http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
강정원 부경역사연구소 2010 지역과 역사 Vol.- No.27
In 1917, the Japanese Imperialism made the forestry survey project(林野調査事業) that rested upon the right of ownership’s absolutism. For this, the project introduced the report system on which a landowner and a relative directly were required to report the corresponding forests. The report work was completed through a preparation- investigation and an actual work. The forestry survey project of Changwon county made 4 times to February in 1917. And the assessment(査定) was announced publicly in February 21 in 1922, and after one month, March 17, was ended. Changwon was the designated place on which was conducted the project before the promulgation of the law on 1918. Changwon was led to confusion several times on a unified the forestry register. But SingoSimduk(申告心得) which came out 1918 almost inlined with Simduk(心得) which was showed in Changwon. The person organized by the li(里), a unit of the forestry survey project, was the members of delegation on the land(地主總代). They was an experience person which was related to the forestry survey project and was a manpower with experience in theirs county’s land or the general thing. Also they had a literacy and had hold on position of an independent farmer or a tenant despite of the economical deviation. Japan replaced the own of an autonomous entity as a family land(宗中) or gye(契: a kind of traditional private fund popular among Koreans) with the own of an individual or together, and then Japan broken out, reduced its value and made the right of ownership individualized. This had hindered public interest and the public service which was having a forest, at once had brought about was a small possession area. The dispute rate about the own of forest was very small in Changwon. The dispute was the thing about right of ownership, mostly got resolved with peace. The criterion conducted the troubled part was the various documentary evidence and GumHia(禁養: The forests which not to be able to cut the grass or the tree, and so on). The forestry survey project on Changwon had broken out and had individualized the collective ownership and its utility of a local government. And it had denied fundamentally the real possession at the forest in connection with one. The forestry survey project had admitted its own in only case which had the real evidence, and had vested this authority in it.