RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • EQUITY OWNERSHIP PATTERNS AND IMPACT ON OPERATIONS: EVIDENCE FROM U.S. FIRMS IN CHINA

        Turgut Guvenli,Rajib Sanyal People&Global Business Association 2002 Global Business and Finance Review Vol.7 No.2

        This study examines how variations in equity ownership among U.S. firms in China translate into actual organizational practices and experiences. Four levels of equity ownership-minority, equal, majority, and wholly foreign owned-are tested against three sets of variables-finance. government relations, and human resource management. There is no clear-cut advantage for one level of equity ownership over another. On some issues, wholly owned firms appear to enjoy certain freedoms and advantages while on other issues, there are benefits to being a minority or equal partner, or a majority owner in a joint venture. Majority and wholly owned ventures are able to introduce distinct human resource practices in their Chinese operations but are less likely to develop good relationships with the Chinese government and bureaucracy. Joint ventures are more likely to exhibit patterns typical of Chinese enterprises and less able to resist meddling by government authorities. Consequently, firms contemplating entry into China would have to examine their own unique circumstances and industry specific factors to determine whether they should form a minority, equal, majority or wholly owned enterprise.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼