北韓의 對南心理戰이 韓國安保에 미치는 影響

강세현 경기대학교학술진흥원 1986 京畿行政論集 Vol.1 No.-

복지국가와 법발전의 사회문화적 영향 : 하버마스의 논의를 중심으로 An Examination on the Work of Habermas

강세현 제주한라대학 1999 論文集 Vol.23 No.-

The purpose of this article is to examine the causes and impacts of the "juridification" of various spheres of social life in the welfare state. The method I shall follow is to analyze the work of J urgen Habermas who is a leading German social theorist. According to Habermas, a welfare state program that continues to be nourished by a utopia of social labor is losing its power to project future possibilities for a collectively better and less threatened way of life. In this regard, Habermas points to two limitations which welfare state has. First, because the welfare state may not interfere with the economic system's mode of functioning, it has no possibility of influencing private investment activity other than through interventions that conform to the economic system. Second, the legal and administration means through which welfare state programs are implemented are linked with a practice that threats the lifeworld by commodification and bureaucratization. Habermas argues that the growth of welfare state brings about the `rematerialization of law' and contribute to the rise of substantive rationality in law. However, according to Habermas, the trend toward substantive law encounters significants limits that make it unlikely that law can ever become fully purposive. This limits arise out of three interrelated crises of rationality crisis, legitimation crisis, motivation crisis. This crises sets limits to the substantive rationality of the welfare state. As a result of this limits, the juridification of communicatively structured areas of action promote the disintegration of life-relation through legalized social intervention. The juridification colonizes the lifeworld. Habermas' proposals to overcome the crisis of law include dejucialization, deregulation and debureaucratization, democratization of decision-making structures. It is a task how we shall take concrete shape Habermas' proposal in the future.

사회병리학적 시각에 대한 비판적 논의

강세현 제주한라대학 2002 論文集 Vol.26 No.-

The social pathology perspective contributed to organize the thinking of early American Sociologists with regard to social problems, and it occupied the status of the dominant perspective until the 1930s. It is estimated that in American society, the social pathology perspective first systematized the notion which the pathology of individuals and society can be remedied through scientific study. The social pathology perspective is rooted in the organic analogy, and its primary concern is with the ills, or pathlogies, of individuals and society. From this perspective, social problems are seen as violations of moral expectation. Their cause is thought to be socialization failure, which was attributed first to genetic inheritance and later to social environment. The result of such failure is moral erosion. The solution is moral education. Social pathologists can be grouped according to their period, orientation, and politics. Earlier pathologists tended to be conservative in their orientation and politics. Later pathologists tended to be liberal or radical in their orientation and politics. The social pathology perspective include the moral factor in the theory construction from early period to later period. In terms of that the social pathology perspective presuppose the peculiar moral value, it takes the objective position which argues that it is possible to arrive at an objective agreement as to social problems. The social pathology perspective is based on the observation of social change of the American society. Thus the social pathology perspective reflects the characteristics of the American society and the value of the American.

사회 이론에 있어 '미시-거시 연결' 전략에 대한 고찰

강세현 濟州漢拏大學論文編輯委員會 2005 論文集-논문집편집위원회 Vol.28 No.-

The purpose of this article is to study critically the strategies that try to connect action and structure, the micro and macro in social theory. In order to accomplish this purpose, this article focuses on or looking at the problem of action and structure. the mechanism which connects action to structure in the micro-macro link strategies. Specifically I will discuss methdological issues for empirical study. and the problem of rationality versus. emotion in the micro-macro link strategies. The method I shall follow is to analyze the theories of Randall Collins. Anthony Giddens. and Jon Elster. I agree that the effort to connect micro- and macro theories is worth making. The strong points of the micro-macro link strategies are to make the empirical study of macrostructures possible. to enhance the power of explanatory theory on either micro or macro level by their mutual penetration. and to overcome the dualism between action and institution. I have pointed out several things in this article. ① In the attribute of action. Collins emphasizes emotional energy. Giddens emphasizes the knowledgeability of social actors. and Elter emphasizes rationality and intentionality. ② In the cognizance of structure. Collins connects the aggregation of micro process to structure. and Elster connects the unintended consequences of action to structure. In contrast to these. Giddens considers structure as organized rules and resources. and proposes the concept of the duality of structure. According to Giddens. structure is always both enabling and constraining. by virtue of the inherent relation between structure and agency. ③ In the mechanism which connects action to structure. Collins supposes a process of emotional group identification. Elster supposes a mechanism such as the Prisoner’s Dilemma. the fallacy of composition. Giddens explains the reproduction of social life by the mechanism of regionalization and routinization On the other hand Giddens explains social change by unintended consequences of action and unacknowleged conditions of action. ④ In the application of theoretical strategies to the empirical world. Collins neglects the effect of macro relation. Giddens does not present the empirically verifiable propositions. and Elster has limitations in the scope of his theoretical application. ⑤ I argue that there is no reason to exclude emotion in micro-macro link strategies 이 글의 목적은 사회이론에 있어 행위와 구조, 미시와 거시를 연결하려는 전략들에 대해 비판적으로 검토하여 사회학 연구의 가장 근간이 되는 행위와 구조의 연결 문제를 보다 심층적으로 이해하는 데 있다. 이를 위해‘미시-거시 연결’을 주장하는 학자들의 관점을 전반적으로 검토하기 보다는 행위와 구조를 어떻게 규정하고 있는가 ① 행위와 구조의 연결 메카니즘은 무엇인가라는 문제에 초점을 맞추어 분석한 후, 학자들 간에 나타나고 있는 주요 쟁점에 대해 비판적으로 논의해 보려고 한다. 비판적 논의는 ① 경험적 연구를 위한 각 전략들의 방법론적 의미,② 행위에 있어 합리성과 정서의 문제를 중심으로 살펴보고자 한다. 이 때, 비판의 근거는 교과서적으로 순수한 과학적 이론의 일반적 특성에 비추어 특정한 이론적 전망을 비판하는 방식을 피하고 각 전략들의 비교를 통해 나타난 이론의 부적합성을 지적하고 그 부적합성올 어떻게 고칠 수 있는가 하는 점을 기준으로 하고자 한다. 사실 아직까지도 ‘미시-거시 연결’올 시도하는 이론적 작업의 유용성올 의문시하고 있는 주장들도 온존하고 있으며, 또한 미시사회학과 거시사회학은 각기 자신들의 영역 내에서 자신들의 방법대로 훌륭한 연구를 진행하고 있음을 내세우고 있는 실정이다. 그래서 ‘미시-거시연결’을 검토하기 위해서는 우선 ‘행위와 구조, 미시 와 거시를 연결하는 작업이 과연 가능한가?’라는 문제에 대해서 검토하고 타당한 근거를 제시하는 일이 필요하다.

낙인론적 일탈 이론과 교정사회복지

강세현 제주한라대학 1997 論文集 Vol.21 No.-

The aims of this paper are briefly to describe the propositions of labelling theory, to explore its impact on criminal justice policy and social welfare practice, and to examine the contents and the effectiveness of crime control programs based on labelling theory. The core proposition of labelling theory is that social control leads to deviance, or social control creates deviance. This labelling theory's contention trasformed social welfare practice as well as deviance theory. Labelling theory shifted the focus of attention from the crimianl actor to the labelling agencies, including the police, the courts, the welfare agencies, the mass media and the state. It encouraged a healthy scepticism about the working of the criminal justice system, and helped social workers to commit to labelling theory's policy prescriptions of diversion and deinstitutionalization. Crime control programs based on labelling theory has been taken up within state from the 1970s onwards in Britain and U. S. A. The results of the assessments of the programs are as follow : labelling theory's policy is relatively effective to minor offences, but is irrelevant to the control of serious crimes such as robbery and burglary. It also has the problems of treatment without trial and widening the net of social control. The limitation of the labelling theory's policy is the limitation of the theory itself, that it marginalizes concern with the social and personal contexts which cause deviance, with the rehabilitation of the labelled deviant. Thus, labelling theory restricts the opportunities available for welfare agencies to intervene in the criminal justice process.

제주도 청소년 육성 정책의 발전 방향과 전략

강세현 제주간호보건전문대학 2006 論文集-논문집편집위원회 Vol.29 No.-

The Purpose of this article is to examine the foundation and present condition of youth rearing in Jejudo, to present the developmental direction and policy of youth rearing. The method I shall follow is to analyse the existing documents and public statistical data As a result of the analysis, the actual state of youth rearing is as follows. First, the youth population in 2004 was 127,877 22.9% of the total population of Jejudo. The youth population decreased in comparison to the previous year. 56.8% of the youth population reside in Jeju city Second, 25 youth training facilities have been established. There are 24 youth study room. There are 3 Irregular night school establishments. In am there were 17 youth groups. The number of youth participationg in these group was 39,046, 30.5% of the total youth population. I have presented several things in relation to the direction of the youth rearing policy. First, youth should be subject in the promotion of youth rearing policy Second, the youth rearing policy should be based in the community. Third, the programs for human resourse develop ment need to be developed Fourth, the policy for the growth of self control capacities and leadership need to be developed. I have presented several things in relation to the strategies of youth rearing First, the expansion of youth training facilities Second, the system construction of the training activities that youth become the subject Third, the support for a youth science festival. Fourth,the support of language study and an information camp.

업무용항공기 운영에 필요한 운항지원시설(FBO&GAT)에 대한 연구

강세현,Kang, Seh hyeon 한국항공운항학회 2017 한국항공운항학회지 Vol.25 No.3

The primary purpose of this thesis is to define and discuss the integration of fixed-base operators(FBO) and general aviation terminals(GAT) in Korean aviation practices in order to develop effective management and operational processes needed for Korea's expanding role in the northeast Asian region. The foundation of this research rests on four interconnected strategic points: the Korean government establishing regulations that define general and business aviation, increasing awareness of FBO and GAT, developing standards for effective operations, and optimizing the budget to build necessary infrastructure. There must be an initiative in establishing a guideline of future demand in order for these aforementioned points to take hold and for aviation activities to flourish. Korea will play a more integral role in an emerging market of general and business aviation by adhering to these strategic efforts.

일탈과 의례의 사회 통제적 기능

강세현 제주간호보건전문대학 2010 論文集-논문집편집위원회 Vol.33 No.-

The purpose of this article is to examine the relations of moral order, deviance, and ritual, in connection with the social control in modern society. In order to accomplish this purpose, this article investigates the classical assertions of Emile Durkheim, and then look into the empirical analysis of Kai Erikson that interprets historical facts based on the perspectives of Emile Durkheirn. The results of this study are as follows. The assertions of Emile Durkheim are ratherclose to the labeling theory than are evlauated as a pioneer of the structural functional theory of deviance, as we have recognized so far. The reasons as such are as follows. First, Durkheim insists that crirne is normal in a sρciety. Second, society reconfirms and elevates the collective conciousness of a society through the ritual control process of deviance. Third, the ritual control process contributes to the maintenance of moral order in a society. Accordingly, it should be understood that order, deviance, and ritual are closely connected, in Durkheirn’s theory. Furthermore, Erikson asserts that society itself makes deviant behavior to maintain the order of a society. But it is inconvenient that Erikson does not sufficiently analyse the role of ritual in the process of deviance control. Durkheirn’s and Erikson’s assertions can be applied to the analysis of deviance and social control in modern society. Their theoretical insights are very useful to explain the political deviance in modern society. The control of political deviance can not be explained only by political pressure process for the political power and the interest of economic class. So, deviance and social control can be systematically explained by the ritual theory that is induced from Durkheirn' s and Erikson’s assertions.

범죄와 비행 연구에 있어 이론적 통합론의 비판적 고찰

강세현 제주한라대학 1998 論文集 Vol.22 No.-

The aims of this paper are to describe briefly the development process of crime and delinquency theories, to review critically the various approaches to theory integration which has been enlarged from 1980s onwards. In order to accomplish this aims, this paper divide various theories into consensus and conflict paradigm. Consensus paradigm involves anomie theory, differential association theory, subcultural theory, control theory. Conflict paradigm involves labelling theory, conflict and Marxist theory. The interest in integrating theoretical perspectives is a direct response to the growing dissatisfaction with the empirical adequacy of classical theories of crime and delinquency and with respect to the competative hypothesis approach to theory building and verification. At the heart of the integration approach is an assumption that the causes of crime and delinquency are multiple. The causal processes leading to criminal behavior are viewed as more varied and complex than those posed by traditional explanations. The major objective in attempts to integrate divergent theoretical perspectives is to increase the explanatory power of theories. Approaches to theory integration involve not only a synthesis of theories within consensus paradigm but also a synthesis of theories based on consensus and conflict paradigm. Stategies to integrate different theoretical perspectives within consensus paradigm incline to explain the causes of crime at the social psychological and individual level. In contrast to this strategies, attempts to integrate consensus and conflict paradigm try to link macrosociological and microsociological explanations for crime. However, I doubt that integrated models will accomplish theoretical innovation about crime and delinquency. I think that true theoretical innovation is to create new theory through modification, refinement, and specification of traditional theories, based on empirical world rather than to integrate individual theories.

한국의 문화적 전통과 소년 비행의 양상: 비교문화적 고찰

강세현 한국청소년정책연구원 1995 한국청소년연구 Vol.- No.22