축구 선수의 기능평가를 위한 준거지향 기능설정에 관한연구

김목수 성균관대학교 1999 스포츠과학논집 Vol.4 No.-

축구선수의 기능 평가를 위한 준거지향 기준설정에 관한 연구

김목수,엄한주 성균관대학교 1999 스포츠과학논집 Vol.4 No.-

체육측정평가 : 축구기술 측정 및 준거평가 기준설정

김목수(KimMok-Soo),엄한주(EomHan-Joo) 한국체육학회 2000 한국체육학회지 Vol.39 No.4

본 연구는 스포츠기능검사의 타당성을 높이고 검사결과에 대한 다양한 평가방안을 제시하기 위해 측정 이론적 측면에서 고안한 측정수단을 기초로 축구 기술수준이 각각 다른 세 집단(중학교, 고등학교, 대학교)을 대상으로 (n=359) 축구기술 평가를 위한 준거기준을 제공하기 위하여 수행되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 축구경기의 주요 기 술인 헤딩, 지그재그 드리블, 롱 킥, 드리블 슛, 슛, 센터링, 30m 드리블, 10m 왕복 드리블 등 8개의 측정항목을 중심으로 선수들의 축구기술을 측정하였으며 측정결과를 집단별로 비교·분석하기 위해 Berk(1976, 1986)의 준거집 단모형을 이용하여 중학교·고등학교·대학교 선수들의 기술수준을 분류할 수 있는 준거평가기준을 설정하였다.자료의 분석은 먼저 중학교·고등학교·대학교 선수 집단간의 평균치 차이에 대한 일원변량분석 (oneway-ANOVA)을 실시하였으며 변량분석에서 집단간 유의한 차이가 있는 측정항목에 한해서는 준거집단분석과 타당성을 검증하였다.본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다.1. 중학교·고등학교·대학교 선수들의 기술측정치에 대한 분석결과에 의하면 대학교 선수들의 기술이 가장 우수하였으며 모든 집단간 유의한 차이가 나타났다.2. 정분류비와 타당도계수 그리고 기대최대효용성 등을 고려하여 산정된 중학교와 고등학교 선수의 준거기준 점수는 헤딩 4.3초, 지그재그 드리블 11.9초, 롱 킥 38cm, 드리블 슛 6.1초, 슛 24점, 센터링 5점, 30m 드리블 5.7초, 10m 왕복 드리블은 6.1초 등으로 산출되었다.3. 고등학교와 대학교 선수의 준거기준 점수는 헤딩 9.1초 지그재그 드리블 10.6초, 롱 킥 47m, 드리블 슛 5.4초, 슛 27~28점, 센터링 12점, 30m 드리블 5.0초, 10m 왕복 드리블은 55초로 산출되었다. The primary purpose of this study was to set criterion-referenced standards for soccer performance to differentiate the skill levels of soccer players from junior and senior high schools, and college varsity teams. The soccer skill tests conducted in this study consisted of eight items such as heading, zigzag dribble, long kick, dribble shoot, shoot, centering, 30m dribble, and 10m shuttle dribble.Descriptive analyses and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the performances of the 3 groups and a criterion-groups model advanced by Berk(1976, 1986) was applied to obtain an optimal cut-off score to set the criterion-referenced standards. These standards were used to separate the group memberships of the subjects according to their performance levels. From these analyses die following results were attained:1. The comparison of the mean performances among the 3 groups revealed, as expected, that college group was prominent in all 8 skills, followed by the senior and junior groups.2. As granted by the significant results of ANOVA, the criterion-groups analysis was applied and the results suggested that reasonably adequate and valid criterion-referenced standards could be obtained to differentiate the levels of soccer performance among the 3 groups. The cut-off score between the junior and senior groups in each test item was; 4.3 sec in heading 11.9 sec. in zigzag dribble, 38m in long kick, 6.1 sec. in dribble shoot, 24 pts. in shoot, 5 pts. in centering, 5.7 sec. in 30m dribble, 6.1sec. in 10m shuttle dribble, and between the senior high and university groups was; 9.1 sec. in heading 10.6 sec. in zigzag dribble, 47m in long kick, 5.4 sec. in dribble shoot 27-28 pts. in shoot, 12 pts. in centering, 5.0 sec. in 30m dribble, 5.5 sec. in 10m shuttle dribble.

대학 육상경기 전공수업 평가를 위한 준거지향 기준치 설정

김목수(Kim Mog Su) 한국체육측정평가학회 2002 한국체육측정평가학회지 Vol.4 No.2

측정평가 : 대학 육상경기 전공수업 평가를 위한 준거지향 기준치 설정

김목수(KimMok-Soo) 한국체육학회 2003 한국체육학회지 Vol.42 No.2

The primary purpose of this study was to provide criterion-referenced standards for the evaluation of university’s track and field class. The subject of the study is focused on 376 freshmen and juniors of physical education major who took the course and the tests are limited to 6 items: high jump, long jump, 100m, shot-put, discus-throwing, javelin-throwing. The track and field records of the subjects before taking the 14-week course(true non-musters) and after taking that course(true musters) were used for this study. Descriptive analyses and a subordinated t-test were used to compare the records of the subjects. These standards were used to calculate the standard score to differentiate each items of track and field. Criterion-referenced standards are set up on the basis of Berk's criterion group model(1976, 1986). The optimal standard scores were produced by calculating probability of correct decision, misclassification error, validity coefficient, expected disutility, expected utility, expected maximum utility and so on The criterion standards for the absolute evaluation of university track and field courses are as follows; 151 cm on high jump, 530 cm on long jump 12.7seconds on 100m, 10.5m on shot-put, 20m on discus-throwing, 30m on javelin-throwing.

청소년의 여가 활동이 심리적 행복감에 미치는 영향

박상욱,김목수,송우엽 성균관대학교 1998 스포츠과학논집 Vol.3 No.-

The purpose of this study was to examine the Effects of Leisure Activity on Psychological Well-Being in Juvenile. Subjects of this study were sampled 221 middle school students(93 male, 128 female). Statistics employed in this study were ANOVA and multiple range test(Scheffe). Cognitive - Emotional State Questionere was used to test Psychological Well-Being that was developed Yang(1996). Results were as follows. First, Participation rate of leisure activity in middle school students was 58.8% of subjects and rate of the type of leisure activity was that sport-related activity was 32.3%, hobby-related activity was 13.8%, inspection-related activity was 28.5%, social intercourse-related activity was 7%, sightseeing-related activity was 5.4%, play-related activity was 26%. Second, there was not difference in Psychological Well-Being as a function of sex. But male subjects evaluated the Psychological Well-Being high than female subjects. Third, Psychological Well-Being as a function of grade was appeared that first grade students feel high Psychological Well-Being than other grades. Forth, Students who participated in leisure activity perceived high Psychological Well-Being than no-participators. Fifth, Psychological Well-Being according to the type of leisure activity was appeared highly in the hobby-related activities and sporty-related activities.

축구기술에 대한 객관적 측정자료와 주관적 평가자료의 비교

엄한주 ( Han Joo Eom ),김목수 ( Mok Soo Kim ) 한국스포츠정책과학원(구 한국스포츠개발원) 2002 체육과학연구 Vol.13 No.2

본 연구는 축구 기초기술에 대한 객관적 측정자료와 지도자의 주관적 평가를 비교하기 위하여 축구경기의 주요 기술인 헤딩, 지그재그 드리블, 롱 킥, 드리블 슛, 슛, 센터링, 30m 드리블, 10m 왕복 드리블 등 8개의 측정항목을 선정하여 중(n=112), 고(n=133), 대학교 선수(n=114)들을 대상으로 축구기술을 측정하였다. 각 측정항목에 대한 지도자의 주관적 평가점수와 측정자료의 관련성을 상관 및 교차분석을 통하여 비교하였으며, 선수들의 종합경기력 평가점수와 가장 관련이 깊은 기술요인을 선별하기 위하여 객관적 측정자료와 주관적 평가자료를 이용하여 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 기초기술 8개 측정항목의 결과에 대한 각 집단별 비교에서는 대학생이 현저하게 우수한 기록을 보였으며, 그 다음으로 고교생, 중학생 집단 순으로 나타났다. 그러나 각 측정항목에 대한 지도자의 주관적 평가점수에서는 대학생과 고교생 집단은 뚜렷한 차이가 보이지 않았다. 측정항목에 대한 측정자료와 각 항목에 대한 지도자의 주관적 평가자료의 관련성에 대한 상관분석 결과에 의하면 두 자료의 상관계수는 매우 낮았으며 전반적으로 객관적 측정자료와 지도자의 주관적 평가자료의 일치성은 매우 낮았다. 객관적 측정자료와 지도자의 주관적 평가자료의 관련성이 매우 낮게 나타난 결과에 대하여 다양한 관점에서 접근하여 차이점을 분석하였으며 전반적으로 스포츠 기술의 객관적 측정 및 평가의 타당성을 높이기 위한 방안을 논의하였다. 지도자의 종합경기력 평가에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보기 위해 실시한 회귀분석결과, 중학생 집단은 기술의 정확성과 기초체력에 관련된 변인, 즉 ``패스의 정확성``, ``돌파력``, 그리고 ``10m 왕복 드리블``이 가장 관련이 많았으며, 고교와 대학 집단은 전반적으로 복합적인 요인, 즉 지도자의 주관적 평가 항목인 ``경기감각``, ``연결동작``, ``킥 및 득점력``이 종합경기력 점수와 가장 관련이 높았다. The primary purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the characteristics between objective and subjective evaluations for soccer skill performances. Eight test items, such as heading, zigzag dribble, long kick, dribble shoot, shoot, centering, 30m dribble, and 10m shuttle dribble, were devised based on valid measurement procedures to investigate the ability of basic soccer skills. Data were collected from the 359 varsity soccer players (112 junior high, 133 senior high, and 114 university athletes) and analyzed using analysis of variance to compare the mean performance of each skill test among the 3 groups. Correlational methods were applied to investigate the relationship between the objective measures of the tests and the subjective measures of the corresponding skills evaluated by the coaches of the participating players. From these analyses the following conclusions were obtained. 1. As being expected, the comparison of the mean performances among the 3 groups revealed that the university group was prominent in all 8 skill tests, followed by the senior high and junior high school players. 2. It was shown that the coach`s subjective evaluation of the players` performance on each test was not quite in agreement with the field test scores. In most test items, there was a moderate size of correlation between the test scores and the coach`s evaluation. However, although it was statistically significant, the magnitude of correlation was not large enough to grant practically meaningful interpretations. 3. The results of multiple regression analyses indicated that the variables significantly contributing to the prediction of the overall playing ability consisted of mostly the subjective measures of the skills evaluated by the coaches.

서울올림픽을 통해서 본 한국현대 미술 연구의 가능성과 과제

김현숙,서유리,조은정,강수정,전유신,목수현,김희영,권행가,김영나,박소현,안소연,김계원,현시원,권영진,신정훈,이애선,문혜진 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) 2018 한국근현대미술사학 Vol.36 No.-

.