PP의 범주적 위상과 기능

김귀순 釜山外國語大學 語學硏究所 1989 外大語文論集 Vol.5 No.-

ABSTRCTThe central topic of this study is the status of the categories preposition and prepositional phrase in the theory of syntax. Syntactic theory enocompasses statments like "X is a lexical category", "Y is a major category", "Z is a cyclic category". The main goal, then, of this investigation will be to determine which ones among these generalizations are significant generalizations, and in particular how the categories P and PP fit into these generalizations about categories. Such a program can only be carried out successfully within a well-elaborated theory of syntax. The extended standard theory (EST) of transformational-generative grammar is such a theory, and it is this theory that is adopted for the purposes of this study. Work within transformational-generative grammar, and within EST in particular, has as its main goal the development of a framework that will permit the formulation of descriptively adequate accounts of linguistic phenomena, and that will determine the formal properties of such accounts in an explanatory way. A grammar, in this view, consists of a core and a periphery. The core part of grammar consists of a limited number of transformational rules that have the form "move o", where o is some category. The constraints and other components of the grammar ensure that this optimally constrained core grammar does not yield any unwanted results. Transformations may be formulated with richer structural descriptions, subject to certain limitations, but such transformations are considered peripheral and are marked in terms of the optimality measure that is part of linguistic theory.

재분석과 전치사 잔류

김귀순 부산 외국어 대학교 1988 外大論叢 Vol.6 No.1

There have been many references to reanalysis and restructuring in the EST literature. It is generally assumed that these processes are not transformational, in that there is no movement in usual sense, but rater that they induce a change in the constituent structure without necesarily changing the linear order of the string. We have seen that the formulation of reanalysis presented in this paper may be used to give interesting analyses of some problematic syntacitic phenomena. Goodal (1985) has depended heavily on Stowell(1081)'s Structure-preserving Constraint, whereas one instead might wnat to rely on something like the Case Filter to rule out undesirable post-reanalysis structure. In addition, Goodal (1985) has assume that reanalysis is brought about by the addition of a single monostring. It has been observed by Van Riemsdijk (1978b) that preposition stranding is a relatively marked phenommenon cross-linguistically. A natural way of deriving this result is to adopt Kayne's(1981) suggestion properly govern its object if it were to assing a θ-role assignment. Riemsdijk(1978b), Stowell(1981) suggests that in some cases, stranding is allowed by virture of Feanalysis-NP Incorporation and Particle Incorporation-conditioned by Structure-Preserving Condition(SPC). Finally, certain serious problems remain unresoved-in particular, the apparent violations of SPC with respects to PP arguments in WH-movement and Tough-movement constructions-but in general it seems that the program of reducing all cases of stranding to reanalysis is feasible. We will leave the relation of restructuring phrase markers to PF and LF to be discussed in a later section.

외국어교육에 있어서의 번역의 문화 매개 기능

김귀순 한국언어과학회 2002 언어과학 Vol.9 No.2

영어 명사의 성차별 지양을 위한 작문 사례 연구

김귀순 부산 외국어 대학교 1999 外大論叢 Vol.19 No.3

This paper aims to address the issue of linguistic sexism in scholarly and professional wirting, while presenting relevant ideas and a set of guidelines for nondiscriminatory usage. Most topics in this paper are focused on discriminatory language usage in the light of current feminist, linguistic and theoretical thinking by identifying provlems and suggesting a range of solutions. At the beginning , we briefly review arguments and research concerning sexist and nonsexist language. We contend that sexism in scholarly writing not only creates difficulties in communication but also misrepresents teaching in modern languages and literature. Even a writer with conservative views on language can find acceptable alternatives to sexist wording, and doing so should be as routine as attending to grammar and style. One fundamental issue involves the inclusion on exclusion of women from that reality. Traditional grammars asserts, for example, that the word man functions generically to encompass humanbeings of both sexes. However, as a result of feminists' efforts on avoiding man, its compounds and other false generics, a lot of alternatives to sexist writing have been invented and being used.

핵이동 결합과 PP이동

김귀순 부산 외국어 대학교 1992 外大論叢 Vol.10 No.1

In this paper I will deal with PP licensing relations within the framework of the government and binding theory, which has been developed in Chomsky(1981) and subsequent works. This paper investigates preposition stranding(P-stranding) in terms of movement theory. In the literature on P-stranding it is assumed that in general P-stranding is marked phenmenon so that in most languages it is excluded by general constraints. As to the nature of these constraints, some types of proposals can be distinguished. It covers syntactic incorporation phenomena in case of extraction of some NP from PP. Incorporation refers to the syntactic movement of X-o category so that it adjoins to the governing X-o. The distribution of incorporation process can be explained in terms of the Empty Category Principle as it applies to the trace of the moved X-o. In order to explain that some NP from PP can be extractable, incorporation theory is the most promising. We propose the incorporatin constraint, that is to say, incorporated complex category V+P must inherit the index of the preposition and govern object of the preposition. In conclusion, in order for some NP be extractable out of PP construction, the preposition incorporation must occur and it should obey the incorporation constraint we proposed in case of move-α out of prepositional phrase.

결빙 관막음시 배관내 유체 결빙현상의 실험적 연구

김귀순,박영돈,조현철,최병익 대한기계학회 2001 大韓機械學會論文集B Vol.25 No.3

전치사 좌초의 제 분석

김귀순 부산 외국어 대학교 1990 外大論叢 Vol.8 No.1

This paper investigates preposition stranding (p-stranding) in terms of movement theory. In the literature on p-stranding it is assumed that in general p-stranding is a marked phenomenon so that in most languages it is excluded by general constraints. As to the nature of these constraints, some types of proposals can be distinguished. Van Riemsdijk(1978) proposed that p-stranding is generally barred because PP is a binding category. Effectively this bars all extraction out of PP. Kayne(1981) argues that in general, extraction out of PP is impossible because P is not a proper governor for the Empty Category Principle(ECP). Basically these conditions state that any trace of movement must be coindexed with a c-commanding antecedent, and must be governed by a lexical category. Stowell(1981)'s Structure Preserving Conditions on Reanalysis also provides the basis for a principled account of the lack of reanalysis rules in certain languages. Chomsky(1986b) develops a theory of a unified apporach to the theories of government and binding Chomsky(1987) suggests some revisions of Chomsky(1986)'s theory of barriers. In this paper, we discussed the revisions in order to set the stage for a better explanation of p-stranding phenomena within the framework of Chomsky(1987).

기후친화 커뮤니티의 조성과제

김귀순 한국지방정부학회 2010 한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집 Vol.2010 No.8

어휘 전치사

김귀순 釜山外國語大學校 1998 外大論叢 Vol.18 No.3

Although there are discrepancies and inconsistencies in the description of the characteristics ofr English prepositions, a lot of work has been carried out to define their categorial properties. In this paper it is demonstrated on empirical grounds that a uniform description of various uses of prepositions, as suggested by Jespersen(1924), Fillmore(1969) or Jackendoff(1977), is not justified. Instead, prepositional variants can be distinguished to be divided into two classes of lexical and nonlexical ones based on syntactic evidence with some consideration of semantic properties. Lexical properties of prepositional variants are summarized in the following: 1. Lexical prepostions may take NP, CP and/or PP complements; they may also be intransitive; they allow pre-or postmodifying adjuncts; they allow a specifier. 2. Sexical prepositions in general assign structural case except “caes preposition”. 3. Lexical prepositions are two-place predicate: P(x,y).

젠더와 영어 공손어법

김귀순 한국언어과학회 2003 언어과학 Vol.10 No.2