
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김광조(Kwang Jo Kim) 영남중국어문학회 1996 중국어문학 Vol.28 No.1
In this paper, we have discussed $quot;Existential/Presentational Sentences$quot; and $quot;Sentences Without Subject$quot; in Mandarin Chinese, based on Ergative Hypothesis which was first proposed by Perlmutter (1978) and later incorporated into Government and Binding Theory by Burzio (1981, 1986). Ergative Hypothesis claims that there are two classes of intransitive verbs - unergatives and ergatives - each associated with a distinct syntactic configuratiosn in the following way: Unergative verbs: [IP NP [vp V ]] Ergative verbs: [IP [vp V NP ]] Semantically, ergative verbs tend to be associated with the meanings of existence, appearance, disappearance, spatial configuration, motion, emission, change of state. Throughout the paper, we have corroborated that syntactic configurations of Existential/Presentational Sentences arid Sentences Without Subject display those of ergative verbs and the verbs appearing in these constructions are restricted to those which have meanings attributed to the semantics of ergative verbs studied by Levin and Rappaport (1995).
중고한어의 순치음화 음운변화에 대한 음운 조건 ( 1 ) : Karlgren 과 Chao Yuen Ren 이론의 비교 연구
김광조 ( Kwang Jo Kim ) 영남중국어문학회 1992 중국어문학 Vol.20 No.1
This paper has dealt with the problem as to what is the phonological condition for dentalabialization in Middle Chinese, especially focussing on Karlgren`s and Chao Yuen Ren`s theories. After we scrutinized them, we came to the conclusion that Chao`s phonological condition for dentalabialization is descriptively more adequate and has more explanatory power but we need to revise the vowels of some finals in Karlgren`s MC reconstructions: i.e., Wei 微-(j)e˘i/-(j)we˘i → -(j)◎i/-(j)w◎i, You 幽-i◎u→ -je˘u, Qin 侵 -j◎m→ -je˘m, Zheng 蒸-j◎ng→ -je˘ng, Geng 庚 -◎ng/-w◎ng/-j◎ng/-jw◎ng→ -ang /-wang/-jang/-jwang, Yang 陽 -jang/ jwang→ -ja^ng/-jwa^ng. Chao Yuen Ren`s phonological condition for dentalabialization in Middle Chinese can be formalized in the following scheme.
김광조(Kwang Jo Kim) 영남중국어문학회 1998 중국어문학 Vol.31 No.1
The content of the paper is summarized as follows: In Chapter 2, Resultative Verb Compounds (hereafter RVC) is first classified according to the syntactic types of their component verbs, Vl and V2, and further according to thematic co-relations between the arguments of RVC and the theta-roles assigned by these component verbs. In Chapter 3, we have tried to generalize the semantic restrictions imposed upon V1 and V2 based on the results of the analysis done in Chapter 2. First, only the action verbs which explicitly contain Agent and the experiencer verbs which implicitly contain Causer can appear in V1. This means that the semantic role of V1 in RVC must specify $quot;Action$quot; or $quot;Cause$quot;. Second, the semantic role of V2 is that it must represent the states of change or the results caused by V1. In Chapter 4, we have analyzed the theta-grids and the argument structures of RVC according to Theta-identification, Theta-role Prominency, Head-feature Percolation, Thematic Hierarchy. The heads of RVC is claimed to be both V1 and V2, which percolate their thematic features to the RVC. However, it is also contended that V2 is the primary head but V1 the secondary. As a result, the thematic features of V2 always percolate to the theta-grid of RVC but those of V1 only optionally do so. And when the two theta-roles percolated from V1 and V2 are identified into one theta-role, that of V2 takes the precedence over that of V1 in the theta-grid of RVC. Causative RVC is derived from the corresponding unaccusative RVC by External Theta-role Addition Rule in the lexicon. And it is observed that these newly assigned theta-roles in RVC obey Unified Thematic Hierarchy suggested by Gu (1992). The argument structures of RVC`s is first analyzed into those of unaccusatives and transitives based on the following criteria. First, RVC`s in which Theme or Experiencer of V2 is identified with Agent or Experiencer of V1 are classified as unaccusative verbs, and those in which Experiencer or Theme of V2 independently percolates to the theta-grid of RVC or is identified with the internal theta-role of V1 are classified as transitive verbs. Second, causative RVC`s are the derived transitive verbs from the corresponding unaccusative verbs with a newly created external argument Causer. Finally we have also discussed two kinds of Pseudo-transitive RVC`s and identified them as unaccusative RVC`s with a cognate object and with Possessor Raising Construction.