http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Reda Ali Hassan Mahmoud (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Grammatical and Pragmatic Aspects of Polarity in Arabic Seditious Utterances
Reda Ali Hassan Mahmoud 세종대학교 언어연구소 2016 Journal of Universal Language Vol.17 No.2
This study analyzes various grammatical and pragmatic aspects of polarity in Arabic seditious utterances. Arabic Seditious Utterances (ASUs) are a result of the general atmosphere of incitement and discontent against lawful authorities which prevails before and after the revolution. ASUs feature the use of both negative polarity aspects to refute a number of oppressive and unjust actions of political and administrative authorities and other positive polarity aspects to affirm the allegements and demands of the claimants. Such negative and positive distinction in ASUs is represented grammatically (syntactically, lexically, and semantically) in positive and negative polarity items. They are also represented pragmatically in context-sensitive aspects within these utterances. The focus of this paper is on the analysis of seditious utterances, the various aspects of positive and negative syntactic, lexical and semantic polarity items, their scalar ways of representations in addition to other creative aspects of pragmatic-sensitive expressions of polarity. An eclectic approach is designed to suite the analysis of the scalar and multi-aspect nature of grammatical as well as pragmatic data which has been collected within a span of three years of national unrest. The analysis of the examples of ASUs shows that negative and positive polarity distinction rise above the grammatical component to other entailed and implicated pragmatic aspects. The analysis of ASUs also explains the inventive ways of pragmatic aspects which are used to understate or accentuate the control of grammatical and lexical components of polarity according to their various contexts.
-
Reda Ali Hassan Mahmoud 세종대학교 언어연구소 2018 Journal of Universal Language Vol.19 No.2
The problem why a speaker or a writer assigns a certain designation for the Egyptian revolution in 2011 is the primary focus of this paper. For this objective, this paper investigates underlying conceptual relations between the literal word „revolution‟ and its different figurative and non-figurative designations. The syntagmatic relation between the literal tenor revolution and its designations or „vehicles‟ can be interpreted in terms of user‟s pragmatic investment of designations in discourse. The data in this study have been gathered from various written and spoken discourses and consist mainly of the most frequent designations of January 25 revolution. The analysis of data shows that pragmatic investment is determined by three main perlocutions, the user‟s intentions of being unbiased, tactful, and biased. These intentions also determine the meanings of the designations according to five conceptual relations. These conceptual relations show the link between the word revolution and the user‟s figurative or non-figurative designations such as spatial and temporal relations that determine the literal designations, tactful relations that determine the diplomatic use of figurative designations, and positive and negative relations that determine the figurative designations of pro- or anti-revolutionists. The study is based on an eclectic pragmatic approach to explore the literal/nonliteral meanings of the designations and their pragmatic investment. This approach is mainly based on Searle‟s contextual assumptions, Katz‟s approach of literalness and Lakoff and Johnson‟s conceptual theory. The study concludes that several pragmatic determiners of meaning govern the pragmatic investment of figurative and nonfigurative designations, their underlying conceptual relations, and their degree of literalness.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
