http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
철-크롬 산화환원흐름전지에서 Nafion막의 철-크롬 Crossover
김영숙,오소형,김은비,김다영,김성지,추천호,박권필,Kim, Young-Sook,Oh, So-Hyeong,Kim, Eunbi,Kim, Dayoung,Kim, Seongji,Chu, Cheun-Ho,Park, Kwonpil 한국화학공학회 2018 Korean Chemical Engineering Research(HWAHAK KONGHA Vol.56 No.1
산화환원흐름전지(Redox Flow Battery, RFB)는 대용량 에너지 저장장치로 바나듐 산화환원흐름전지가 대표적인 RFB인데, VRFB는 고가인 점이 문제다. 철-크롬RFB는 저가의 활물질을 사용해 경제적인 점이 장점인데, 성능이 낮은 점이 해결해야할 과제다. 낮은 성능의 한 원인이 활물질의 크로스오버인데, 본 연구에서 철과 크롬 이온의 Nafion 막 크로스오버 및 Nafion 막의 안정성에 대해 실험하였다. 철과 크롬이온의 Nafion 막 투과도는 각각 $5.5{\times}10^{-5}$, $6.0{\times}10^{-5}cm^2/min$ 이었다. Nafion 막에서 바나듐 이온의 투과도 $2.9{\times}10^{-6}cm^2/min$ 보다 18.9~20.7배 높아 철과 크롬 이온의 Nafion 막 크로스오버가 성능 저하의 한 원인임을 보였다. 온도 증가에 따라 크로스오버가 급증(활성화 에너지 38.8 kJ/mol)하므로 낮은 온도에서 구동하는 것이 크로스오버에 의한 성능감소를 저하시키는 방법임을 나타냈다. Nafion막은 3M HCl용액에서 비교적 안정적이었다.
의치 장착 노인과 임플란트 장착 노인의 저작능력 및 삶의 질 비교 연구
김영숙,전보혜,Kim, Young-Sook,Jun, Boe-He 한국치위생학회 2011 한국치위생학회지 Vol.10 No.2
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of oral health on the quality of life of elderly patients with dentures or implants. It is our intention that through this analysis we can aid seniors in making the choice between dentures or implants, considering future masticatory function and the likely effects of this decision on the patients quality of life. Methods : This survey was conducted between November 1, 2010 and November 25, 2010, in Kyunggi-Do, whasung city. The research was carried out at one public health center, among elderly patients. 105 seniors were surveyed using the direct interviewing method, oral health related quality of life was measured by the Philadelphia Geriatric Center(PGC) Morale Scale. Collected data was examined using the SPSS 13.0 program, using frequency, mean, and standard deviation analysis, T-test and $x^2$ test. Results : The number of residual teeth for patients who have implants was $20.45{\pm}5.85$, while among those patients with dentures the number was considerably lower, $8.11{\pm}7.66$(p<0.05). The results of patients masticatory function, was $28.13{\pm}2.40$ for those with implants, and $25.35{\pm}4.15$ with dentures. The results were better for those with implants. Among implant patients overall satisfaction was rated $25.21{\pm}3.63$, higher than for those with dentures $20.20{\pm}6.79$(p<0.05). Quality of life was scored higher for patients with implants($12.76{\pm}2.61$) compared to those with dentures($10.47{\pm}3.52$)(p<0.05). The subjects masticatory function was highly related to the number of remaining teeth and greater masticatory function had a positive effect on patients quality of life and life satisfaction. Conclusion : Dental treatments such as dentures and implants will have a great influence on patients quality of life and life satisfaction. Implants can improve the oral health related quality of life and satisfaction and the general quality of life more than denture therapy.