RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • Research of a Research-Based American PETE Program

        ( Matthew D. Curtner Smith ) 한국체육학회 2015 국제스포츠과학 학술대회 Vol.2015 No.1

        In the United States, research undertaken by specialists in sport pedagogy started in the mid-to-late 1970s. Initially, the focus was on effective teaching of physical education in schools. Within a short time period, however, other researchers focused their efforts on studying effective physical education teacher education (PETE). In actuality, the findings and ideas generated by both groups of researchers were used by some American Kinesiology departments, mostly situated in research universities, as the basis for how they trained their undergraduate preservice teachers within their PETE programs. The Department of Kinesiology within the University of Alabama is one such department. My primary purpose during this presentation will be to describe the research- based PETE program that I helped build at the University of Alabama and have worked in for 25 years. In addition, I will highlight some of the research I have conducted on this program with graduate students and colleagues. Specifically, I will focus on two areas: (a) research carried out on the occupational socialization of our preservice teachers and (b) research conducted on our preservice teachers` teaching within the curriculum model of sport education. As well as attempting to answer questions from the delegates at the conference as is customary, I will conclude the presentation by asking the following questions of the delegates: (a) How do Korean PETE programs differ from our program in terms of organizational structure? (b) How do Korean PETE programs differ from our program in terms of their theoretical and research-based frameworks? (c) Do Korean PETE programs employ a models-based approach? and (d) Is there any research on the effectiveness of Korean PETE programs using occupational socialization as the theoretical framework?

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼