http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 김원중 (검색결과 900 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
김원중 한국토지공법학회 2017 土地公法硏究 Vol.78 No.-
For the development of a country and its society. the country has an authority to order and force the people to do what it enforces by the law. So, the people have obligations to do what the country orders and their rights are limited by the law. But, when restricting the rights of the people and imposing obligations to them, the country should be in accordance with the Constitution that guarantees the fundamental rights of the people. Unless it is, it could infringe on the fundamental rights. In this reason, placing restraints on the people's rights is strictly regulated by the law, which is legislated by the congress, The law stipulates related matters with the rights of the people so that the people should clearly understand the regulations in the law. To do so, the terms demonstrated in the law should be general and common sense. As a result, it accords with the purpose of legalism that the law pursues. In spite of that, the regulations in the current law of administration are so vague, even being stated in Chinese characters, that they are difficult to be understood. Therefore, they should be stipulated specifically and clearly. That is the basic thing to make sure the fundamental rights of the people. By doing that, the country is able to attain the purpose of the legalism. In conclusion, in order to achieve a law-abiding administration, this study suggests that the terms in the law should be stated in realistic words people usually use in their daily lives by limiting the usage of vague and abstract terms. 국가는 국가와 사회의 발전을 위해 법률을 통하여 국민에 대하여 명령・강제하는 행위를 하고 있다. 국민에 대한 명령・강제작용은 법률이라는 형식에 의해 국민의 권리를 제한하고 의무를 가하고 있다. 국민에 대한 권리제한과 의무부과는 헌법상의 기본권을 보호하는 범위 내에 있어야 하며, 이를 위반할 경우 기본권 침해가 발생할 수 있다. 따라서 기본권보호를 위하여 국민의 권리제한 등에 대하여는 의회가 제정한 법률로 엄격히 정하도록 하고 있다. 법률은 국민의 권리와 관련되는 내용을 정한 것으로 국민은 누구나 법률에서 규정한 사항을 명확히 이해할 필요가 있다. 법률을 이해하기 위해서는 법률에서 사용하는 용어가 일반적이고 상식적이어야 한다. 법률이 가장 기본적이고 상식적인 현대 생활의 용어를 사용할 경우 법이 추구하고 있는 법치주의의 목적에 부합하게 된다. 그럼에도 불구하고 현행 행정법상에서 사용하고 있는 법률은 너무 추상적이고 한자식 표기를 사용하고 있어, 이해의 곤란성을 가지고 있다. 법률이 추상적으로 규정되는 것은 행정편의주의와 신속성 등을 달성할 수 있는 장점은 있으나, 행정의 자의에 의한 독단으로 빠질 수 있는 단점이 있다. 행정에서 사용하는 법률에 대한 구체적이고 명확한 용어 사용은 국민의 기본권을 보호하는데 가장 기본적인 사항이다. 법률이 명확하고 쉬운 용어를 사용할 경우 법이 추구하고 있는 법치행정의 목적을 달성할 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 법치행정을 달성하기 위하여 행정법에서 사용하고 있는 법률용어의 추상성과 재량성에 대하여 구체성과 재량성을 제한하고 법률용어의 현실적 용어 사용을 통하여 법치행정을 구현하여야 한다는 것을 제시하였다.
-
-
김원중 중국인문학회 2011 中國人文科學 Vol.0 No.49
In this paper, I'd like to mention that the main point of Sima Qian's interpretion theory takes the first step on the statement that 'bian: change' has more meaningful value than 'tong: tradition'. He thought that the word 'change' is different and relative concept when compared to the permanency belonging to tradition, which emphasizes not on just following Confucius's opinion but on expanding individual's open perspectives. In other words, he wasn't willing to accept the historical facts by their traditional thinking, rather, he tried to absorb it abreast of times. Therefore, he thought it is natural that history is changing and it is historian's responsibility to show the real nature of history by changing the aspects to as time goes on. Through this perspective, he wrote more about contemporary history. There are reasons that had an effect on his perspective. First, the scholastic mantle of his home was Taoism and his father Sima Dam was well versed in Yin and Yang theory and astronomy. Sima Qian considered the Chinese history as the consequences of numerous changes, which is very innovative and so rare perspective in that he has the entirely different origin of perspective from the reactionism of the Confucius's and this perspective is difficult to find in the entire history. Though it isn't true that Sima Qi an ignored the Confucianism, his viewpoint takes more note on Taoism rather than Confucianism.
-
김원중 중국인문학회 2016 中國人文科學 Vol.0 No.64
Through this review, it is confirmed that the fundamental writing strategy of Lao Tzu starts from basic recognition about the relationship between human’s thinking and language. His outstanding writing skills are shown in that Lao Tzu denied language itself in terms of his critical thinking as to human’s attempts to image and promote inherent nature. From the perspective of Lao Tzu, although the ‘Dao’ is the real value of human pursuit, it is hard to express this entirely by human language. To sum up, as Lao Tzu’s premise was the existence of conscience or recognition before its expression of language, we should understand his insight to language not as black and white but as the paradox that there is no way to explain Dao without language. As reviewed in this paper, we can assume that Thus, it is impossible to show all perspectives of Dao in that Dao is complete, eternal, comprehensive, and natural because it doesn’t have any light, sound, and face. Lao Tzu has twofold stance in that he leaves his own text with recognizing the contradiction that the thinking expressed by language is not inherent thinking. Lao Tzu is the excellent magician of language who efforts to put Dao into the fixed frame called language, while denying preserving human’s thinking in the frame of language. As shown in this paper, we should know that the use of infinitives in the linguistic expression and conceptual rule of ‘Dao’ shows the aspects of paradoxical writing pursuing revealing the characteristics of ‘Dao’. Namely, as though ‘Dao’ is the absolute being disapproving any conceptual rule which cannot be named something, for those who don’t understand ‘Dao’ the tool ‘language’ is needed and by linguistic technique like infinitive, figure of speech, and metaphor he wanted to improve persuasive power of his text.
-
-
-
-
-
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
