RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        체육철학의 관점에서 본『포박자』의 양생사상

        김부찬 한국체육철학회 2009 움직임의철학 : 한국체육철학회지 Vol.17 No.3

        Bao Pu Zi(抱朴子) is the Dong-Jin(東晋) Ge-Hong’s(葛洪) writing compilation of China’s Shin-Sun(神仙) Thought and Yang-Saeng Thought (taking care of health). Shin-Sun(神仙) Thought and Yang-Saeng Thought(taking care of health) is composed of outer and inner level systems, and the only system to effectively show the complete form of both levels is the Bao Pu Zi. Along with Ju-Yeok-Cham-Dong-Gae(周易參同契), Bao Pu tzu is evaluated as a Taoist conception. In this essay, the Yang-Saeng aspect of Taoist philosophy as it is presented by Ge-Hong in Bao Pu Zi will be evaluated from the viewpoint of Sports Philosophy. Our goal is to look at Ge-Hong's ideas about Yangsaeng and find a correlation between Ge-Hong's ideas and their modern counterpart in Sports Philosophy and the value and implication it may have in Sports education. 『포박자』는 동진(東晋)시기 갈홍(葛洪)의 저서로서 중국의 신선사상(神仙思想)과 양생사상(養生思想)을 집대성한 저술이다. 신선사상과 양생사상은 외단(外丹)과 내단(內丹)의 체계로 구성되어 있는데, 이러한 체계의 완전한 모습을 보이고 있는 것이『포박자』이다. 『주역참동계(周易參同契)』와 더불어 도교사상을 집대성한 저술로 평가되고 있다. 본고에서는 체육철학의 관점에서『포박자』속에 나타난 양생사상의 내용을 살펴보았다. 즉 『포박자』에 나타난 신선사상과 양생법에 대한 구체적인 내용을 살펴보았으며, 이와 더불어 이러한 양생사상이 지닌 현대 체육철학적 함의와 체육교육적 가치가 무엇인지를 밝혔다.

      • 한국 스포츠계의 도덕성 부재 현상에 대한 스포츠 윤리학적 접근

        김부찬 한국스포츠리서치 2004 한국 스포츠 리서치 Vol.15 No.1

        This paper approaches the immoral phenomenon in Korean sports world from the viewpoint of sports ethics as a part of scientific work. First of all, I referred to the existing research papers on sports ethics by the specialists majoring in sports philosophy. And then I emphasized the necessity of the approach from the viewpoint of sports ethics on that phenomenon. I made an analysis of the cause of that phenomenon and presented the ethical discussions about the interrelationship with sports and morality. Lastly I expressed my opinion on the plans to recover morality in Korean sports world. Korean sports is closely connected with the moderns' life. Sports performs a part of informing the image of nation and enterprise to the world. And the range of life sports is widely spreaded. Therefore I think that they have to recover the morality in Korean sports. This critical mind and approach has a character of scientific confrontation in the world of sports philosophy about the realistic demand.

      • KCI등재후보
      • KCI등재

        퇴계의 敬사상에 있어서 몸의 문제

        김부찬 충남대학교 유학연구소 2011 儒學硏究 Vol.25 No.-

        본 논문은 체육철학의 관점에서 퇴계의 경(敬)사상을 조망하고자 하는 것이 목적이다. 인간이란 마음과 몸으로 구성되어 있다. 철학이란 이상적인 인간이 되기 위한 지적․도덕적․예술적․종교적 활동의 총체라 할 수 있다. 퇴계의 학문의 목표는 한마디로 성인이 되기 위한 것이며, 그 성격은 도학(道學)이라고 생각한다. 그리고 그의 사상은 정이(程頤)와 주자(朱子)의 영향을 받았다. 퇴계철학에 있어서 몸 혹은 심신관(心身觀)에 대한 그간의 논의는 활인심방(活人心方)에 나타난 양생법에 주목되어 있었다. 그런데 퇴계가 인식하고 있던 몸의 중심문제는 ‘성인됨으로서 몸가짐을 어떻게 해야 하는가?’하는 것이라 할 수 있다. 따라서 퇴계의 경사상에 있어서 몸의 문제를 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 본고는 이러한 문제의식 아래 퇴계의 경사상이 집약된 성학십도(聖學十圖)에 나타난 몸의 문제를 살펴보았다. 특히 ‘소학도(小學圖)’와 ‘숙흥야매잠도(夙興夜寐箴圖)’의 내용을 분석하여 퇴계의 몸에 대한 인식을 도출하고, 이러한 인식과 경사상 간의 유기적 관련성을 규명하였다. In this study I look at Toegye's Concept of 'Kyoung' in the context of the philosophy of physical education. A man consists of mind and body, and philosophy is a variety of activities, be it intellectual, moral, aesthetic, or religious, he performs to perfect himself. The goal of Toegye's studies was to become a man of integrity, and that is why he is a moral philosopher. He was influenced by chég yí程頤�) and zhūzǐ�(朱子). Traditionally, discussions on Toegye's view of body and mind have been focused on the regimen he described in Hoal-In-Sim-Bang(活人心方). However, his real goal in all that talk on health seems to have been finding a way to properly manage one's body to become a holy man. In addition, the problem of body is central in his concept of kyoung. Songhak Sipdo(聖學十圖) is a good place to start when we want to study his view of body and kyoung. I focus on Sohakdo(小學圖) and The Collecyion of comments about the Sukhengyamaejangdo(夙興夜寐箴圖) in that text and discuss the organic connection between his view on body and the concept of kyoung(敬).

      • KCI등재
      • 國際投資紛爭解決制度 : 受容國과 國際企業間의 投資紛爭을 중심으로

        金富燦 제주대학교 1988 논문집 Vol.26 No.1

        The beat mechanism in the settlement of investment disputes is the prevention of disputes. We have to be concerned about taking the appropriate preventive measures, the stress, therefore, should be placed on the substantive points of agreement about investment between States(host, countries) and foreign private investors(Transnational Corporations:TNCs). But it seems that the possibilities for the consensus in the substantive rules of the international investment are limited by the divergent views between and among host countries and home countries(including TNCs). All efforts at international action for the protecton of investment are limited by the basic conflict between the belief of the capital-exporters(home countries and TNCs) that their property is entitled to protection under international law, and the belie of the capital importers(host countries) that foreign investment should be subject to national law. It remains true of the settlement of investment disputes. A major area in which the international framework is still deficient is the settlement of investment disputes between parties of different nationalities, especially between States and nationals of other States. From the traditional point of view, the individual can't bring up a claim on the basis of international law, and always have to turn to his home country. Host countries have insisted on the settlement of investment disputes between themselves and foreign private investors in their own tribunals, and have offered opposition to home countries'diplomatic protection on behalf of their nationals(TNCs). I think that both the arguments of home countries and those of host countries should be criticized. If the aim of internationa law is to settle the international dispute in a manner fair and just to the parties involved and to give greater securtv to the flow of international investment, it could be accompolished through the establishment of international machinery for the settlement of investment disputes. The organization of internatinoal settlement of disputes resulting from contracts between States and foreign private investors is based in particular on the comperation of the host countries concerned. The cooperation of the parties os indispensable for the build-up and the functioning of the organization of the internaional dispute settlement. The cooperation between States and foreign private investors (TNCs could be enhanced by the recognition of a certain degeree of international legal personality of the private parts. In my opinion, a solution would perhaps be to seek the application of international law on the basis of the recognition of a certain degree of international legal personality of TNCs. Such a solution could benefit social progres and development in that it enable the international economic community to define more efficiently and meaningfully the relation between both groups of international economic actors as well as thier mutual responsibilities under the aegis of international dispute settlement a a last resort. The World Bank has taken the lead in this area by establishing an associated Institution, the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes(ICSID). ICSID is the most recent and promising machinery in this field. It was designed to encourage the flow of private foreign investment to the less developed countries by creating the possibility, subject to the consent of both parties, for acontracting State and a foreign private investor who is a national of another contracting State, to settle any legal dispute that might arise out of such an investment by arbitration before an impartial international forum. ICSID anticipates the view that the breach by a State of its contractual obligations towards a foreign private investor may involve international responsibility, and recognizes the procedural capacity of a foreign private investor for bring up a claim on the basis of international law. But its work thus far has been very limited mainly because of the nonparticipation of many countries, especially in Latin America on the grounds that disputes in their countries should be settled under national jurisdiction. This raises the issue how to widen the use of ICSID.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼