노춘인형 희수

김관호 慶熙大學校 文理科大學 國語國文學會 1982 慶熙語文學 Vol.5 No.1

Undiagnosed light chain systemic amyloidosis: does it matter to anesthesiologists?-a case report-

김관호,이우경,라세희,이종석 대한마취통증의학회 2013 Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Vol.65 No.5

Light chain systemic amyloidosis is rare but may accompany laryngeal or pulmonary involvement, which may increase the risk in airway management. We present a case of a patient planned for resection of cervical epidural mass. The patient had face and neck ecchymoses and purpuras with an unknown cause. Mask ventilation and intubation were successful, but the operation was cancelled to evaluate bleeding from facial skin lesions. A diagnosis of light chain systemic amyloidosis prompted evaluation of involvement of other organs and treatment. This case shows the importance of preoperative evaluation and careful airway management in patients with systemic amyloidosis.

[특별기획] 개인 스스로 체력단련, 강군으로 통하는 지름길이다

김관호 월간군사저널 2023 월간군사 Vol.2023 No.3

가격비교서비스에서 아이템셋 생성을 위한 아이템 랭킹기법

김관호,정범석,양용석,박종헌 한국경영과학회 2011 한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.2011 No.5

한용운사상연구 : 만해사상연구회편 제 2 집 - 간행사

김관호 만해사상연구회 1981 韓龍雲思想硏究 Vol.2 No.1

국가안보 차원의 외국인직접투자 규제 -한국과 미국의 관련 규제의 비교 고찰-

김관호 한국경제연구원 2009 규제연구 Vol.18 No.1

본 논문에서는 외촉법 시행령상의 국가안보 차원의 외국인투자 규제의 내용을 미국의 관련 규제와 비교 고찰하고 있다. 국가의 핵심적인 기간시설의 보호, 외국정부의 국부펀드 유입에 대한 통제 등을 포함하여 포괄적인 국가안보의 차원에서 외국인투자 규제를 하고 있는 미국의 경우와 달리 우리나라는 군수산업과 밀접히 연계된 경우에 한해 제한적인 규제를 하고 있다. 또한 심사 절차와 기구 등 규제의 운용 측면에서도 국가안보 위해성 제거라는 측면보다는 외국인투자에 친화적인 규제로서의 성격이 상대적으로 강하다. 국가안보 차원에서의 외국인투자의 규제는 충분한 진정성하에서 타당한 규제일 수 있으나 단지 기업의 경영권 보호 목적으로 국가안보 차원의 규제가 남용되는 상황은 경계되어야 할 것이다.

중국-대만 양안관계와 한반도 통일

김관호 북한연구소 2015 北韓 Vol.- No.521

독일 통일과정에서의 갈등사례가 한반도에 주는 시사점

김관호 동국대학교 북한학연구소 2010 북한학연구 Vol.6 No.1

Germany shared similar circumstances in many aspects up until reunification. This study examines the conflict management measures which was taken during the German reunification process and identifies the lessons from the German experience, and what its implications are in preparing the future reunification of Korea. For the social integration of two societies, Germany sought to advance mutual understanding by driving reconciliation and cooperation policies. An early military integration helped to maintain the peace intact and the education program which was designed to convert East Germans into democratic nationals successfully served its role. While East/West Germany had not experienced a brutal civil war, unlike South/North Korea, they still suffered from the aftermath of reunification. What if South/North Korea emerge together without the preparation of post-unification issues?Therefore the aftermath and various conflicts found during the unilaterally absorbing unification of Germany demonstrate an idea that Korea should conduct an in-depth study regarding those issues and find solutions for its own sake. This year marks the 60th anniversary of the Korean War which resulted in two confronting regimes. In order to minimize the conflict between the South and the North, a long-term reunification policy must be set and the discussion regarding reunification should be evolved into a public consensus through democratic means. Furthermore, constant efforts should be made so that the North Korean society overcome its isolatist lock-out state from the rest of the international community. The example of German reunification provides an important reference that an ultimate unification must be based on the social, economic, political,systematic and military integration, which can be accomplished only through mutual understanding in order to minimize possible troubles and side effects of the reunification process. 본 연구는 분단의 원인부터 통일에 이르기까지 한반도의 경우와 가장 흡사한독일 통일과정에서 추진되었던 갈등관리 방안에 관한 고찰을 통해 남북한 통일시 발생할 갈등을 해소하는 방안을 모색하는 데 목적이 있다. 독일은 사회통합을 위해 화해와 교류·협력정책 추진을 통해 상호 이해의 폭을 넓혔으며 군사적 통합을 우선적으로 달성하여 안정을 꾀하였고, 민주시민교육 등을 통해 새로운 체제에 대한 이해와 적응력을 증대시켜 많은 성과를 거두었다. 한편, 동서독은 남북한처럼 치열한 전쟁을 겪지 않았는데도 후유증이 심각한데 우리가 통일 이후를 미리 대비하지 않은 가운데 통일이 이루어졌을 경우에 그후유증과 갈등은 매우 심각할 것으로 예상된다. 따라서, 독일 통일과정에서 보여준 흡수통일의 후유증과 갈등사례는 우리에게 결코 남의 일이 아니며, 제반 문제점들과 갈등 양상들을 면밀하게 분석·대비할 필요가 있다. 이는 지난 60여 년 동안 이념적, 체제적으로 단절 상황이 지속되고 있는우리에게 남북한 통일에 대한 보다 일관성 있는 정책과 사회적 공론을 민주적 절차에 따른 사회적 합의로 발전시키고, 북한 사회의 폐쇄성을 극복할 수있는 적극적인 노력이 필요하다는 것을 시사하고 있다. 독일 통일 이후의 과제들이 보여주듯이 궁극적인 통일은 정치·경제·사회·체제·군사 분야 등 모든 부문의 통합으로서, 상호 차이를 인정하고 이해를 바탕으로 하는 의식의 변화가 전제되어야 통일과정에서 발생할 수 있는 후유증과 갈등을 최소화 할 수 있을 것이다.

The multilateral Agreement on Investment: Implications and Policy Recommendations

김관호 대외경제정책연구원 1997 East Asian Economic Review Vol.1 No.1

t Consultations that were kept under the discussions in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) are Multilateral Agreements on Investment (MAI) and their aim was to be signed before April 1998. The significance of the agreement was to establish a transparent and predictable institutional environment for international investment. The agreement is about the nations participating to have the obligation to make sure that foreign investment and investors will to appreciate the national treatment (treated on the same basics with its citizens), and legally binding in the MAI system, the governmental protection for domestic enterprises will become difficult, and domestic enterprise which does not have international competitiveness will face the pressure of structural adjustment. But Korea should positively approach participation into MAI from the point of promoting the internationalization of Korean economies. Although the participation into MAI would also create new challenges of the Korean economy, but it also becomes an opportunity to promote the Korean economy for transferring to a more competitive economic structure.

중국의 투자협정 정책의 변화와 한중투자협정의 고찰

김관호 韓國東北亞經濟學會 2008 동북아경제연구 Vol.20 No.1

Korea and China concluded a new bilateral investment treaty (BIT) in september 2007. It replaces the 1992 BIT between the two countries. The new Korea-China BIT offers investors enhanced protection, as compared to the previous BIT, both in their broad and effective investorstate dispute provisions, and in their developed substantive protections. The new Korea-China BIT is one of the new generation BITs into which China has entered since the late 1990s. China's new generation BITs breaks with her long-standing reservations towards investor-state dispute settlement and national treatment. China's new BIT practice may be primarily prompted by the adoption of China's 'Going Abroad' policy encouraging Chinese outbound investment. The change in the China's BIT practice may also reflects its greater willingness to protect foreign investment to the level of investment protection that prevail in international law and practice. No investor-state arbitrations have been brought as yet against the Chinese Government. Under the new generation BITs, however, the Chinese government is no longer safe from investment claims. To avoid unwelcome disputes, the Chinese government has to further improve foreign investment environment and increase its ability to manage the relationship with foreign investors effectively. Three way negotiations among Korea, China and Japan is ongoing on Trilateral Investment Treaty. Korea and Japan demand that the treaty should contain the same high standards as are seen in the recently concluded investment treaties. But it is not certain whether China will accept a treaty beyond the level of its BITs. A high-standard investment treaty, if successfully concluded, would not only help integrate the economies of the three countries, but also give a fresh boost to the start of FTA negotiations.