http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : William G. Boltz (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
William G. Boltz 훈민정음학회 2016 Scripta Vol.8 No.1
Linguistically, monosyllabicity means that all of the words (technically, the morphemes) of a language consist of only one syllable. This entails a claim that there are no syllables in such a language that do not have a meaning. Chinese, both modern and Classical, has often been described as monosyllabic. It is clear from direct inspection that no modern Chinese language is monosyllabic, and it is equally clear from the lexical analysis of pre-modern written texts that the Classical Chinese language is also not monosyllabic. In both languages it is easy to find words of two syllables, where one or both of the syllables have no independent usage or meaning. But for Classical Chinese in its written form, owing to the nature of the Chinese writing system, we do not find syllables that do not convey, or at least imply, a meaning. Classical Chinese is known only through its representation in written texts, that is, through the medium of Chinese characters. Except when overtly marked as desemanticized, Chinese characters typically carry both sound and meaning. For the great majority of characters this is directly observable in the character’s graphic structure. Most characters include in their composition a semantically marked graphic component, known variously as a semantic determinative, semantic classifier, or somewhat imprecisely, a “radical”, which is associated with or in some way representative of a meaning. Even characters for what are linguistically asemantic syllables typically include a semantic component in their graphic structure, making them orthographically “words.” In this sense Classical Chinese is orthographically monosyllabic.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
