technology and organizational structure, their works have been confusing and contradictory. The purposes of this study is to criticize researches in this area and understand the dynamic process by which information technology affects the structure of organizations by using a theoretical framework based an the social network theory. According to structuration theory and social network theory, information technology is not regarded as a factor causing or even constraining structure. Rather, information technology is an occasion for structuring because its presence provokes human interactions that may subsequently effect organizational structure. A more adequate understanding of how information technology and organizational structure are related may require attention to social dynamics and human action. Unlike in the view which structure stands outside of and prior to human endeavor, structure is understood as an emergent property of ongoing action.
-
김인수,박현태 고려대학교 경영대학 1997 경영논총 Vol.41 No.1
본 연구는 절차적 정의와 조직몰입, 그리고 성격(통제소재)간의 관계를 이론적으로 고찰하고, 실증적으로 검증한 것이다. 지금까지 조직정의에 대한 연구는 상황변수를 간과함으로써 한계에 부딪히고 있다. 이 연구에서는 상황변수인 개인의 성격(통제소재)을 도입해서 절차적 정의와 조직몰입간의 관계를 연구했다. 연구결과를 요약해보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 절차적 정의가 높을수록 조직몰입도가 높게 나타났다. ① 내재론자의 경우는 절차적 정의와 조직몰입이 비교적 강한 양의 상관관계를 가졌다. ② 외재론자의 경우는 절차적 정의와 조직몰입간의 상관관계가 낮았다. 둘째, 내재론자는 왜재론자보다 조직몰입도가 높게 나타났다 셋째, 내재론자는 왜재론자보다 조직몰입에 있어 절차적 정의에 더 민감함이 입증됐다
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
